Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

You are so delusional it’s kind of funny.

Who are you to say what “people” want?

I live in London and the people range from disinterested to thinking they are lazy tossers.

Every single person who buys tabloids or People magazine to read about her, who visits websites to see whether she wore what tiara and which jewels with a certain designer gown, and all those stores that sell out of every single piece of clothing that she wears in public or puts on her kids, along with the toys her kids might play with.

That is all she needs to do and people will be happy with her.

She is beautiful like Diana, but not crazy. She is normal and relatable, and with the help of nannies or not, presents the most normal image of a mom as the British royals have ever seen.

She does her job quite well, and most people expect nothing more from her, especially here in America.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

You are so delusional it’s kind of funny.

Who are you to say what “people” want?

I live in London and the people range from disinterested to thinking they are lazy tossers.

Go chat up some fellow Londoners then. The “people” in DC like the dresses and the cute kids and that’s enough for us.

DP. You are so weird with your on high pronouncements of what the people.in DC want. Truly bizarre.

You really think anyone around here cares how much the royals “work”? Really?

Anonymous wrote:And when the hater poster starts dreaming up the actual scenario of them stepping down === THIS is why I posted on previous threads that hater is anti monarchy. They have denied that and called me a lunatic.

I’ve asked them to admit that, admit that they’re coming here with an agenda—and hoping to influence, I don’t know, someone. Or to influence an overall feeling.

Just admit that you don’t like monarchy. If you do that, and then start your own thread about “let’s take down the monarchy,” we could have a conversation.

Stop beating around the bush!

Yup, you are a lunatic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

NP. How on Earth do you know what the "vast majority of people" want?

Because this is the Entertainment forum. Looking at work charts and talking about British tax payers money is the opposite of entertaining.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

You are so delusional it’s kind of funny.

Who are you to say what “people” want?

I live in London and the people range from disinterested to thinking they are lazy tossers.

Go chat up some fellow Londoners then. The “people” in DC like the dresses and the cute kids and that’s enough for us.

DP. You are so weird with your on high pronouncements of what the people.in DC want. Truly bizarre.

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

NP. How on Earth do you know what the "vast majority of people" want?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

You are so delusional it’s kind of funny.

Who are you to say what “people” want?

I live in London and the people range from disinterested to thinking they are lazy tossers.

Go chat up some fellow Londoners then. The “people” in DC like the dresses and the cute kids and that’s enough for us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

You are so delusional it’s kind of funny.

Who are you to say what “people” want?

I live in London and the people range from disinterested to thinking they are lazy tossers.

If you really live in London why are you reading American forum? Don't you have anything better to do?

No. They are on a mission to roam messageboards across the earth and spread their royal love or hate and gather followers. It really is a cult. This post eventually disappears, but is bumped up because it must be on the top so all can see the royal revelations revealed here doggoneit!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

You are so delusional it’s kind of funny.

Who are you to say what “people” want?

I live in London and the people range from disinterested to thinking they are lazy tossers.

If you really live in London why are you reading American forum? Don't you have anything better to do?

Anonymous wrote:And when the hater poster starts dreaming up the actual scenario of them stepping down === THIS is why I posted on previous threads that hater is anti monarchy. They have denied that and called me a lunatic.

I’ve asked them to admit that, admit that they’re coming here with an agenda—and hoping to influence, I don’t know, someone. Or to influence an overall feeling.

Just admit that you don’t like monarchy. If you do that, and then start your own thread about “let’s take down the monarchy,” we could have a conversation.

Stop beating around the bush!

+1. I've asked, and the question is never answered of what the poster thinks is going to happen if Will & Kate don't "shape up" or why they should be worried if Harry & Meghan attend more events. There seems to be a threat that they need to do better or else something happens. But the something is never mentioned. Stop beating around the bush, indeed. It's getting very tiresome.

Anonymous wrote:Meh, what Kate Hater and Work Chart Lady refuse to acknowledge is that the vast majority of people just want Kate to look nice, wear jewels and fabulous dresses, and produce adorable children. As long as she does that and appears more or less pleasant and normal, most people either do not care or will be happy with her.

You are so delusional it’s kind of funny.

Who are you to say what “people” want?

I live in London and the people range from disinterested to thinking they are lazy tossers.

My guess is hater is Canadian.

Hater thinks the uk would do something better with that tax money. Nope. Their politicians would just screw it up.

Anonymous wrote:And when the hater poster starts dreaming up the actual scenario of them stepping down === THIS is why I posted on previous threads that hater is anti monarchy. They have denied that and called me a lunatic.

I’ve asked them to admit that, admit that they’re coming here with an agenda—and hoping to influence, I don’t know, someone. Or to influence an overall feeling.

Just admit that you don’t like monarchy. If you do that, and then start your own thread about “let’s take down the monarchy,” we could have a conversation.

Stop beating around the bush!

Me again. I will point out that if poster is an American and is anti monarchy, then Great!! You’ve won by living w/o one.

If you are in the UK or a commonwealth country...you have more room.

If you are in a commonwealth country, why are you here?

And when the hater poster starts dreaming up the actual scenario of them stepping down === THIS is why I posted on previous threads that hater is anti monarchy. They have denied that and called me a lunatic.

I’ve asked them to admit that, admit that they’re coming here with an agenda—and hoping to influence, I don’t know, someone. Or to influence an overall feeling.

Just admit that you don’t like monarchy. If you do that, and then start your own thread about “let’s take down the monarchy,” we could have a conversation.

Stop beating around the bush!

NP. I recall reading recently that Balmoral alone is worth 140mil (whether dollars or pounds, I don’t remember). I don’t know what kind of inheritance tax there is in Britain, but even after taxes that should be sufficient. One would think.