Anonymous wrote:
Wow, and they say women aren't supportive of each others choices.
Here's a thought for the interviewers out there: perhaps you should have a bit of compassion knowing that the woman in front of you realizes that she's at risk of ridicule for her choice to stay home. Maybe she's nervous that her choice to SAH (which she probably agonized over at some point) will now be used against her. If it's so had to muster this compassion, perhaps you might think of the time(s) that a SAHM saved your ass by picking up your kid when you were working late, watched your kid on the playground, or in some other way pitched in for you. Wouldn't that be so much better than being an embittered hag waiting for your chance to mock this woman's choice?
Anonymous wrote:Shocking, I just got back into the work force 2 years ago after 8 years being at home with the kids. It took me a whole 2 months to find work and I had two offers to choose from. I'm in IT sales to the feds and am pulling in 300k/yr-more than I ever imagined by hitting my sales goals each quarter.
I picked sales because I'm outgoing, confident, and not too hard on the eyes. I also primarily wanted to WFH so I could get the kids off the bus. I also was up front about my family in the interview process. The hiring manager (a man) has a SAHW and we related in the interview process around children.
Sorry to rain on your bitter party, but it was pretty wonderful to be home while my children were small and jump back to wiotk wtih a high salary upside, in a family friendly career.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh come on now PP. Can't meet the demands of parenting and a career? You know that's not why the majority of women who SAH do it. And most do it temporarily. Come on now.
Seriously, do you keep missing the point on purpose? We're talking about those few idiots who say as much in their interviews with statements like those iterated on the very first page of this thread. Statements that imply that it is either impossible or unacceptable to work while raising young children.
This is getting old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh come on now PP. Can't meet the demands of parenting and a career? You know that's not why the majority of women who SAH do it. And most do it temporarily. Come on now.
Seriously, do you keep missing the point on purpose? We're talking about those few idiots who say as much in their interviews with statements like those iterated on the very first page of this thread. Statements that imply that it is either impossible or unacceptable to work while raising young children.
This is getting old.
Anonymous wrote:..... and this thread is just another example of how women bend over backwards to conform themselves to a typical man's lifestyle instead of trying to change the workplace to fit the realities of women's lives.... Until the latter happens things will not change for women.
Anonymous wrote:Oh come on now PP. Can't meet the demands of parenting and a career? You know that's not why the majority of women who SAH do it. And most do it temporarily. Come on now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I interviewed a lovely woman who explained a four year gap in her resume by saying that she took time off as the only child to care for her terminally ill mother. Had no problem hiring her (and she's doing great!). That's way different that a SAHP situation though.
Why is it different for purposes of hiring and employment?
Because the mother is dead. The kids that caused the mom to SAH are presumably still alive.
If you are suggesting that you'd not hire a woman specifically because she still has kids at home ... you should be aware that you may be violating the law. You can't discriminate based on your stereotypes about working mothers; that's gender discrimination. In fact, your hypothetical example (that you'd hire a woman who took time off to care for her dying mother, but not a woman who took time off to care for kids still at home) would be very good evidence against you in court.
http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/caregiving.html
Anonymous wrote:Read her post. She didn't bring that up in the interview. She said it in her post to explain part of why she likes sales. She didn't say she was gorgeous. She said she's "easy on the eyes"- I don't find that one comment a reason to dismiss her entire point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I interviewed a lovely woman who explained a four year gap in her resume by saying that she took time off as the only child to care for her terminally ill mother. Had no problem hiring her (and she's doing great!). That's way different that a SAHP situation though.
Why is it different for purposes of hiring and employment?
Because the mother is dead. The kids that caused the mom to SAH are presumably still alive.
Anonymous wrote:Those of you who are jumping all over 15:58 are saying more about yourselves in your threads than about her. Why can't you just acknowledge that SAHM's can actually be competent professionals and can get themselves back in the workforce if they present themselves well? No, instead you're insinuating that she got her job because the hiring guy had the hots for her. That's real mature. Yet you turn around and ask for respect for choosing to WOH- and you deserve respect- but respect goes both ways.