Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obamacare - Highly "peer reviewed". All 3,000 pages.
Going tits up. LOLOLOL
You are clueless about “peer reviewed publications”. You don’t even know much about the basic civics about a bill and how it becomes law. You lack the education and intelligence to have a debate BUT sadly even ignorant people have the right to speak crap. Enjoy your right. Good bye.
The last few pages are filled with ignorant posts. People you need to stop getting your "information" from talk radio and from dodgy websites.
It makes it easier for charlatans and snake oil salesmen to convince people that up is down.
So when the MSM reports that Paul Ryan's example of a middle class family earning $59,000 a year gets a $1200 tax cut is flawed and they will actually pay $500 more in taxes after a few years, it does not even register because it will not be reported in the right wing echo chamber.
When Bruce Bartlett who is largely responsible for the much vaunted Reagan tax cuts writes to warn Republicans that they did not result in enough economic growth to pay for themselves and actually made the national debt worse, he will not be interviewed on Fox News or by conservative talk show hosts.
Anonymous wrote:The rich and corporations need tax cuts. They are the job creators. When they have more money, it's better for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:If someone had a 1m mortgage now the interest of about 4500 - annual 54000 plus the 10000=64000 deduction.
A new mortgage would be on the 500,000 and 27 000+ 10000=37,000. Consider the removal of income based limitations on itemized deductions.
That removal was for married over 311,300 removing 3%. At inc=$511,300 the 1m mortgage holder gets 64000 deduction when existing plan capped at about $35,500 yielding 29k more in deductions.
This is what, a dough nut hole? Politicians are ignoring this inequity and simply complaining about SALT rather than a subset getting major benefits.
That is why there should be deductions for up to 50k max-any combo of SALT and mtg.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obamacare - Highly "peer reviewed". All 3,000 pages.
Going tits up. LOLOLOL
You are clueless about “peer reviewed publications”. You don’t even know much about the basic civics about a bill and how it becomes law. You lack the education and intelligence to have a debate BUT sadly even ignorant people have the right to speak crap. Enjoy your right. Good bye.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.[/quote]
You and millions of others, pp. I hear you
The GOP apparently feels entitled to take the earnings and property of the middle class and give it to millionaires and billionaires. What about the corporate subsidies - where my hard earned tax dollars go to feed some profitable private company even more money? What about the infrastructure and other government expenditures that bolster industries across the is country - from manufacturing to agriculture to oil and gas? How does that figure for you?
If rich people steal and mooch, it's okay with you, isn't it.
Greedy hypocrite.
That's right - wealth redistribution is unfortunately very real and it's the exact opposite of what the Republicans have been saying. For the last 40 years the rich have gotten richer and it's been entirely at the expense of the poor and middle class. Their wealth is on our backs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m an upper middle class professional and a Democrat. For years I’ve been hearing that I should really be Republican for my own self interest. Less taxes and all that. But now this new Trump/Republican tax plan come out and guess what, it complete is not good for me.
Can someone explain?
I thought liberals wanted their taxes raised to support those in need. All talk?
Only with other people's money.
And this is the truth!
The outcry among liberals because it will cost them a few dollars surfaces their hypocrisy.
Yet none of you conservatives will admit where the extra tax dollars are going. Why is that?
I'm still waiting for you libs to tell us how much extra you're willing to pay. About three cents?
Um, crickets.
Talking to conservatives is like banging one's head on the wall. On about eighteen threads liberals have patiently explained we'll gladly pay more IF that money goes to real stuff: cleaning up the environment, stopping climate change, fixing infrastructure, strengthening the support network for those with less. I'd pay an additional 10K.
BUT - and here's the brick wall parts A and B - this gives more money to the super wealthy and corporations and this thread isn't about that.
Well then Write a check to the treasury. You're still under the tax structure and spending of the Obama days, because the present administration's bill hasn't passed. Now get that checkbook out AND WRITE THE CHECK. Stop yakking and start doing.
Not pp. Typical idiot who has no understanding. There is no provision to write checks to Treasury. Besides you are missing the point that Libs want the money to be spent for the right causes. Just giving money to treasury without knowing what it will be spent on is not what we want. Got it? But idiots don't and will repeat again.
Actually there is a line on your Fed tax form allowing you to contribute to reduce the deficit. What you are saying is you want smaller government but only focused in the areas you see as important, or don’t ask me for more. That’s a pipe dream. This bill reduces taxes for those making under 90k by about 75%. If that’s not helping the poor, I don’t know what is. And don’t all people get their first 90k taxed at the really low rate too? Someone in the DC bubble or other high cost areas will never get it because they think 250k is poor
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m an upper middle class professional and a Democrat. For years I’ve been hearing that I should really be Republican for my own self interest. Less taxes and all that. But now this new Trump/Republican tax plan come out and guess what, it complete is not good for me.
Can someone explain?
I thought liberals wanted their taxes raised to support those in need. All talk?
Only with other people's money.
And this is the truth!
The outcry among liberals because it will cost them a few dollars surfaces their hypocrisy.
Yet none of you conservatives will admit where the extra tax dollars are going. Why is that?
I'm still waiting for you libs to tell us how much extra you're willing to pay. About three cents?
Um, crickets.
