Anonymous wrote:Who is upset?
I have read a lot of unvarnished plain and matter of fact common sense.
And then I have read way far more nonsense over all the intelligent children of posters who never prep. And than have the audacity to assert test preparation is unethical while dragging their snowflakes to athletic fields and pools for intensive test prep.
Anonymous wrote:
What is being said is that "test prep," defined as doing standardized test questions over and over again ... can enable one to increase one's test score, but not necessarily one's overall intelligence.
defined as doing standardized test questions over and over again (by doing practice tests released, usually, by the testing company, but sometimes obtained by other means)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can that be? Intelligence is what you are born with? It is fixed and doesn't change up or down. My kids were born with high intelligence. They got into AAP without studying or prepping. I'm sure they will ace all their tests through the Ivy League. Some kids are born gifted, just like Phelps, but I don't understanded why he had to train and prep , much harder than the non gifted swimmers. Oh well.
+1. Well said.
In fact, there is no need for school at all for those with such intelligence. I think I will take my trip on many field trips... how many is it again that I can get away with?
Anonymous wrote:No one is saying studying in general is a bad thing. One does not grow up without training to be a scientist. However, studying should be for the long term goal. There is no way to study for the CogAT and NNAT; you can prep for them by doing repeated practice tests (which some people do). That does not have long-term benefit.
Anonymous wrote:How can that be? Intelligence is what you are born with? It is fixed and doesn't change up or down. My kids were born with high intelligence. They got into AAP without studying or prepping. I'm sure they will ace all their tests through the Ivy League. Some kids are born gifted, just like Phelps, but I don't understanded why he had to train and prep , much harder than the non gifted swimmers. Oh well.
Studying improves test performance. It's not really a hard concept to grasp.
Although Michael Phelps may have been a poor example, a talented athlete does need to train to improve performance. The same goes for academics.
I had a childhood friend who was truly brilliant. She aced every math exam. I think she scored like 1500+ on her SATs when she was in 7th grade. She blew off high school and barely got into college. Til this day she doesn't have a college degree and is now a bartender.
Anonymous wrote:It's funny how we keep getting back to the advertising phrases that test prep businesses use to sell their products. Interesting.
It is even funnier that some believe it is ethical (even laudable) for an athlete to train and prepare for a test but unethical for a student to train and prepare for a test to improve physical or mental performance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep begging if you do not understand the concept of triage.
Are you suggesting the limitation of resources in the county prevents public schools from providing appropriate level of education for everyone? Is the AAP program more resource intensive than the general ed program? Does TJ have a bigger budget than the other high schools in the county?[/quote
At least in our school, I would be surprised if AAP classes were a bigger drain on the budget than Gen Ed. There is an AA resource teacher who spends some time in the class, but he also does lower grade enrichment, lII & L3 pull out, etc. He spends some time in every classroom, not just AAP. The AAP teachers often also get additional certification, which is also a cost. BUT, kids in the AAP class usually (but not always) do not need Instructional Aides (in our school, kids with behavioral and intellectual challenges are mainstreamed, but have their own IAs in class with them), ESOL, special Ed/ Autism services, reading & math remediation, social workers, etc., so in some ways, the AAP class is probably less resource intensive. The classes also tend to be large, b/c all qualified kids have to be given slots.
Additionally, challenging kids who are otherwise bored and acting out & understanding common issues with GT kids improves their behavior a lot, so they are less of a drain on school resources. My DS, for example, has a sensory integration disorder and also had problems in k-2 in categories like listening, following directions, and playing well with others. He really blossomed in third grade AAP, and we discovered that SI issues are common in GT boys, so his teachers have known how to work with him. And we no longer need to spend so much time working with his teachers, assistant principal, guidance counselor, school psychologist, etc. and they are freed up to work with other kids.
Before someone points this out,I should say that, of course, AAP kids have learning disabilities, Aspbergers, Social service needs, etc., but my observation is that these issues are often a barrier to AAP placement.