Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the greater publicity about start times and AAP, I'm surprised the level of concern about IB was this great.
The noise on the anonymous message board is not a good indicator. Probably just a couple people with mega-chips on their shoulders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Given the greater publicity about start times and AAP, I'm surprised the level of concern about IB was this great.
The noise on the anonymous message board is not a good indicator. Probably just a couple people with mega-chips on their shoulders.
Anonymous wrote:
Given the greater publicity about start times and AAP, I'm surprised the level of concern about IB was this great.
Anonymous wrote:
And a lot more people on that page supported not changing start times. It made no difference. Pages like that are just set up to let people feel like they are being heard.
You are probably correct about your last statement. However, you do understand that these questions are not mutually exclusive? There is no winner. Frankly, I'm for cutting lots of things: IB; start time change; FLES; AAP centers; most travel for Gatehouse; etc.etc.
And a lot more people on that page supported not changing start times. It made no difference. Pages like that are just set up to let people feel like they are being heard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Back on topic kiddos. The pp raised a valid point. If there are so many strong opinions about eliminating IB in FCPS, why has no one taken it to the school board?
Suggestions that FCPS scale back IB are being brought to the SB's attention and getting a lot of support.
https://fcps.uservoice.com/forums/302115-what-are-your-ideas-for-balancing-the-potential-1/filters/top?page=2
There are a lot of people feeding from the IB trough in FCPS, so it won't be easy. I'm sure some of the IB coordinators post on these boards about how great IB supposedly is; their jobs depend on it and it's not like they really have that much to do besides slapping their school's name on IBO marketing materials.
Posting comments that are likely never read or considered does not constitute bringing something to the school boards attention, and the number of "likes" does not equal getting a lot of support.
If you say so. It looks to me like a lot of people support cutting back on wasteful IB expenditures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Back on topic kiddos. The pp raised a valid point. If there are so many strong opinions about eliminating IB in FCPS, why has no one taken it to the school board?
Suggestions that FCPS scale back IB are being brought to the SB's attention and getting a lot of support.
https://fcps.uservoice.com/forums/302115-what-are-your-ideas-for-balancing-the-potential-1/filters/top?page=2
There are a lot of people feeding from the IB trough in FCPS, so it won't be easy. I'm sure some of the IB coordinators post on these boards about how great IB supposedly is; their jobs depend on it and it's not like they really have that much to do besides slapping their school's name on IBO marketing materials.
Posting comments that are likely never read or considered does not constitute bringing something to the school boards attention, and the number of "likes" does not equal getting a lot of support.
Posting comments that are likely never read or considered does not constitute bringing something to the school boards attention, and the number of "likes" does not equal getting a lot of support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Back on topic kiddos. The pp raised a valid point. If there are so many strong opinions about eliminating IB in FCPS, why has no one taken it to the school board?
Suggestions that FCPS scale back IB are being brought to the SB's attention and getting a lot of support.
https://fcps.uservoice.com/forums/302115-what-are-your-ideas-for-balancing-the-potential-1/filters/top?page=2
There are a lot of people feeding from the IB trough in FCPS, so it won't be easy. I'm sure some of the IB coordinators post on these boards about how great IB supposedly is; their jobs depend on it and it's not like they really have that much to do besides slapping their school's name on IBO marketing materials.
Anonymous wrote:Back on topic kiddos. The pp raised a valid point. If there are so many strong opinions about eliminating IB in FCPS, why has no one taken it to the school board?
Believe it or not, that makes a huge difference for my kids. Guess they're the only ones in FCPS who don't bounce out of bed at 5:45 a.m. each day. Why are people dragging up the time change. That ship has sailed -- and belatedly in this area compared to the rest of the country where people realized that abusing growing brains for the convenience of parents and traffic was kind of bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:
No clue, but I have a high schooler and honestly don't know a single parent who wanted the change, or a single parent who claims their high schooler is unable to fall asleep at a decent time.
I don't have a high schooler, but ditto to the rest.
My high school grad learned that he had to leave earlier on late start days because of the traffic. They've messed up the schedules for all the kids. Sure my kids would have liked to sleep in--but they also had busy after school activities.
The change is costing money to the county --for what? thirty or forty minutes?