Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Understand the role of institutional priorities and how few slots outside of that actually remain in regular decision. Lots of old links on here.
If you are early in the process, think about how you can hit a double or trifecta with some of these priorities: (legacy/donor/undersubscribed major/geo diversity/demo diversity/qualities to directly match new university programming/centers)
Here's info on institutional priorities:
https://ingeniusprep.com/blog/athlete-legacy-admissions-advantage/
A Simplified Example: How a Class of 100 Might Be Allocated
Priority Category Approximate % of Seats
Recruited Athletes 10%
Legacy / Donor / Faculty Kids 12–15%
Full-Pay International 10%
First-Gen / Low-Income 10–15%
Underrepresented Majors 10%
Mission-Aligned Profiles 10%
Academic Standouts 25–30%
I do think one of the reasons my kid got into a T10 RD (legacy) last cycle was because DC hit 4 IPs (donor; legacy; underrepresented major; mission-aligned priorities).
Don’t quite understand the international full-pay bit when there’re plenty of domestic full-pay parents?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people are conflating different tiers of schools here. There is a difference between admission to a T10 and admission to a T30. I don’t think people have been saying you need to be something beyond average excellent to get into schools like Michigan, USC or Rice. And others, like Emory, take more than 30 percent of their ED1 applicants
Emory
USC
Michigan
All attainable for average excellent. Always have been. Just tailor all of those applications and spend weeks on every single one. Do not rush a thing.
And UVA. My average excellent kid got into Michigan and UVA early action. But they are OOS for both so might be different for instate kids?
Our non-DMV private sees a lot of UVA rejects who get into one of HYPSM.
It’s weird.
Mine, out of state, public school, rejected from UVa, but in at HYPSM. I'm curious what it was that led to rejection. His application was pretty strong.
What was his weighted GPA and SAT score? Uva is big on weighted Gpa.
We should have applied to a HYPSM but didn’t.
Our school doesn't weight, but I think around a 4.3 weighted. 3.98 UW. Is that too low for UVa? 35 ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people are conflating different tiers of schools here. There is a difference between admission to a T10 and admission to a T30. I don’t think people have been saying you need to be something beyond average excellent to get into schools like Michigan, USC or Rice. And others, like Emory, take more than 30 percent of their ED1 applicants
Emory
USC
Michigan
All attainable for average excellent. Always have been. Just tailor all of those applications and spend weeks on every single one. Do not rush a thing.
And UVA. My average excellent kid got into Michigan and UVA early action. But they are OOS for both so might be different for instate kids?
Our non-DMV private sees a lot of UVA rejects who get into one of HYPSM.
It’s weird.
Mine, out of state, public school, rejected from UVa, but in at HYPSM. I'm curious what it was that led to rejection. His application was pretty strong.
What was his weighted GPA and SAT score? Uva is big on weighted Gpa.
We should have applied to a HYPSM but didn’t.
Our school doesn't weight, but I think around a 4.3 weighted. 3.98 UW. Is that too low for UVa? 35 ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people are conflating different tiers of schools here. There is a difference between admission to a T10 and admission to a T30. I don’t think people have been saying you need to be something beyond average excellent to get into schools like Michigan, USC or Rice. And others, like Emory, take more than 30 percent of their ED1 applicants
Emory
USC
Michigan
All attainable for average excellent. Always have been. Just tailor all of those applications and spend weeks on every single one. Do not rush a thing.
And UVA. My average excellent kid got into Michigan and UVA early action. But they are OOS for both so might be different for instate kids?
Our non-DMV private sees a lot of UVA rejects who get into one of HYPSM.
It’s weird.
Mine, out of state, public school, rejected from UVa, but in at HYPSM. I'm curious what it was that led to rejection. His application was pretty strong.
What was his weighted GPA and SAT score? Uva is big on weighted Gpa.
