Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves. Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes. This is simple. You ignore the lying to the donors part.

Meanwhile in reality, 501(c)(3) nonprofits can and do pay informants. There is no blanket prohibition. IRS rules explicitly allow 501(c)(3) organizations to pay "informers" or tipsters for information on criminal activity when it supports their charitable mission (e.g., alleviating burdens on government by fighting crime or extremism).

Sorry, forgot the source: the federal tax code. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2)

I don't see where the word "informer" is used or there is any language that would explicitly permit that activity. Can you show me what I'm missing?

You do know that money laundering is a crime? And, if you are paying "informants" to agitate and pay for transportation, that is a problem.

My retired AUSA source said that from reading the indictment that they likely have documentation and witnesses. He thinks it is likely someone from within the organization. He also said this will be a long time before trial. He said that there must be lots of "F" people from the numbers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves. Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes. This is simple. You ignore the lying to the donors part.

Meanwhile in reality, 501(c)(3) nonprofits can and do pay informants. There is no blanket prohibition. IRS rules explicitly allow 501(c)(3) organizations to pay "informers" or tipsters for information on criminal activity when it supports their charitable mission (e.g., alleviating burdens on government by fighting crime or extremism).

Sorry, forgot the source: the federal tax code. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2)

I don't see where the word "informer" is used or there is any language that would explicitly permit that activity. Can you show me what I'm missing?

You do know that money laundering is a crime? And, if you are paying "informants" to agitate and pay for transportation, that is a problem.

My retired AUSA source said that from reading the indictment that they likely have documentation and witnesses. He thinks it is likely someone from within the organization. He also said this will be a long time before trial. He said that there must be lots of "F" people from the numbers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves. Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes. This is simple. You ignore the lying to the donors part.

Meanwhile in reality, 501(c)(3) nonprofits can and do pay informants. There is no blanket prohibition. IRS rules explicitly allow 501(c)(3) organizations to pay "informers" or tipsters for information on criminal activity when it supports their charitable mission (e.g., alleviating burdens on government by fighting crime or extremism).

Sorry, forgot the source: the federal tax code. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2)

I don't see where the word "informer" is used or there is any language that would explicitly permit that activity. Can you show me what I'm missing?

You do know that money laundering is a crime? And, if you are paying "informants" to agitate and pay for transportation, that is a problem.

My retired AUSA source said that from reading the indictment that they likely have documentation and witnesses. He thinks it is likely someone from within the organization. He also said this will be a long time before trial. He said that there must be lots of "F" people from the numbers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves. Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes. This is simple. You ignore the lying to the donors part.

Meanwhile in reality, 501(c)(3) nonprofits can and do pay informants. There is no blanket prohibition. IRS rules explicitly allow 501(c)(3) organizations to pay "informers" or tipsters for information on criminal activity when it supports their charitable mission (e.g., alleviating burdens on government by fighting crime or extremism).

Sorry, forgot the source: the federal tax code. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2)

I don't see where the word "informer" is used or there is any language that would explicitly permit that activity. Can you show me what I'm missing?

Anonymous wrote:The FBI pays confidential informers in the KKK and other terrorists groups.

The overt corruption of the GOP is so crass that it boggles the mind. Nixon was a choir boy compared to this administration and the Republicans in Congress whom over and protect them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:US Representative Steve Scalise, The Family Research Council, Turning Point USA - all groups or individuals that the SPLC had added to its “racist organizations” list, which were all subsequently attacked within months of being added to the list by violent leftists.

In the case of Charlie Kirk - he was assassinated by a progressive identifying sniper just 12 weeks after being declared “a racist” by the SPLC.


Sounds like the SPLC was providing targeting data for violent liberals to act on.


I suspect this indictment is part of a larger strategy to get various individuals within the organization to flip and turn informants to avoid jail time for crimes associated with the funding of domestic terrorists , in exchange for further testimony revealing the group’s actual goals of identifying political enemies and encouraging violent extremists to target them.

That’s the real reason for the indictments.

It was one domestic terrorist killed by another maga domestic terrorist because they were from rival factions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPLC is irrelevant

When was the last time they did any good for the US?

The SPLC cooperates with, and delivers training to, law enforcement agencies, focusing "on the history, background, leaders, and activities of far-right extremists in the United States". The FBI has partnered with the SPLC "to establish rapport, share information, address concerns, and cooperate in solving problems."

MAGA sez Back the Blue! Thin Blue Line! We Love Law-n-Order!

They won’t after this; they have been exposed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SPLC is irrelevant

When was the last time they did any good for the US?

The SPLC cooperates with, and delivers training to, law enforcement agencies, focusing "on the history, background, leaders, and activities of far-right extremists in the United States". The FBI has partnered with the SPLC "to establish rapport, share information, address concerns, and cooperate in solving problems."

MAGA sez Back the Blue! Thin Blue Line! We Love Law-n-Order!

Anonymous wrote:The FBI pays confidential informers in the KKK and other terrorists groups.

The overt corruption of the GOP is so crass that it boggles the mind. Nixon was a choir boy compared to this administration and the Republicans in Congress whom over and protect them.

Anonymous wrote:The FBI pays confidential informers in the KKK and other terrorists groups.

The overt corruption of the GOP is so crass that it boggles the mind. Nixon was a choir boy compared to this administration and the Republicans in Congress whom over and protect them.

Anonymous wrote:SPLC is irrelevant

When was the last time they did any good for the US?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up.

This!

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves. Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes. This is simple. You ignore the lying to the donors part.

Meanwhile in reality, 501(c)(3) nonprofits can and do pay informants. There is no blanket prohibition. IRS rules explicitly allow 501(c)(3) organizations to pay "informers" or tipsters for information on criminal activity when it supports their charitable mission (e.g., alleviating burdens on government by fighting crime or extremism).

Sorry, forgot the source: the federal tax code. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2)

I don't see where the word "informer" is used or there is any language that would explicitly permit that activity. Can you show me what I'm missing?

Anonymous wrote:US Representative Steve Scalise, The Family Research Council, Turning Point USA - all groups or individuals that the SPLC had added to its “racist organizations” list, which were all subsequently attacked within months of being added to the list by violent leftists.

In the case of Charlie Kirk - he was assassinated by a progressive identifying sniper just 12 weeks after being declared “a racist” by the SPLC.


Sounds like the SPLC was providing targeting data for violent liberals to act on.


I suspect this indictment is part of a larger strategy to get various individuals within the organization to flip and turn informants to avoid jail time for crimes associated with the funding of domestic terrorists, in exchange for further testimony revealing the group’s actual goals of identifying political enemies and encouraging violent extremists to target them.

That’s the real reason for the indictments.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's sick and disgusting that sleazy dishonest MAGAs are now trying to peddle a narrative that right wing extremism doesn't exist and is purely a fabrication of SPLC. They are trying to destroy the people trying to expose extremism rather than having DOJ do its job to investigate. SPLC is investigating extremism because DOJ has and continues to fail us. This dishonest spin is dangerous for America.

This investigation began because banks reported questionable transactions. And it began under Biden, but he shut it down. I think we know why.