Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

1. Nice try. The Salant program at JHU is an investment banking team/club. The fact that Goldman meets with them and not the econ program means the school has poor placement, similar to an IU Kelley. If JHU had good placement, one wouldn't even need to major in econ like this girl at Emory, a bio major.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-cao-768691204/

2. "Emory sucks" isn't a fact, dufus. All 100 of those waitlisted students didn't enroll. And you're pivoting —stay on topic: we're talking about finance placement.

3. Here's JP Morgan on campus recruitment for Emory
https://cpd.emory.edu/events/2025/11/12/j-p-morgan-mid-cap-investment-banking-information-session/

4. Lastly, JHU's MBA program is unranked by Bloomberg and US News. Emory is 16 and 17, respectively.

Nice try focusing on jhu as the example, but like the other top 10s, it dwarfs emory in selectivity, academic prowess (ranking across academic departments) and desirability. The point is, jhu has a small econ program and placement should be compared on a per capita relative to applicants. info you don't have. If a school places 300 kids, but 1500 apply to IB vs one that places 30 where 40 apply, which is actually more impressive?

Info you do the have yet here you are making up random statistical scenarios. And JHU ( and Caltech) was always the example. You're IQ is low.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

1. Nice try. The Salant program at JHU is an investment banking team/club. The fact that Goldman meets with them and not the econ program means the school has poor placement, similar to an IU Kelley. If JHU had good placement, one wouldn't even need to major in econ like this girl at Emory, a bio major.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-cao-768691204/

2. "Emory sucks" isn't a fact, dufus. All 100 of those waitlisted students didn't enroll. And you're pivoting —stay on topic: we're talking about finance placement.

3. Here's JP Morgan on campus recruitment for Emory
https://cpd.emory.edu/events/2025/11/12/j-p-morgan-mid-cap-investment-banking-information-session/

4. Lastly, JHU's MBA program is unranked by Bloomberg and US News. Emory is 16 and 17, respectively.

Pp, dp will move the goal post and say Goldman is better than JPM. They'll find a way on dcum.

The comedy. You say emory sucks isn't a fact then say the 100 waitlisted students accepted didn't enroll. Yea, I wouldn't either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

1. Nice try. The Salant program at JHU is an investment banking team/club. The fact that Goldman meets with them and not the econ program means the school has poor placement, similar to an IU Kelley. If JHU had good placement, one wouldn't even need to major in econ like this girl at Emory, a bio major.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-cao-768691204/

2. "Emory sucks" isn't a fact, dufus. All 100 of those waitlisted students didn't enroll. And you're pivoting —stay on topic: we're talking about finance placement.

3. Here's JP Morgan on campus recruitment for Emory
https://cpd.emory.edu/events/2025/11/12/j-p-morgan-mid-cap-investment-banking-information-session/

4. Lastly, JHU's MBA program is unranked by Bloomberg and US News. Emory is 16 and 17, respectively.

Nice try focusing on jhu as the example, but like the other top 10s, it dwarfs emory in selectivity, academic prowess (ranking across academic departments) and desirability. The point is, jhu has a small econ program and placement should be compared on a per capita relative to applicants. info you don't have. If a school places 300 kids, but 1500 apply to IB vs one that places 30 where 40 apply, which is actually more impressive?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

The point is even Top 10s aren't all around schools.

In the strictest sense, you are right. Yale is not strong in Computer Science/Engineering.
The point is T10 has strong brand. The point stands.
Outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. This point also stands.

If all Top 10 had strong enough brands, placement at placed like JHU wouldn't be weak in one area like Finance. Although Yale is weaker in CS, it still has good placement. JHU doesn't fit that mold, and would still take Emory over it for finance.

I see. lol

How about swap Emory with JHU for T10? Would that make you happy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

1. Nice try. The Salant program at JHU is an investment banking team/club. The fact that Goldman meets with them and not the econ program means the school has poor placement, similar to an IU Kelley. If JHU had good placement, one wouldn't even need to major in econ like this girl at Emory, a bio major.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-cao-768691204/

2. "Emory sucks" isn't a fact, dufus. All 100 of those waitlisted students didn't enroll. And you're pivoting —stay on topic: we're talking about finance placement.

