Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s risky having a baby at this age.

Not anymore, grandma.

She's only 36, that's not old!

I bet she and Harry will love parenthood.

I know right? Wasn't sophie 40 when she had her first of 2 children?

And Sophie had a lot of issues.
Ectopic
Placental abruption resulting in emergency c section. Plus, her daughter has that eye issue.

Waiting was not a good idea for Sophie.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s risky having a baby at this age.

Not anymore, grandma.

She's only 36, that's not old!

I bet she and Harry will love parenthood.

I know right? Wasn't sophie 40 when she had her first of 2 children?

I get it, but it’s still an age where complications increase. That’s what pp means.

I had two kids after 40. Healthy pregnancies, healthy babies. And my fitness level was average at best at the start. Yes, the risks are higher, but the overwhelming majority of pregnancies at her age have positive outcomes.

yep. 36 is actually lots of time for a healthy pregnancy, especially if starting out fit like Meghan. Yes complications increase but giving birth at 37 is nbd at all.

I was in much better shape at 36 when I got pregnant with my 2nd baby than I was with my first baby (34). I had been walking daily with my first in the stroller + going to the gym when I found out I was pregnant with my 2nd. It was a super easy, very healthy pregnancy and a healthy baby.

I'm sure that Meghan will do just fine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s risky having a baby at this age.

Not anymore, grandma.

She's only 36, that's not old!

I bet she and Harry will love parenthood.

I know right? Wasn't sophie 40 when she had her first of 2 children?

I get it, but it’s still an age where complications increase. That’s what pp means.

I had two kids after 40. Healthy pregnancies, healthy babies. And my fitness level was average at best at the start. Yes, the risks are higher, but the overwhelming majority of pregnancies at her age have positive outcomes.

yep. 36 is actually lots of time for a healthy pregnancy, especially if starting out fit like Meghan. Yes complications increase but giving birth at 37 is nbd at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s risky having a baby at this age.

Not anymore, grandma.

She's only 36, that's not old!

I bet she and Harry will love parenthood.

I know right? Wasn't sophie 40 when she had her first of 2 children?

I get it, but it’s still an age where complications increase. That’s what pp means.

I had two kids after 40. Healthy pregnancies, healthy babies. And my fitness level was average at best at the start. Yes, the risks are higher, but the overwhelming majority of pregnancies at her age have positive outcomes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm still not seeing it.

not even with that absurd shawl shirt??

Outfits like this are what bump watch completely unreliable.

Yes. It’s a pile of fabric at her midsection. How could we tell?

It's a collection of outfits with extra fabric at her midsection that has fueled this speculation. Not just one outfit.

I think she's pregnant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s risky having a baby at this age.

Not anymore, grandma.

She's only 36, that's not old!

I bet she and Harry will love parenthood.

I know right? Wasn't sophie 40 when she had her first of 2 children?

I get it, but it’s still an age where complications increase. That’s what pp means.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm still not seeing it.

not even with that absurd shawl shirt??

Outfits like this are what bump watch completely unreliable.

Yes. It’s a pile of fabric at her midsection. How could we tell?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s risky having a baby at this age.

Not anymore, grandma.

She's only 36, that's not old!

I bet she and Harry will love parenthood.

I know right? Wasn't sophie 40 when she had her first of 2 children?

Anonymous wrote:Aren’t they going on a tour through areas that have Zika? I thought they’d wait until after they got back due to the potential complications.

Next month. They've announced the cities and the countries for the 50-stop tour. She may just sit out the events dealing with the Tongo. Whatever the case, I'm sure their army of specialists have it covered.

Aren’t they going on a tour through areas that have Zika? I thought they’d wait until after they got back due to the potential complications.

Anonymous wrote:Has the Daily Mail called it yet?

Nope. They have no proof. Palace isn't talking and neither are Meghan's friends. Though I'm pretty sure I know one she's been whispering too about it recently.

https://people.com/sports/meghan-markle-serena-williams-relying-on-each-other/

I mean what else is there that they would need to really 'rely on' each other for. They both were celebrities before this. Only one thing that has changed for both of them in the past 12 months.

Has the Daily Mail called it yet?

Ohhh, I'm hoping for twin girls, too! ....with a mop of red curls!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she must be at least 12 weeks to have that sized bump, no? Or twins? As a thin 1st time mom she wouldn't pop that early.

I'm rooting for twins. I heard somewhere it was two girls. But how early can you tell sex on a sonogram?

Twins would be great; rooting for girls for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s risky having a baby at this age.

Not anymore, grandma.

She's only 36, that's not old!

I bet she and Harry will love parenthood.