Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

I saw an interview with her once where she was like “this ass looks pretty good for 50, right?” And she slapped herself on the butt. That’s what this dress is saying.

Her ass doesn’t look that good, though. I actually like the stark simplicity of the front for a woman of a certain age. But the side view is tragic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.

Anonymous wrote:Sigourney Weaver, fantastic job

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

I saw an interview with her once where she was like “this ass looks pretty good for 50, right?” And she slapped herself on the butt. That’s what this dress is saying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone watching. I just saw Kelly Ripa. I love the dress, but the top is a no-go. Especially because of her flat chest, all I can think about when I look at this is "flat as a board". It looks a little softer in this picture; when I watched her on the red carpet, the top part looked very stiff and flat.

She looks gorgeous as it is. Everyone doesn't need or want implants.

+1

She's very pretty but her body looks like a young teen boy.

So? I'm also pretty flat chested and petite. I don't see what the problem is. Beauty comes in all shapes and sizes.

Also flat chested and I hate that dress. I think it’s because aesthetics is about balance and contrast so if you take an angular flat surfaced person and put them in an angular flat surfaced dress, it’s not visually pleasing. Something that creates more curve or movement would be more visually appealing. I’m not saying she needs falsies — just that something that is more fluid would look better. I actually don’t think that dress would look good on anyone though. Unfortunate because it’s otherwise a nice dress.

+1 and adding that the neckline hits the absolute widest part of her which is why it’s so bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also beautiful and interesting without being weird: Kate Hudson

I love the color and the fabric/beadwork, but dislike the neckline and stiff peplum. It just doesn't move with her at all and she looked like a paper doll in it.

It was actually somewhat reminiscent of a paler, floppier peplum dress that Emma Stone wore a couple years ago (when she won). I didn't like that one either!

Still, great color. Wish it was a more straightforward sheet with maybe a sweetheart or cutaway neckline.

Speaking of Emma Stone, this was low key and good. I would like it better in a color.

Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.

Anonymous wrote:Did we talk about the Bridesmaids reunion yet? Rose Byrne looked fabulous as we’ve mentioned, Ellie Kemper also perfect, Kristen Wiig was OK. Maya looked like she always does (I love her but I’ve never liked what she wears) but Melissa McCarthy looked godawful.

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.

+1. So many people looking positively skeletal.

I’m more weirded out by the plastic surgery faces. At some point, looking 20 years younger than your real age isn’t impressive. It’s just weird looking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also beautiful and interesting without being weird: Kate Hudson

I love the color and the fabric/beadwork, but dislike the neckline and stiff peplum. It just doesn't move with her at all and she looked like a paper doll in it.

It was actually somewhat reminiscent of a paler, floppier peplum dress that Emma Stone wore a couple years ago (when she won). I didn't like that one either!

Still, great color. Wish it was a more straightforward sheet with maybe a sweetheart or cutaway neckline.

Anonymous wrote:Also beautiful and interesting without being weird: Kate Hudson