Talking to conservatives is like banging one's head on the wall. On about eighteen threads liberals have patiently explained we'll gladly pay more IF that money goes to real stuff: cleaning up the environment, stopping climate change, fixing infrastructure, strengthening the support network for those with less. I'd pay an additional 10K.
BUT - and here's the brick wall parts A and B - this gives more money to the super wealthy and corporations and this thread isn't about that.
Well then Write a check to the treasury. You're still under the tax structure and spending of the Obama days, because the present administration's bill hasn't passed. Now get that checkbook out AND WRITE THE CHECK. Stop yakking and start doing.
Not pp. Typical idiot who has no understanding. There is no provision to write checks to Treasury. Besides you are missing the point that Libs want the money to be spent for the right causes. Just giving money to treasury without knowing what it will be spent on is not what we want. Got it? But idiots don't and will repeat again.
Actually there is a line on your Fed tax form allowing you to contribute to reduce the deficit. What you are saying is you want smaller government but only focused in the areas you see as important, or don’t ask me for more. That’s a pipe dream. This bill reduces taxes for those making under 90k by about 75%. If that’s not helping the poor, I don’t know what is. And don’t all people get their first 90k taxed at the really low rate too? Someone in the DC bubble or other high cost areas will never get it because they think 250k is poor
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.[/quote]
You and millions of others, pp. I hear you
The GOP apparently feels entitled to take the earnings and property of the middle class and give it to millionaires and billionaires. What about the corporate subsidies - where my hard earned tax dollars go to feed some profitable private company even more money? What about the infrastructure and other government expenditures that bolster industries across the is country - from manufacturing to agriculture to oil and gas? How does that figure for you?
If rich people steal and mooch, it's okay with you, isn't it.
Greedy hypocrite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.
You and millions of others, pp. I hear you
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m an upper middle class professional and a Democrat. For years I’ve been hearing that I should really be Republican for my own self interest. Less taxes and all that. But now this new Trump/Republican tax plan come out and guess what, it complete is not good for me.
Can someone explain?
I thought liberals wanted their taxes raised to support those in need. All talk?
Only with other people's money.
And this is the truth!
The outcry among liberals because it will cost them a few dollars surfaces their hypocrisy.
Yet none of you conservatives will admit where the extra tax dollars are going. Why is that?
I'm still waiting for you libs to tell us how much extra you're willing to pay. About three cents?
Um, crickets.
Talking to conservatives is like banging one's head on the wall. On about eighteen threads liberals have patiently explained we'll gladly pay more IF that money goes to real stuff: cleaning up the environment, stopping climate change, fixing infrastructure, strengthening the support network for those with less. I'd pay an additional 10K.
BUT - and here's the brick wall parts A and B - this gives more money to the super wealthy and corporations and this thread isn't about that.
Well then Write a check to the treasury. You're still under the tax structure and spending of the Obama days, because the present administration's bill hasn't passed. Now get that checkbook out AND WRITE THE CHECK. Stop yakking and start doing.
Not pp. Typical idiot who has no understanding. There is no provision to write checks to Treasury. Besides you are missing the point that Libs want the money to be spent for the right causes. Just giving money to treasury without knowing what it will be spent on is not what we want. Got it? But idiots don't and will repeat again.
Actually there is a line on your Fed tax form allowing you to contribute to reduce the deficit. What you are saying is you want smaller government but only focused in the areas you see as important, or don’t ask me for more. That’s a pipe dream. This bill reduces taxes for those making under 90k by about 75%. If that’s not helping the poor, I don’t know what is. And don’t all people get their first 90k taxed at the really low rate too? Someone in the DC bubble or other high cost areas will never get it because they think 250k is poor
Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m an upper middle class professional and a Democrat. For years I’ve been hearing that I should really be Republican for my own self interest. Less taxes and all that. But now this new Trump/Republican tax plan come out and guess what, it complete is not good for me.
Can someone explain?
I thought liberals wanted their taxes raised to support those in need. All talk?
Only with other people's money.
And this is the truth!
The outcry among liberals because it will cost them a few dollars surfaces their hypocrisy.
Yet none of you conservatives will admit where the extra tax dollars are going. Why is that?
I'm still waiting for you libs to tell us how much extra you're willing to pay. About three cents?
Um, crickets.
Talking to conservatives is like banging one's head on the wall. On about eighteen threads liberals have patiently explained we'll gladly pay more IF that money goes to real stuff: cleaning up the environment, stopping climate change, fixing infrastructure, strengthening the support network for those with less. I'd pay an additional 10K.
BUT - and here's the brick wall parts A and B - this gives more money to the super wealthy and corporations and this thread isn't about that.
Well then Write a check to the treasury. You're still under the tax structure and spending of the Obama days, because the present administration's bill hasn't passed. Now get that checkbook out AND WRITE THE CHECK. Stop yakking and start doing.
Not pp. Typical idiot who has no understanding. There is no provision to write checks to Treasury. Besides you are missing the point that Libs want the money to be spent for the right causes. Just giving money to treasury without knowing what it will be spent on is not what we want. Got it? But idiots don't and will repeat again.
Anonymous wrote:Obamacare - Highly "peer reviewed". All 3,000 pages.
Going tits up. LOLOLOL