Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Had a love child.
Did you guys divorce? Does he bring the child around?
No, still married.
The mother, sadly, does not allow the child to come around our house so he sees the child separately.
This always amazes me. Honestly don't you really hate him? I get it that many have to stay married because of health, money, kids etc. issues. However there is no way I'd ever love that person let alone like them.
Hope you have money he doesn't know about..
Anonymous wrote:Knew he had herpes and never told me. I ended up contracting it from him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Suggested I abort our child because he wasn't ready to be a dad.
Other than that he's not selfish at all.
Unless you two decided to get pregnant together and then he told you, I don't think there's anything wrong with this. If anything, it's selfish of you to have a child when you know its father doesn't want it.
Wanting to have your baby isn't being selfish. Wanting to kill an inconvenient baby is being selfish.
Haven’t you heard? It’s not a baby, it’s just a group of cells.
Hardly the universal opinion among parents.
Only among educated ones.
No. People at least as educated as you can disagree with you on this.
I got pregnant as a result of BC failure. I can assure you that what is truly selfish is having a baby that you have no or little interest in putting in the time and effort to raise. I wish the father had been honest with me and said, "I am not interested in being a father, I think abortion is the best choice.". That would have been infinitely preferable to watching my repeatedly disappointed kids for 20 years.
You wish you had aborted your kids? You are gem, must have been a great mother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Had a love child.
Did you guys divorce? Does he bring the child around?
No, still married.
The mother, sadly, does not allow the child to come around our house so he sees the child separately.
Anonymous wrote:He chose alcohol over his family.
There's a lot more to this story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Suggested I abort our child because he wasn't ready to be a dad.
Other than that he's not selfish at all.
Unless you two decided to get pregnant together and then he told you, I don't think there's anything wrong with this. If anything, it's selfish of you to have a child when you know its father doesn't want it.
Wanting to have your baby isn't being selfish. Wanting to kill an inconvenient baby is being selfish.
Haven’t you heard? It’s not a baby, it’s just a group of cells.
Hardly the universal opinion among parents.
Only among educated ones.
No. People at least as educated as you can disagree with you on this.
I got pregnant as a result of BC failure. I can assure you that what is truly selfish is having a baby that you have no or little interest in putting in the time and effort to raise. I wish the father had been honest with me and said, "I am not interested in being a father, I think abortion is the best choice.". That would have been infinitely preferable to watching my repeatedly disappointed kids for 20 years.
You wish you had aborted your kids? You are gem, must have been a great mother.
I did not say I wished to have an abortion. I said I wished the father had been honest about his committment, or lack thereof, to all that fatherhood requires.
I am a terrific mom, and I have terrific kids. But, had I known that their father was uninterested in doing the work of fatherhood, I would have chosen to have an abortion. BTW, at that point, IMO, they were not "kids;" they were a fetus that could not survive outside my womb and may or may not have developed on their own to full term birth. Had I had an abortion, I would have had some other kids, with an involved father. I would have been a great mother to those kids to and those kids would have been just as great and loved as my kids that I have now. I think it is dishonest to put women in the position of having to bear children in all circumstances or else they are labelled "bad moms" who "don't love their kids." Women who have abortions are often demanding to have the chance to raise children in the better circumstances.
I have no problem with parents who choose to have kids out of wedlock, but what is truly selfish is convincing a partner to continue an unplanned pregnancy when you have no ability and/or no intention to be a fully involved co-parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Suggested I abort our child because he wasn't ready to be a dad.
Other than that he's not selfish at all.
Unless you two decided to get pregnant together and then he told you, I don't think there's anything wrong with this. If anything, it's selfish of you to have a child when you know its father doesn't want it.
Wanting to have your baby isn't being selfish. Wanting to kill an inconvenient baby is being selfish.
Haven’t you heard? It’s not a baby, it’s just a group of cells.
Hardly the universal opinion among parents.
Only among educated ones.
No. People at least as educated as you can disagree with you on this.
I got pregnant as a result of BC failure. I can assure you that what is truly selfish is having a baby that you have no or little interest in putting in the time and effort to raise. I wish the father had been honest with me and said, "I am not interested in being a father, I think abortion is the best choice.". That would have been infinitely preferable to watching my repeatedly disappointed kids for 20 years.
You wish you had aborted your kids? You are gem, must have been a great mother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Suggested I abort our child because he wasn't ready to be a dad.
Other than that he's not selfish at all.
Unless you two decided to get pregnant together and then he told you, I don't think there's anything wrong with this. If anything, it's selfish of you to have a child when you know its father doesn't want it.
Wanting to have your baby isn't being selfish. Wanting to kill an inconvenient baby is being selfish.
Haven’t you heard? It’s not a baby, it’s just a group of cells.
Hardly the universal opinion among parents.
Only among educated ones.
