Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
I’d say more like 70%.
Wow. Really? Why do you send your kids to a school that does that? What’s wrong with you?
All the peer DMV private schools are the same so what are my options?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
You should actively tell your school this. Be the loudest voice in the room. Yell at someone in the FA office. Present all of this with apparently zero evidence. Accuse the administration of corruption.
You might be asked to leave the school, but you will have done a great service to…something.
Put down the wine.
The rebuttal of a person who has no rebuttal and knows their views are out of line with the norm.
The lack of transparency and accountability is what leads to waste, fraud, and abuse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The HHI limit for FA is quite simply whatever the school wants it to be.
This isn't some Government program with a bunch of rigid guidelines. No one is overseeing the distribution of the funds to ensure that things are "fair".
They consider the applications and then distribute the money and "relative need" is just part of what they consider.
As a result, you have situations where families with high incomes get FA and those with lower ones do not. And they certainly get more than the families that don't apply.
Schools aren't immune to pleas from high earners based on special circumstances. Especially if they have some available money left in the FA budget.
Then there is the matter of "ethics". Today's WSJ has an article describing how large numbers are claiming they are disabled so they can get priority boarding and seating. They board the plane in wheelchairs and at the destination they walk off apparently being miraculously cured during the flight.
Many of us would never consider doing something like this. But there are many who see this as OK behavior. IMO we have more than a few people like this in the DMV.
The majority of disabled people who use a wheelchair in daily life can also walk a little. They use a chair when they're feeling poorly or have to walk a long distance or need to save energy.
Being able to walk a little doesn't mean they don't truly need a wheelchair. But these people face continued harassment from busybodies who think you should only use a wheelchair or services (or handicap parking) if you are entirely wheelchair bound. Those busybodies are the same as the people claiming you should only get FA if you are destitute.
+1. The rank ignorance of the judgmental people in these cases is the same.
No there is a WSJ article about the trend of people faking disability for airline benefits. You are the ignorant one for judging them without due diligence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
I’d say more like 70%.
Wow. Really? Why do you send your kids to a school that does that? What’s wrong with you?
All the peer DMV private schools are the same so what are my options?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
I’d say more like 70%.
Wow. Really? Why do you send your kids to a school that does that? What’s wrong with you?
+1. Imagine caring so little about your kids that you continue to send them to an institution that is riddled with massive fraud and corruption.
You are describing all the DMV privates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The HHI limit for FA is quite simply whatever the school wants it to be.
This isn't some Government program with a bunch of rigid guidelines. No one is overseeing the distribution of the funds to ensure that things are "fair".
They consider the applications and then distribute the money and "relative need" is just part of what they consider.
As a result, you have situations where families with high incomes get FA and those with lower ones do not. And they certainly get more than the families that don't apply.
Schools aren't immune to pleas from high earners based on special circumstances. Especially if they have some available money left in the FA budget.
Then there is the matter of "ethics". Today's WSJ has an article describing how large numbers are claiming they are disabled so they can get priority boarding and seating. They board the plane in wheelchairs and at the destination they walk off apparently being miraculously cured during the flight.
Many of us would never consider doing something like this. But there are many who see this as OK behavior. IMO we have more than a few people like this in the DMV.
The majority of disabled people who use a wheelchair in daily life can also walk a little. They use a chair when they're feeling poorly or have to walk a long distance or need to save energy.
Being able to walk a little doesn't mean they don't truly need a wheelchair. But these people face continued harassment from busybodies who think you should only use a wheelchair or services (or handicap parking) if you are entirely wheelchair bound. Those busybodies are the same as the people claiming you should only get FA if you are destitute.
+1. The rank ignorance of the judgmental people in these cases is the same.
No there is a WSJ article about the trend of people faking disability for airline benefits. You are the ignorant one for judging them without due diligence.
NP. You sound like a real peach.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
I’d say more like 70%.
Wow. Really? Why do you send your kids to a school that does that? What’s wrong with you?
+1. Imagine caring so little about your kids that you continue to send them to an institution that is riddled with massive fraud and corruption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The HHI limit for FA is quite simply whatever the school wants it to be.
This isn't some Government program with a bunch of rigid guidelines. No one is overseeing the distribution of the funds to ensure that things are "fair".
They consider the applications and then distribute the money and "relative need" is just part of what they consider.
As a result, you have situations where families with high incomes get FA and those with lower ones do not. And they certainly get more than the families that don't apply.
