Anonymous wrote:What if you work in management for tech and make 200k+ annually but you will also inherit 12 million down the line.
UC or UMC?
Anonymous wrote:We all long to be Brits with a bloodline class system but the best we can muster is multigenerational inherited wealth and private schools to reinforce manners learned at home.
Anonymous wrote:Once again, lots of people are conflating class with money, which itself is a very middle class way of looking at things.
UMC has a home theater; UC has a (live) theater subscription.
UMC has a power boat; UC has a sailboat.
UMC is terribly concerned with meeting the right people; UC already knows them. (Whether they like them is a whole 'nother matter.)
UMC has a freshly paved and sealed driveway. UC has washboarded gravel.
UMC children are William (never Will or Billy) and Charlotte (never Lottie or Char). UC children are Bungy, Lala, Chip/Trey/Quinn, and Roo.
UMC fly on A plane. UC fly on THE plane.
UMC kids learn golf from the club pro. UC kids learn from their parents and grandparents.
UMC horse-crazy daughters buy $1200 boots for horse shows. UC daughters go fox hunting in their mom's old tweeds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on these responses you can be upper class while earning $100k in investments, sitting on a not for profit board and living extremely modestly. But upper middle while earning $1 million.
I distinguish between the wealthy and rich - rich is making $1M or $5M or whatever but you need to work to maintain your lifestyle. Wealthy is never working a day again and you can even increase your lifestyle via assets that work for you. Obviously the goal is to graduate from rich > wealthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Upper middle class earn a nice income $250k+ from working.
Upper class have typical annual investment returns of $300k+ and they likely work additionally.
Im in the second category, even though we have vacationed in Hawaii (no condo) and our cleaning lady comes only biweekly.
Is 300k in investments and an office job really upper class nowadays?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Upper Class: This is the realm of traditional blue-blooded elites who, although they lack the almost mythical wealth of their higher counterparts, still wield considerable influence. Think of families like the Kennedys and Roosevelts — families who, according to Fussell, are obviously extremely elite but too “public” to be placed in the higher “top out of sight” tier.
Upper Middle Class: This class represents the backbone of educated professionals who, while not possessing the lineage or heritage wealth of the ‘Upper Class’, nonetheless hold significant sway within society. If the ‘Upper Class’ is defined by heritage and wealth, then the ‘Upper Middle Class’ is defined by education. Here, you’ll find a plethora of Ivy League degrees and advanced qualifications. Universities are seen not merely as gateways to professional success but as indispensable institutions for cultural enlightenment and social bonding. As for professions, expect a broad spectrum. They’re your accomplished lawyers, seasoned doctors, university professors, and successful small business owners. Their careers offer more than economic comfort — they command societal respect and intellectual satisfaction. Culturally, the ‘Upper Middle Class’ champions meritocracy and the pursuit of personal growth. They place a high premium on cultural literacy, aesthetic refinement, and intellectual curiosity. In essence, the ‘Upper Middle Class’ values are rooted in achievement through dedication and education rather than inherited status. They are the embodiment of the American dream, where one can rise through the ranks via hard work and intellectual acumen.
Note class is what you're born into, not the money you have. A blue collar plumber who wins the lottery or happens to sell his business for $20 million is still High Proletarian. Now, his kids might level up. That is, no matter how much sheen you put on it, you will find your class markers betraying you even if you become successful and wealthy. For instance, I know some very wealthy and successful people who grew up poor and their very nice and tasteful house is packed with food. Like ridiculous and wasteful amounts of food -- because it's a sign of comfort and of the trauma due to food insecurity that they experienced as children. That's a sure sign that they were born lower middle class or lower.
Most of this sounds straight out of chatgpt, with all the attendant lack of understanding.
Oh please enlighten us on what is misunderstood. This was pulled from notes from Paul Fussell's book, "Class" along with personal anecdotes and recognizing it's a wonderful, albeit dated guide to class distinctions in America. Or perhaps I struck a nerve because it hit too close to home? If it did, then it's probably because you're decidedly middle class and insecure.
Lady white people are about to be a minority in America. The days of the illustrious blue bloods are dated. Dying breed, to be frank. Too many generations now and too much dilution.
Nice that you think that but you are wrong. There will always be UC WASP culture. There is already UC Hispanic culture. The future will mean that there will also be UC American Asian, Persian, Nigerian, etc. People bring their culture with them and adapt it.
No Black UC culture??
Anonymous wrote:LOL. I’m pp and reading the thread. I guess I’m not the only one thinking the math ain’t mathin’.
Anonymous wrote:Most people on DCUM are most likely UMC