Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course this YY parent would like more two-way immersion...don't know of any YY parent who would be against this.
This YY parent knows boatloads of others who would be against two-way if it hurt their chances of being admitted, which of course it would unless the school and DCPC were doing something radically different. They might not say so, but they wouldn't support dual immersion. They just want a decent school (better than most IB on Capitol Hill, in Petworth, or wherever) where their kid learns more than a little of a foreign language. They get that and they're satisfied. You are an unusually sophisticated and Chinese-minded YY parent to want more!
You're saying that parents whose children have already been admitted are afraid that they'll be shut out? How is that possible?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course this YY parent would like more two-way immersion...don't know of any YY parent who would be against this.
This YY parent knows boatloads of others who would be against two-way if it hurt their chances of being admitted, which of course it would unless the school and DCPC were doing something radically different. They might not say so, but they wouldn't support dual immersion. They just want a decent school (better than most IB on Capitol Hill, in Petworth, or wherever) where their kid learns more than a little of a foreign language. They get that and they're satisfied. You are an unusually sophisticated and Chinese-minded YY parent to want more!
You're saying that parents whose children have already been admitted are afraid that they'll be shut out? How is that possible?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not have firsthand knowledge, but piecing together from this thread and what I've read elsewhere on DCUM, it sounds like their charter was threatened recently when the many stories of this dual lottery were not going away, and they reluctantly now are clear that they only have one lottery and do not give language preference (which is the part that is against the charters). If they are still cheating, I'd guess they are risking their charter, but that is basically just a guess given what I've read here and heard elsewhere.
Lamb, like YY, is one of the charter boards darlings. Nothing will happen to them if they continue to circumvent the process and cheat. Are you kidding, the DCUM crowd may do something violent. And, I am a parent of one of these charters.
Wrong. The question put them in jeopardy, so they removed it. You clearly have no firsthand experience with the PCSB,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course this YY parent would like more two-way immersion...don't know of any YY parent who would be against this.
This YY parent knows boatloads of others who would be against two-way if it hurt their chances of being admitted, which of course it would unless the school and DCPC were doing something radically different. They might not say so, but they wouldn't support dual immersion. They just want a decent school (better than most IB on Capitol Hill, in Petworth, or wherever) where their kid learns more than a little of a foreign language. They get that and they're satisfied. You are an unusually sophisticated and Chinese-minded YY parent to want more!
Anonymous wrote:Of course this YY parent would like more two-way immersion...don't know of any YY parent who would be against this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: She is speaking for herself, huffy-Stokes-parent.
In the same vein, maybe you should consider speaking for your own school, not YY? Since you're not there, and don't know the school or us. Nobody's rejecting cultural inputs, and no teachers are nervous. Do you believe everything that you read on anonymous fora on the internet? The vast majority of YY parents would love 2-way immersion, but we can't change the law any more than you can. Why the chip on your shoulder? Is it because Stokes is the least desirable of the immersion charter schools? What we can do, is start a language MS/HS that your children can attend. You're welcome.
New poster and outsider. Love 2-way immersion? Well, that's not exactly the impression you folks give on DCUM. The Spanish immersion parents, yes. I've been through many YY threads, mostly from S. China, were I work for the USG, wondering if my half-ethnic, Mandarin-speaking toddler would be at home there on my next DC post. Correct me if I'm wrong (like OP) but the undercurrent of resentment and dislike of local Chinese immigrants sounds strong. The only bilingual family we knew at YY dropped out, happy to land IB. Those Cantonese speakers can be really annoying, granted, knowing my in-laws....
Anonymous wrote: She is speaking for herself, huffy-Stokes-parent.
In the same vein, maybe you should consider speaking for your own school, not YY? Since you're not there, and don't know the school or us. Nobody's rejecting cultural inputs, and no teachers are nervous. Do you believe everything that you read on anonymous fora on the internet? The vast majority of YY parents would love 2-way immersion, but we can't change the law any more than you can. Why the chip on your shoulder? Is it because Stokes is the least desirable of the immersion charter schools? What we can do, is start a language MS/HS that your children can attend. You're welcome.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As long as you're part of the system, you have to play by the rules.
Spare us your holier than thou rant. Get back to me at AP language test time and college acceptances season. That's when our FARMs Spanish and English speakers are going to shine.
Anonymous wrote:Lamb parent who does care, really cares, among many others.
I turned down a YY PreK spot. Strange school where most of the admins don't even speak the target language, a bilingual kid is hard to find and, yes, few parents seem to care. If DC Charter moves to revoke Lamb's charter, which won't surprise me, many of us here say bring it on. There are dual-immersion public school Spanish programs in this very city with 2 lotteries at a time when the lines between DCPC and DCPS are starting to blur. If DC Charter doesn't want us, maybe DCPS does and we'd be better off under their auspices long-term. Our admins feel strongly enough about keeping the percentage of native speakers high, with parental support, that they don't fear the future.
LAMB & YY & MV don't fear the future either. THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE TWO LOTTERIES. Only DCPS is allowed to do that. Oh God, but you are dense.Anonymous wrote:Lamb parent who does care, really cares, among many others.
I turned down a YY PreK spot. Strange school where most of the admins don't even speak the target language, a bilingual kid is hard to find and, yes, few parents seem to care. If DC Charter moves to revoke Lamb's charter, which won't surprise me, many of us here say bring it on. There are dual-immersion public school Spanish programs in this very city with 2 lotteries at a time when the lines between DCPC and DCPS are starting to blur. If DC Charter doesn't want us, maybe DCPS does and we'd be better off under their auspices long-term. Our admins feel strongly enough about keeping the percentage of native speakers high, with parental support, that they don't fear the future.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sure LAMB can get sneaky and look at a child's last name or in some cases their first name and can see who may be of Hispanic origin. In some mysterious way they may be able to weed out others. This is just a thought and this is why child child's name is hyphenated since her dad is of Hispanic decent.