Schools aren't immune to pleas from high earners based on special circumstances. Especially if they have some available money left in the FA budget.
Then there is the matter of "ethics". Today's WSJ has an article describing how large numbers are claiming they are disabled so they can get priority boarding and seating. They board the plane in wheelchairs and at the destination they walk off apparently being miraculously cured during the flight.
Many of us would never consider doing something like this. But there are many who see this as OK behavior. IMO we have more than a few people like this in the DMV.
The majority of disabled people who use a wheelchair in daily life can also walk a little. They use a chair when they're feeling poorly or have to walk a long distance or need to save energy.
Being able to walk a little doesn't mean they don't truly need a wheelchair. But these people face continued harassment from busybodies who think you should only use a wheelchair or services (or handicap parking) if you are entirely wheelchair bound. Those busybodies are the same as the people claiming you should only get FA if you are destitute.
+1. The rank ignorance of the judgmental people in these cases is the same.
No there is a WSJ article about the trend of people faking disability for airline benefits. You are the ignorant one for judging them without due diligence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
I’d say more like 70%.
Wow. Really? Why do you send your kids to a school that does that? What’s wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The HHI limit for FA is quite simply whatever the school wants it to be.
This isn't some Government program with a bunch of rigid guidelines. No one is overseeing the distribution of the funds to ensure that things are "fair".
They consider the applications and then distribute the money and "relative need" is just part of what they consider.
As a result, you have situations where families with high incomes get FA and those with lower ones do not. And they certainly get more than the families that don't apply.
Schools aren't immune to pleas from high earners based on special circumstances. Especially if they have some available money left in the FA budget.
Then there is the matter of "ethics". Today's WSJ has an article describing how large numbers are claiming they are disabled so they can get priority boarding and seating. They board the plane in wheelchairs and at the destination they walk off apparently being miraculously cured during the flight.
Many of us would never consider doing something like this. But there are many who see this as OK behavior. IMO we have more than a few people like this in the DMV.
The majority of disabled people who use a wheelchair in daily life can also walk a little. They use a chair when they're feeling poorly or have to walk a long distance or need to save energy.
Being able to walk a little doesn't mean they don't truly need a wheelchair. But these people face continued harassment from busybodies who think you should only use a wheelchair or services (or handicap parking) if you are entirely wheelchair bound. Those busybodies are the same as the people claiming you should only get FA if you are destitute.
+1. The rank ignorance of the judgmental people in these cases is the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The HHI limit for FA is quite simply whatever the school wants it to be.
This isn't some Government program with a bunch of rigid guidelines. No one is overseeing the distribution of the funds to ensure that things are "fair".
They consider the applications and then distribute the money and "relative need" is just part of what they consider.
As a result, you have situations where families with high incomes get FA and those with lower ones do not. And they certainly get more than the families that don't apply.
Schools aren't immune to pleas from high earners based on special circumstances. Especially if they have some available money left in the FA budget.
Then there is the matter of "ethics". Today's WSJ has an article describing how large numbers are claiming they are disabled so they can get priority boarding and seating. They board the plane in wheelchairs and at the destination they walk off apparently being miraculously cured during the flight.
Many of us would never consider doing something like this. But there are many who see this as OK behavior. IMO we have more than a few people like this in the DMV.
The majority of disabled people who use a wheelchair in daily life can also walk a little. They use a chair when they're feeling poorly or have to walk a long distance or need to save energy.
Being able to walk a little doesn't mean they don't truly need a wheelchair. But these people face continued harassment from busybodies who think you should only use a wheelchair or services (or handicap parking) if you are entirely wheelchair bound. Those busybodies are the same as the people claiming you should only get FA if you are destitute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
I’d say more like 70%.
Wow. Really? Why do you send your kids to a school that does that? What’s wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Taking home 200k a year is not rich by DC standards. Obviously it's not poverty, but also not enough to afford a home within an hour's commute, living expenses and $100K in tuition (for 2 kids).
What some people don't get, and most schools understand, is that a community of only the super rich and super poor is not socioeconomic diversity. It benefits everyone to include perspectives and contributions from kids whose parents are federal employees, small business owners and teachers.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.
I’d say more like 70%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The FA budget at most schools could be cut in half with no real impact on the families who actually need it.
Estimating that waste, fraud, and abuse is approximately 50% of the FA budget.