Anonymous wrote:
People from France to African Americans are converting and in God's eyes their devotion is equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard of Christian missionary groups but I have never heard of Muslim missionary groups, have you? I worked with refugee Muslim families and they told me about Christian missionary groups on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. They are impoverished Muslim families and the familes tell me that Christian missionary groups sweep in, providing baskets of food and water but also quite a few brochures on "Jesus, our Savior." lol Honestly, Muslims NEVER want people to convert under compulsion or coercion. It has to be through revelation and divine guidance. Muslima was speaking in "flowery" terms not because she was proselytizing, but simply because she clearly is devoted and loves her faith. Nothing wrong with that! It just irritated the hell out of you that she spoke so positively about her faith, thats all.
I think Muslima and I have been informative and answered questions to the best of our ability. I think we've done a fine job. I'm glad that now this thread will permanently remain with links included for people to learn more about true Islam. My intention was never to convert anyone, but simply to remove some of the hatred and vile accusations against a religion that is dear to billions of people.
Please, just stop. Islam is ALL about conversion. You deny the "compulsion" part, and that lack of compulsion is probably true in many areas. But compulsion MOST DEFINITELY EXISTS in Muslim-run areas where non-Muslim dhimmis face economic sanctions for not converting, and where polytheists are subject to slavery for not converting (I'm thinking of Mauritania, for example).
You simply can't, and shouldn't feign, ignorance about Muslim efforts to convert people. For example, a mosque in Virginia leaves flyers on doorsteps (my non-Muslim coworker finds them on her doorstep) about Islam. Some flyers talk about the "truths of Islam" and one flyer even argued that Islam isn't really anti-dog (yes, I understand the various positions about cats vs. dogs, but I think we can all agree we don't want to get into that one.)
The fact that you and Muslima are deliberately painting a distorted picture of Islam is proof enough that you're trying to convert people. (Sorry, but a distorted picture is not "fine job" at all, and clarifying the distortions isn't "vile" unless you think the truth about your religion is "vile.") That, plus the fact that you're practically salivating over the prospect (completely fantastical and unsupported by any stats) of a Muslim on every block, speak more truly to your desire to convert.
(Also: "that's all" not "thats" all.)
Anonymous wrote:I have heard of Christian missionary groups but I have never heard of Muslim missionary groups, have you? I worked with refugee Muslim families and they told me about Christian missionary groups on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. They are impoverished Muslim families and the familes tell me that Christian missionary groups sweep in, providing baskets of food and water but also quite a few brochures on "Jesus, our Savior." lol Honestly, Muslims NEVER want people to convert under compulsion or coercion. It has to be through revelation and divine guidance. Muslima was speaking in "flowery" terms not because she was proselytizing, but simply because she clearly is devoted and loves her faith. Nothing wrong with that! It just irritated the hell out of you that she spoke so positively about her faith, thats all.
I think Muslima and I have been informative and answered questions to the best of our ability. I think we've done a fine job. I'm glad that now this thread will permanently remain with links included for people to learn more about true Islam. My intention was never to convert anyone, but simply to remove some of the hatred and vile accusations against a religion that is dear to billions of people.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, we all know about the Muslim obsession with making the whole world Muslim. That doesn't make it reality, though.
In any case, it seems really unlikely that Muslima's effort to proselytize on DCUM would have won any converts.
Note for future proselytizing efforts: don't present disingenuously rosy pictures of your religion, to the point that other posters have to come on repeatedly to correct the record. Also, when the argument doesn't go your way, don't act like a spoiled baby. Both of these behaviors create a terrible impression of your religion.
Anonymous wrote:
I will look for the evidence you seek regarding the numbers. Meanwhile, why devote so much to explaining that some percentage of Islam includes ghetto or African Americans? WTH? Why is the color of their skin or economic status noteworthy in discussing population numbers? Regardless of color of skin and economic status, they COUNT. Moreover, Islam does not care about the color of anyone's skin or economic status. People from France to African Americans are converting and in God's eyes their devotion is equal. Perhaps this is why so many African Americans do convert to Islam- they feel welcomed in Islam. However, what I described to you in previous pages was the face of the new Muslim. The new Muslim will be a blend of mixed races. And every successive generation will be more wealthy. Iranian Muslims, Arab Muslims, and Pakistan Muslims that are first generation are fairly wealthy and well educated. This pattern will continue. You would never recognize my kids as " Muslim" if you saw them. This is the new face of Islam. But the new generation is not losing their faith in the process of assimilation.
