Anonymous wrote:I love the lady who checks in officials and swimmers. She is so friendly and we always have a conversation once things slow down (usually in between kid check in and officials being permitted inside).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:faster cut times and smaller overall numbers would help as would eliminating bonus events and cutting down the number of finalists
I think slightly faster qualifying times to around 15-16 A times would help. But I don't like eliminating the bonus events for the 50Y/100Y events as that gives swimmers that only qualify for a few events some other events to swim after they swim their primary events. This is the lowest level championship meet and a lot of these swimmers need the experience swimming in these type of meets.
I think PVS (and PAC) did a great job running the meet overall. My only complaints were:
1. Not letting parents into seating "until enough timers volunteered" was annoying, especially when the officials were volunteering.
2. Clubs not swimming more relays. Relays are fun and the swimmers mostly get excited. But I think this is where PVS has a problem where we don't see the club vs club completion when 50% of the meet are two clubs. I don't know what PVS can do to promote this more, but it could change the atmosphere.
3. Not playing louder music during the events. I think this can energize the crowd and make it feel bigger. It's hard to pull off running two pools at once and requires some seriously skilled announcers. I've been to another LSC championship meets where they played "Call Me Maybe" and the officials could not start the heat because after they stopped playing the music 90% of the swimmers were still screaming the lyrics.
4. Asking volunteers to pay for sessions they were not working. I volunteered for most of the sessions, but still had to pay for the one session where I couldn't volunteer. If you work 3+ sessions, you shouldn't have to pay for other ones.
5. The UMD staff checking in swimmers were kind of rude and giving the kids who didn't show their bag tags a hard time getting in.
I wasn’t even there and I know exactly who you are talking about. That person is notoriously nasty- both to the swimmers and to the volunteers.
Anonymous wrote:Obviously they have to pay for the facility so an easy way to do that is to have more swimmers paying to attend.
And UMd definitely staffs the doors and so on with no nonsense people. You can't put pushovers in those roles.
Well run meet overall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:faster cut times and smaller overall numbers would help as would eliminating bonus events and cutting down the number of finalists
I think slightly faster qualifying times to around 15-16 A times would help. But I don't like eliminating the bonus events for the 50Y/100Y events as that gives swimmers that only qualify for a few events some other events to swim after they swim their primary events. This is the lowest level championship meet and a lot of these swimmers need the experience swimming in these type of meets.
I think PVS (and PAC) did a great job running the meet overall. My only complaints were:
1. Not letting parents into seating "until enough timers volunteered" was annoying, especially when the officials were volunteering.
2. Clubs not swimming more relays. Relays are fun and the swimmers mostly get excited. But I think this is where PVS has a problem where we don't see the club vs club completion when 50% of the meet are two clubs. I don't know what PVS can do to promote this more, but it could change the atmosphere.
3. Not playing louder music during the events. I think this can energize the crowd and make it feel bigger. It's hard to pull off running two pools at once and requires some seriously skilled announcers. I've been to another LSC championship meets where they played "Call Me Maybe" and the officials could not start the heat because after they stopped playing the music 90% of the swimmers were still screaming the lyrics.
4. Asking volunteers to pay for sessions they were not working. I volunteered for most of the sessions, but still had to pay for the one session where I couldn't volunteer. If you work 3+ sessions, you shouldn't have to pay for other ones.
5. The UMD staff checking in swimmers were kind of rude and giving the kids who didn't show their bag tags a hard time getting in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:faster cut times and smaller overall numbers would help as would eliminating bonus events and cutting down the number of finalists
I think slightly faster qualifying times to around 15-16 A times would help. But I don't like eliminating the bonus events for the 50Y/100Y events as that gives swimmers that only qualify for a few events some other events to swim after they swim their primary events. This is the lowest level championship meet and a lot of these swimmers need the experience swimming in these type of meets.
I think PVS (and PAC) did a great job running the meet overall. My only complaints were:
1. Not letting parents into seating "until enough timers volunteered" was annoying, especially when the officials were volunteering.
2. Clubs not swimming more relays. Relays are fun and the swimmers mostly get excited. But I think this is where PVS has a problem where we don't see the club vs club completion when 50% of the meet are two clubs. I don't know what PVS can do to promote this more, but it could change the atmosphere.
3. Not playing louder music during the events. I think this can energize the crowd and make it feel bigger. It's hard to pull off running two pools at once and requires some seriously skilled announcers. I've been to another LSC championship meets where they played "Call Me Maybe" and the officials could not start the heat because after they stopped playing the music 90% of the swimmers were still screaming the lyrics.
4. Asking volunteers to pay for sessions they were not working. I volunteered for most of the sessions, but still had to pay for the one session where I couldn't volunteer. If you work 3+ sessions, you shouldn't have to pay for other ones.
5. The UMD staff checking in swimmers were kind of rude and giving the kids who didn't show their bag tags a hard time getting in.
Anonymous wrote:The starter on the mens side on Saturday morning was terrible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:faster cut times and smaller overall numbers would help as would eliminating bonus events and cutting down the number of finalists
I think slightly faster qualifying times to around 15-16 A times would help. But I don't like eliminating the bonus events for the 50Y/100Y events as that gives swimmers that only qualify for a few events some other events to swim after they swim their primary events. This is the lowest level championship meet and a lot of these swimmers need the experience swimming in these type of meets.
I think PVS (and PAC) did a great job running the meet overall. My only complaints were:
1. Not letting parents into seating "until enough timers volunteered" was annoying, especially when the officials were volunteering.
2. Clubs not swimming more relays. Relays are fun and the swimmers mostly get excited. But I think this is where PVS has a problem where we don't see the club vs club completion when 50% of the meet are two clubs. I don't know what PVS can do to promote this more, but it could change the atmosphere.
3. Not playing louder music during the events. I think this can energize the crowd and make it feel bigger. It's hard to pull off running two pools at once and requires some seriously skilled announcers. I've been to another LSC championship meets where they played "Call Me Maybe" and the officials could not start the heat because after they stopped playing the music 90% of the swimmers were still screaming the lyrics.
4. Asking volunteers to pay for sessions they were not working. I volunteered for most of the sessions, but still had to pay for the one session where I couldn't volunteer. If you work 3+ sessions, you shouldn't have to pay for other ones.
5. The UMD staff checking in swimmers were kind of rude and giving the kids who didn't show their bag tags a hard time getting in.
Anonymous wrote:faster cut times and smaller overall numbers would help as would eliminating bonus events and cutting down the number of finalists
Anonymous wrote:Also if you hated this meet, boy do I have bad news about what the long course version is gonna look like.