Anonymous wrote:Look here for definitions of HG, PG on curret tests (SB 5 and WISC IV). http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/highly_profoundly.htm
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have his IQ scores.
Why do you have his IQ scores? I'm not being snarky; I'm sincerely curious. My children have never been tested for IQ. I've never been tested for IQ, as far as I know.
Not the PP you're asking, but we had our kid's IQ scores as well. He's been tested twice. The first time was at age 5, the day after K ended, and was part of our own investigation into what was going on with our suddenly very unhappy, very distressed child who had, in the second half of the school year, been getting in trouble for all sorts of behavior like bothering classmates, walking away from assignments, etc. Result of that test: highly to profoundly gifted. Age equivalency of anywhere from 8 (in his weakest area) to 24 (in his strongest area). Armed with this knowledge we made some changes in his life, resulting in a much happier kid who rarely got in trouble anymore. Probably the most valuable thing we've ever learned about our kid because it helped us to get to WHY he was acting and feeling the way he was.
The second time was a year later (age 6) as part of the application process for a program for highly/profoundly gifted kids. Result: higher score than before and well over their 145 minimum requirement. He'll be attending the program next year beginning in 2nd grade.
Neither testing episode had anything to do with our parental egos. In the first case we were doing the academic equivalent of testing for a variety of diseases that could be causing his symptoms. In the second case the testing was part of seeking the appropriate treatment for the disease.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why the eye rolls? Disbelief? Those age equivalencies come straight from the psychologist report. We were pretty surprised, but we managed not to roll our eyes three times.
Your quoted sentence above that is bolded required many more eye rolls but my hands got tired.
I literally LOLed. Who was the 'doctor" who administered the test?
I am not sure why you won't believe this poster. She said her results and I have no reason to believe that anyone would wish to lie on an anonymous board. This board and particularly this thread is not a random sample. Only people who has an interest in gifted education will look at it. Okay, let me rephrase. It draws only two type of people. People who has a gifted child and people who hate people who say they have a gifted child.
Anonymous wrote:^^ no reason to believe anyone would lie.
Ha ha. This is the interwebz. People lie for fun.
Anonymous wrote:^^ no reason to believe anyone would lie.
Ha ha. This is the interwebz. People lie for fun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have his IQ scores.
Why do you have his IQ scores? I'm not being snarky; I'm sincerely curious. My children have never been tested for IQ. I've never been tested for IQ, as far as I know.
Not the PP you're asking, but we had our kid's IQ scores as well. He's been tested twice. The first time was at age 5, the day after K ended, and was part of our own investigation into what was going on with our suddenly very unhappy, very distressed child who had, in the second half of the school year, been getting in trouble for all sorts of behavior like bothering classmates, walking away from assignments, etc. Result of that test: highly to profoundly gifted. Age equivalency of anywhere from 8 (in his weakest area) to 24 (in his strongest area). Armed with this knowledge we made some changes in his life, resulting in a much happier kid who rarely got in trouble anymore. Probably the most valuable thing we've ever learned about our kid because it helped us to get to WHY he was acting and feeling the way he was.
The second time was a year later (age 6) as part of the application process for a program for highly/profoundly gifted kids. Result: higher score than before and well over their 145 minimum requirement. He'll be attending the program next year beginning in 2nd grade.
Neither testing episode had anything to do with our parental egos. In the first case we were doing the academic equivalent of testing for a variety of diseases that could be causing his symptoms. In the second case the testing was part of seeking the appropriate treatment for the disease.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why the eye rolls? Disbelief? Those age equivalencies come straight from the psychologist report. We were pretty surprised, but we managed not to roll our eyes three times.
Your quoted sentence above that is bolded required many more eye rolls but my hands got tired.
I literally LOLed. Who was the 'doctor" who administered the test?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow...what are the chances that there are...what 4 or 5 kids who are profoundly gifted in this area which is rare...and their parents are all on this site responding to this thread? Um...zilch. These kids aren't profoundly gifted....not saying there weren't told that.
We're having some definitional problems. Some people use the terms this way:
120 - 140 = gifted
140 - 160 = highly gifted
160+ = profoundly gifted
Some people add additional levels "moderately gifted," "exceptionally gifted," and "profoundly gifted" with PG being reserved for IQ scores over 180.
If you use the 160 definition, you'll have a PG kid in every 10,000 students on average. Given the SES of DCUM, it's probably higher for this sample. You also draw parents from outside the area to this board.
Anonymous wrote:Wow...what are the chances that there are...what 4 or 5 kids who are profoundly gifted in this area which is rare...and their parents are all on this site responding to this thread? Um...zilch. These kids aren't profoundly gifted....not saying there weren't told that.
Anonymous wrote:Wow...what are the chances that there are...what 4 or 5 kids who are profoundly gifted in this area which is rare...and their parents are all on this site responding to this thread? Um...zilch. These kids aren't profoundly gifted....not saying there weren't told that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have his IQ scores.
Why do you have his IQ scores? I'm not being snarky; I'm sincerely curious. My children have never been tested for IQ. I've never been tested for IQ, as far as I know.
Not the PP you're asking, but we had our kid's IQ scores as well. He's been tested twice. The first time was at age 5, the day after K ended, and was part of our own investigation into what was going on with our suddenly very unhappy, very distressed child who had, in the second half of the school year, been getting in trouble for all sorts of behavior like bothering classmates, walking away from assignments, etc. Result of that test: highly to profoundly gifted. Age equivalency of anywhere from 8 (in his weakest area) to 24 (in his strongest area). Armed with this knowledge we made some changes in his life, resulting in a much happier kid who rarely got in trouble anymore. Probably the most valuable thing we've ever learned about our kid because it helped us to get to WHY he was acting and feeling the way he was.
The second time was a year later (age 6) as part of the application process for a program for highly/profoundly gifted kids. Result: higher score than before and well over their 145 minimum requirement. He'll be attending the program next year beginning in 2nd grade.
Neither testing episode had anything to do with our parental egos. In the first case we were doing the academic equivalent of testing for a variety of diseases that could be causing his symptoms. In the second case the testing was part of seeking the appropriate treatment for the disease.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why the eye rolls? Disbelief? Those age equivalencies come straight from the psychologist report. We were pretty surprised, but we managed not to roll our eyes three times.
Your quoted sentence above that is bolded required many more eye rolls but my hands got tired.