Anonymous wrote:Unhooked kids do get into Ivies from the more competitive local publics--I know quite a few, including unhooked DC who got into a so-called top Ivy. ...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am still as to what, if anything, is new here. Everybody is clear that hooks: athlete, URM, celebrity and to various extent alumni. That is true across the board -- these kids have a high likelihood of getting in from anywhere. The question is, if you are unhooked, and there are 3-4 admissible hooked candidates from your school applying to Yale or whatever, does their presence significantly lower the chance of a high achieving unhooked kid relative to an unhooked kid in another school down the road? Does that differ by colleges, HYPS vs. the rest of Ivy League + Chicago + Duke, say ....
Yes, that is the challenge for the unhooked in classes populated with hooks. If your son or daughter is in a junior class with 1-2 recruited athletes and also 2-3 more kids who are overtly family and monetary hooked, that will foreclose on the chances for your unhooked and the other unhooked in the same class. ....
Anonymous wrote:The part that I can't tell is whether the hooked kids are actually blocking my kid's access to top schools or whether hardly anyone gets in without hooks of some kind (given DC suburban location). Perhaps all they are doing is lowering his chances from 25% to 10% at two or three specific reach schools. The latter would bother me much less given that most of this probably happens at ED and EA when the hooked kids are applying to only one school each at that point.
Anonymous wrote:The part that I can't tell is whether the hooked kids are actually blocking my kid's access to top schools or whether hardly anyone gets in without hooks of some kind (given DC suburban location). Perhaps all they are doing is lowering his chances from 25% to 10% at two or three specific reach schools. The latter would bother me much less given that most of this probably happens at ED and EA when the hooked kids are applying to only one school each at that point.
Anonymous wrote:Kids do get compared within the same school. I know this first hand. My kid got waitlisted and was told that he would get a spot if a better qualified candidate (at the same school)- better grades - turned it down. He didn't get in. That's life. Nobody thought the system was broken. Reasonable decision by the school. But it was a direct result of comparing two kids at the same school
Anonymous wrote:I am still as to what, if anything, is new here. Everybody is clear that hooks: athlete, URM, celebrity and to various extent alumni. That is true across the board -- these kids have a high likelihood of getting in from anywhere. The question is, if you are unhooked, and there are 3-4 admissible hooked candidates from your school applying to Yale or whatever, does their presence significantly lower the chance of a high achieving unhooked kid relative to an unhooked kid in another school down the road? Does that differ by colleges, HYPS vs. the rest of Ivy League + Chicago + Duke, say ....
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, maybe the point back wasn't blunt enough. The Sidwell 10-11 or my son's school 8 does nothing to disprove the "school quota" claim. The quota gets blown if - and only if - there are factors like recruited athletes or the types of alum donor kin the college can't say no to. Those statistical outliers are not a candle that burns for hope, and does nothing to prove there really isn't a hard cap for concentration to one quality prep. Remember, in New England there are at least a dozen boarding preps believing they are the special one, and in DC alone there are a few day preps thinking so as well. That doesn't make it so. The 8 to Yale from this boarding school one year over the usual 3 maybe 4 was explained by legacy big bucks, soccer, ice hockey and lacrosse...not by the very special talents of that class at that school on itself. I would impute with due respect that the Sidwell 10-11 was constituted with several super freaky prestige / big money / legacy / political hooks and then sports. To believe otherwise is nuts.
Anonymous wrote:Colleges have no choice but to compare kids within schools, because no college can really afford to concentrate away from other comparatives (geographical, gender/ethnic, recruited athletes, legacies with a bias to donors, etc.). Having a kid who was of equal merit to get into any school, who actually did apply to all 8 Ivies and got into 2, we realized that the algorithm is complicated down to the prep level. The reason why he didn't have a chance at Brown or Yale that year? Simple, the per diem for those spots went to a couple kids recruited for sports and a couple more who were donor legacies with a real family hook. We knew that going in, and could accept it in the end. I think at a school like Sidwell the parents should be informed enough to know there will be certain classes where the 8-ball rolls for against the general population of great candidates at certain Ivies on certain years, and you can predict that well in advance.
The college counselors aren't always honest arbiters. What are they supposed to say? Yes, you just spent a quarter mil on a private secondary education but you really should know now that the 2-3 spots at Brown in your son's class are a closed loop because of that soccer player and those two kids with the hooks? The reality is the queue is not a true one, and there are some ways the application folders jump from high piles to the skinny piles and we can all guess how that happens, and we all know how that applies or does not to our family situation. Our son didn't get into 6 Ivies, but is very happy at the one he did pull through at after being wait listed then finally admitted. It works out well for the very qualified kids at a great place. I think that is what matters most, and, of course, in the world today most of the desired professions require a graduate degree and the next rodeo always awaits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yale got a lot of criticism last year for admitting 1% of its student body from a single school.
From whom? Alumni? Donors? Who would even know how many admissions were sent to Sidwell, other than people in the Sidwell community? Do you think anyone at Sidwell complained?
Anonymous wrote:Yale got a lot of criticism last year for admitting 1% of its student body from a single school.