We should have applied to a HYPSM but didn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people are conflating different tiers of schools here. There is a difference between admission to a T10 and admission to a T30. I don’t think people have been saying you need to be something beyond average excellent to get into schools like Michigan, USC or Rice. And others, like Emory, take more than 30 percent of their ED1 applicants
Emory
USC
Michigan
All attainable for average excellent. Always have been. Just tailor all of those applications and spend weeks on every single one. Do not rush a thing.
And UVA. My average excellent kid got into Michigan and UVA early action. But they are OOS for both so might be different for instate kids?
Our non-DMV private sees a lot of UVA rejects who get into one of HYPSM.
It’s weird.
Mine, out of state, public school, rejected from UVa, but in at HYPSM. I'm curious what it was that led to rejection. His application was pretty strong.
Anonymous wrote:Sports recruiting is the wild, Wild West. Don’t have a number one pick but have a list of 5 that your kid could see themselves at. Don’t be afraid to play the school offers against each other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO Michigan acceptance EA is the bellwether of a competitive RD app process, provided not STEM or CS.
Does this also hold true for the USC EA acceptance?
USC EA is quite random. Some kids who were admitted got in nowhere better, and others had USC at the bottom of their choices after Ivy Day.
I don’t think it’s random at all. They like smart well-packaged kids who have a little gloss and a connection to USC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people are conflating different tiers of schools here. There is a difference between admission to a T10 and admission to a T30. I don’t think people have been saying you need to be something beyond average excellent to get into schools like Michigan, USC or Rice. And others, like Emory, take more than 30 percent of their ED1 applicants
Nope, not conflating anything. (And honestly you’re slicing the baloney pretty thin with this “T10 is different” thing.)
Our HS sends average-excellent kids to Ivies, Northwestern, Hopkins pretty much every year.
Well, others are because I see mention of a lot of schools that aren’t T10 in suppprt of this point. Further a few Ivies aren’t top 10 either, so you probably are as well.
I’m talking about Northwestern, Hopkins, Yale, Brown, Penn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people are conflating different tiers of schools here. There is a difference between admission to a T10 and admission to a T30. I don’t think people have been saying you need to be something beyond average excellent to get into schools like Michigan, USC or Rice. And others, like Emory, take more than 30 percent of their ED1 applicants
Nope, not conflating anything. (And honestly you’re slicing the baloney pretty thin with this “T10 is different” thing.)
Our HS sends average-excellent kids to Ivies, Northwestern, Hopkins pretty much every year.
Well, others are because I see mention of a lot of schools that aren’t T10 in suppprt of this point. Further a few Ivies aren’t top 10 either, so you probably are as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO Michigan acceptance EA is the bellwether of a competitive RD app process, provided not STEM or CS.
Does this also hold true for the USC EA acceptance?
USC EA is quite random. Some kids who were admitted got in nowhere better, and others had USC at the bottom of their choices after Ivy Day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO Michigan acceptance EA is the bellwether of a competitive RD app process, provided not STEM or CS.
What if you don't apply to Michigan EA?
Also I heard this year they botched things given they try ED for first time and many deferrals in EA have not even been read yet.
Where did you hear referrals in EA have not been read yet?
NP, but my DC's school (private feeder non-DMV) college counseling office told us the same. We suspect that they pushed aside the EA applications from top privates to be read later and deferred them; they know that if Michigan was your #1, you ED'd, and the EA kids wouldn't commit if admitted in January and will only yield if RD goes poorly for them. There's no harm for them in deferring the top private kids.
No one on this board would be doing anything besides making things up if they tried to answer this.
Is it possible they didn't ready my DD's file in engineering but they read a classmates file in Biology (school or arts & sciences)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO Michigan acceptance EA is the bellwether of a competitive RD app process, provided not STEM or CS.
Does this also hold true for the USC EA acceptance?
USC EA is quite random. Some kids who were admitted got in nowhere better, and others had USC at the bottom of their choices after Ivy Day.