jsteele wrote:I think you should be allowed a bit of stupidity in your private Twitter feed. An apology and public humiliation should be sufficient as long as the stupidity is not an ongoing pattern. One could argue that this woman's PR abilities were so dismal as to demonstrate she was not suitable for her job. But, I tend to think that a forced resignation was unnecessary, as is digging into her past.

I think zero tolerance for stupidity is probably not the standard to which we want to adhere. Life will soon be nothing more than hyping each other's controversial tweets. That said, I'm going to go tweet insults about all of you because I believe there is no such thing as bad publicity.

Anonymous wrote:Forget the children. Stack it on Mommy and Daddy, both low class liars.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that this junior staffer gets the boot for some intemperate remarks about the first daughters (though many agreed that they could have behaved better at the WH event), but no one seems outraged about an Arizona Cardinals player sending booty photos of Malia asking "when her prom?" (His live tweeting from a jury room wasn't too admirable either.)

The tolerance for thuggish behavior in the NFL continues unabated.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2858148/Arizona-Cardinals-defensive-end-Darnell-Dockett-reposts-awkward-picture-16-year-old-Malia-Obama-tweeting-INSIDE-jury-duty.html

So... slavery.

Anonymous wrote:

So.... you want to hang onto a story about a man who is dead, from 45 years ago.

It wasn't a "story". I was a little younger than Mary Jo and remember when it happened. It was awful that he got off on that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was shocked at how angry her post sounded. Never mind that it's the President's daughters she went after. She just came off as bat-sh*t crazy.

If you look at full-length photos of her it can be seen she's a fat ass, possible obese.

Interesting that liberals are ok with this description when it's for a conservative, but not for Lena Dunham.

Anonymous wrote:

So.... you want to hang onto a story about a man who is dead, from 45 years ago.

It wasn't a "story". I was a little younger than Mary Jo and remember when it happened. It was awful that he got off on that.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Classy. Is it right to interpret that his asking with her prom is as an inquiry as to when she turns 18?

http://www.complex.com/sports/2014/12/darnell-dockett-cardinals-de-posts-questionable-photo-malia-obama

Are you sure that he knew that was Malia? She is not identified in the picture as far as I can tell.

jsteele wrote:I think you should be allowed a bit of stupidity in your private Twitter feed. An apology and public humiliation should be sufficient as long as the stupidity is not an ongoing pattern. One could argue that this woman's PR abilities were so dismal as to demonstrate she was not suitable for her job. But, I tend to think that a forced resignation was unnecessary, as is digging into her past.

I think zero tolerance for stupidity is probably not the standard to which we want to adhere. Life will soon be nothing more than hyping each other's controversial tweets. That said, I'm going to go tweet insults about all of you because I believe there is no such thing as bad publicity.