Anonymous wrote:http://educationnext.org/if-you-send-your-kid-to-a-failing-school-you-are-a-bad-person/
I didn't think I could like this guy any less but then I just read this and now I do.
And now I will take the advice of Lisa Simpson and look away, look away, look away...
Anonymous wrote:Can someone who knows what candidates education policies are start a new thread and describe them? If there is do done so inclined, many sound surely appreciate it.
Anonymous wrote:Not to beat a dead horse but this Op Ed just kills me. We've lived in EOTP/WOTR since before our kids were born and they are well into grade school. Along the way, many of our neighbors with kids have decamped to Maryland and Virginia for better schools, and I don't begrudge their choices. We have chosen to stay and go the charter route and we are lucky to be at a great charter that happens to be quite diverse. That said, we constantly struggle with whether we are doing right by our kids by not leaving DC. Then along comes Mr. Petrilli who, after doing similar soul searching, decided to move to BETHESDA and tells those of us who chose to stay that we somehow part of a "problem". What a HYPOCRITE!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird to see Petrilli proposing this. Fordham has been a strong backer of charters, yet this would essentially undermine the charters.
In addition to his book, he also penned a blog posting in their newsletter that suggested that higher SES families could do more to benefit lower SES families in their IB school but not enrolling there at all, and finding a better fit at a charter or other school. Rationale being that, higher SES parents might push more "progressive" educational approaches on the school which could undermine its efforts to deliver more "back to basics" and other approaches catered to lower SES families. This new push for diverisyt in neighborhood schools seems to contradict his earlier post.
Link?
Anonymous wrote:My favorite insinuation was that we were "squeezed out of schools west of the park and unable to afford private schools."
No other alternatives you could think of?
1. Not interested in schools west of the Park.
2. Able to afford private and not going to send my kid there.
3. Committed to DCPS/public schools.
4. Convinced of the school's educational model.
5. Not worried about child's ability to learn.
6. Committed to making a better DC...
Not all of us are down for all of that, but for many at least part of that is the truth. And this guy thinks we do what we do because west-of-the-Park shut us out or we're poor?