No. People at least as educated as you can disagree with you on this.
I got pregnant as a result of BC failure. I can assure you that what is truly selfish is having a baby that you have no or little interest in putting in the time and effort to raise. I wish the father had been honest with me and said, "I am not interested in being a father, I think abortion is the best choice.". That would have been infinitely preferable to watching my repeatedly disappointed kids for 20 years.
Anonymous wrote:I'd heard so much about Breaking Bad, I started watching the old episodes on Hulu. I realized what a fabulous series it was, told DH he'd love it and we should watch it together. I re-watched half the first season with him (so we could enjoy it together and talk about it, KWIM?). We watched 2 seasons together. He then got sick and took a week off work. While he was off, he watched all the remaining episodes without me. But, he didn't tell me until after he'd watched them all! What a selfish prick! I have since refused to watch any more of them. F*ck it.
Now, I don't even bother to find shows we might watch together. I just look for shows our tween DS and I can enjoy together (it was something we did even before binging on Breaking Bad). When DH asks me about shows we should watch together, I just look at him and say "Breaking Bad".
Otherwise, he's a good guy and our marriage is pretty good.
we have a don't ask don't tell policy about this. DH travels a lot for work and I know he watches/finished entire seasons in his hotel room. But he pretends he hasn't so that we watch them together. Now that is love.
oh, if we're talking about having a baby--DH did not stay with me with #2 (which was my first c section). I sent him home to care for our toddler. I was in good hands, though. The first baby, it was nice to have him there and obviously he wanted to be there and bond with the baby, etc. But there's a lot of just sitting around while mom tries to nurse. I wanted DH to bring me some decent food, decent coffee, and field the phone calls, etc. And, he had to run out to get preemie clothes at the last minute because we had a full term but unexpectedly tiny baby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He got upset when I told him I'd need him to stay with me overnight in the hospital after I gave birth to our daughter. He'd been hoping to sleep at home then come back in the mornings and was very upset he had to sleep on the uncomfortable recliner in my recovery room. It wasn't our finest moment but honestly, we were both so exhausted after a multi-day induction that neither of us were thinking clearly. It was a single moment of dumb@ssness from an otherwise wonderful man.
Is it really so bad? I wouldn't want to sleep on that stupid recliner either and if he's just going home to sleep and coming right back in the morning... why is that a big deal?
Because I hadn't slept for 48 hours. Because we were in a "baby friendly" hospital that provided absolutely no help with the baby besides coming in and yelling at me for doing apparently every single thing wrong, they literally wouldn't even hand me the baby if they were already in the room. Because the call button in our room didn't work so if there had been an issue, I couldn't have alerted the nurses (I tried shouting and they didn't hear me). Because my epidural didn't wear off for hours so I couldn't stand up to get the baby on my own. Because, even after the epidural finally wore off, I had a 3rd degree tear and needed help getting out of bed each and every time and needed help getting onto and off of the toilet.
Because I needed him there.
You sound really needy.
+1000. Next time hire assistants to be with you. Or choose a different hospital.
Given the atrocious rate of maternal death in this country, I think it’s absolutely necessary for women to have an advocate by their side to help monitor and speak up for them — especially important in hospitals without nurseries where these women are expected to provide care while recovering. Hospitals are too understaffed and focused solely on the baby’s well-being. This is how women are dying from postpartum preeclampsia, etc.
It’s not being needy — it’s being smart.
Anonymous wrote:My STBX went home after the birth of our son - home was fifteen minutes away - to pick up some things, including food. He ended up falling asleep and came back five hours later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He got upset when I told him I'd need him to stay with me overnight in the hospital after I gave birth to our daughter. He'd been hoping to sleep at home then come back in the mornings and was very upset he had to sleep on the uncomfortable recliner in my recovery room. It wasn't our finest moment but honestly, we were both so exhausted after a multi-day induction that neither of us were thinking clearly. It was a single moment of dumb@ssness from an otherwise wonderful man.
Is it really so bad? I wouldn't want to sleep on that stupid recliner either and if he's just going home to sleep and coming right back in the morning... why is that a big deal?
Because I hadn't slept for 48 hours. Because we were in a "baby friendly" hospital that provided absolutely no help with the baby besides coming in and yelling at me for doing apparently every single thing wrong, they literally wouldn't even hand me the baby if they were already in the room. Because the call button in our room didn't work so if there had been an issue, I couldn't have alerted the nurses (I tried shouting and they didn't hear me). Because my epidural didn't wear off for hours so I couldn't stand up to get the baby on my own. Because, even after the epidural finally wore off, I had a 3rd degree tear and needed help getting out of bed each and every time and needed help getting onto and off of the toilet.
Because I needed him there.
You sound really needy.
+1000. Next time hire assistants to be with you. Or choose a different hospital.