Soon there will be a Muslim on every block if not in every house. Everyone will know at least one Muslim. I am not trying to frighten you with this prediction; its simply the direction we are headed in. So its not wise to alienate such a large population by insults about our religion or references to people in our faith who live in ghetto's...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm done with the effort to be respectful. Let's rephrase, shall we? ISLAM PERMITS MUSLIM SOLDIERS TO RAPE NON-MUSLIM WOMEN CAPTIVES.
I haven't even begun to address this new accusation now about captives. Lets see..we went from Muhammad being a pedophile to Islam being unjust in divorce, testimony, inheritance, then the very noteworthy info that many converts are, gasp, African American, and poor too.. and not one of Muslima's or my explanations did you accept but now we're onto the topic of captives, are we?
And all of that was you being respectful?
I never addressed the point about Mary that you or others brought up because I thought it moot. Isn't Mary equally revered in the Christian faith? Do Christians not pray to Mary also? Are there not statues of Mary around or in Christian places of worship? If Muhammad was a pedophile in (brace yourself, its coming again) 600 AD, then why do you say "Hail Mary" prayers and have statues of her in your churches given the disgrace of becoming pregnant, particularly in that time, with no husband?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like your fantasy more than any possible reality.
Also, why did you assume PP's reference to African American converts was somehow pejorative? I didn't read it that way. This seems to be your problem, not hers.
Also, ghettos not ghetto's.
So why mention it? And why mention ghettos? Just lunchtime table convo?
Anonymous wrote:
I'm done with the effort to be respectful. Let's rephrase, shall we? ISLAM PERMITS MUSLIM SOLDIERS TO RAPE NON-MUSLIM WOMEN CAPTIVES.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds like your fantasy more than any possible reality.
Also, why did you assume PP's reference to African American converts was somehow pejorative? I didn't read it that way. This seems to be your problem, not hers.
Also, ghettos not ghetto's.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[
Obviously, I've embarrassed you by pointing out your "UNconsensual." It wasn't a typo either, but I think you already know that. I have no shameless hypocrisy. I do have great respect for Mary. But I have no qualms about using her to illustrate the lunacy of the accusation against another important figure to me. There is no truth to my suggestion that Jesus's birth was a disgrace to her. It was merely to illustrate the weakness in your own (or others) argument that Muhammad must have been a pedophile.
I am not "putting myself out as some sort of representative of Islam." I'm standing up to vile criticism about a very important religious figure to me. If you can not write properly or defend your points well, sit down.
Speaking of bad logic, you still fail to see a key distinction between Mary and Mohammed that several posters have pointed out to you. Or, you're pretending not to see it. I'll put it in caps, because it seems so necessary for you. MARY HAD NO CHOICE IN BECOMING PREGNANT. MOHAMMAD HAD A CHOICE ABOUT THE 9-YEAR-OLD GIRL, AISHA.
Also, I regret now that I ever tried to be respectful to you, and consistently referred to Islam's treatment of women captives as "non-consensual sex." (99% of the time! Except for that single blip!) I think it's sort of funny, and very revealing, that you keep harping on UNCONSENSUAL, because the moderator can confirm I'm on an iPad, and the record of the many, many times I said "non-consensual" is there for anybody to see. Everybody reading this understands what's really going on: you're angry, but you have no real arguments in response to the multiple holes several of us have poked in your so-called "logic." No, you haven't embarrassed me--you're embarrassing yourself, because you're like a child who loses an argument and starts calling people names.
I'm done with the effort to be respectful. Let's rephrase, shall we? ISLAM PERMITS MUSLIM SOLDIERS TO RAPE NON-MUSLIM WOMEN CAPTIVES.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like your fantasy more than any possible reality.
Also, why did you assume PP's reference to African American converts was somehow pejorative? I didn't read it that way. This seems to be your problem, not hers.
Also, ghettos not ghetto's.
Also, you used ellipses wrong at the very end. You should have four dots, three for the ellipsis and one for the period at the end of the sentence.
You're welcome. And if it works for you, keep fantasizing about how Islam will conquer the world and win every argument in some imagined future.
Signed, Unconsensual.
Anonymous wrote:
Soon there will be a Muslim on every block if not in every house. Everyone will know at least one Muslim. I am not trying to frighten you with this prediction; its simply the direction we are headed in. So its not wise to alienate such a large population by insults about our religion or references to people in our faith who live in ghetto's...
Anonymous wrote:This sounds like your fantasy more than any possible reality.
Also, why did you assume PP's reference to African American converts was somehow pejorative? I didn't read it that way. This seems to be your problem, not hers.
Also, ghettos not ghetto's.