3. Here's JP Morgan on campus recruitment for Emory
https://cpd.emory.edu/events/2025/11/12/j-p-morgan-mid-cap-investment-banking-information-session/

4. Lastly, JHU's MBA program is unranked by Bloomberg and US News. Emory is 16 and 17, respectively.

Pp, dp will move the goal post and say Goldman is better than JPM. They'll find a way on dcum.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

The point is even Top 10s aren't all around schools.

In the strictest sense, you are right. Yale is not strong in Computer Science/Engineering.
The point is T10 has strong brand. The point stands.
Outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. This point also stands.

If all Top 10 had strong enough brands, placement at placed like JHU wouldn't be weak in one area like Finance. Although Yale is weaker in CS, it still has good placement. JHU doesn't fit that mold, and would still take Emory over it for finance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

The point is even Top 10s aren't all around schools.

In the strictest sense, you are right. Yale is not strong in Computer Science/Engineering.
The point is T10 has strong brand. The point stands.
Outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. This point also stands.

If all Top 10 had strong enough brands, placement at placed like JHU wouldn't be weak in one area like Finance. Although Yale is weaker in CS, it still has good placement. JHU doesn't fit that mold, and would still take Emory over it for finance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

1. Nice try. The Salant program at JHU is an investment banking team/club. The fact that Goldman meets with them and not the econ program means the school has poor placement, similar to an IU Kelley. If JHU had good placement, one wouldn't even need to major in econ like this girl at Emory, a bio major.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-cao-768691204/

2. "Emory sucks" isn't a fact, dufus. All 100 of those waitlisted students didn't enroll. And you're pivoting —stay on topic: we're talking about finance placement.

3. Here's JP Morgan on campus recruitment for Emory
https://cpd.emory.edu/events/2025/11/12/j-p-morgan-mid-cap-investment-banking-information-session/

4. Lastly, JHU's MBA program is unranked by Bloomberg and US News. Emory is 16 and 17, respectively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

The point is even Top 10s aren't all around schools.

In the strictest sense, you are right. Yale is not strong in Computer Science/Engineering.
The point is T10 has strong brand. The point stands.
Outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. This point also stands.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

The point is even Top 10s aren't all around schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

1. Nice try. The Salant program at JHU is an investment banking team/club. The fact that Goldman meets with them and not the econ program means the school has poor placement, similar to an IU Kelley. If JHU had good placement, one wouldn't even need to major in econ like this girl at Emory, a bio major.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-cao-768691204/

2. "Emory sucks" isn't a fact, dufus. All 100 of those waitlisted students didn't enroll. And you're pivoting —stay on topic: we're talking about finance placement.

3. Here's JP Morgan on campus recruitment for Emory
https://cpd.emory.edu/events/2025/11/12/j-p-morgan-mid-cap-investment-banking-information-session/

4. Lastly, JHU's MBA program is unranked by Bloomberg and US News. Emory is 16 and 17, respectively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, I suspect a Caltech graduate would not have any problem landing a quant job. Just none would be even remotely interested in doing that.

quant jobs are hard even for caltech grads

Oh god, something I actually know about. No, quant jobs are not hard for Caltech grads. I take it you don't recruit for, and probably couldn't name, the top 10 quant firms.

Only 10 Caltech grads at Jane Street according to linkedin, only 5 at optiver. Emory has 6 at Jane Street.

This means nothing Most of the emory (5 of 6 are back office roles like legal or accounting project manager not quants).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, I suspect a Caltech graduate would not have any problem landing a quant job. Just none would be even remotely interested in doing that.

quant jobs are hard even for caltech grads

Oh god, something I actually know about. No, quant jobs are not hard for Caltech grads. I take it you don't recruit for, and probably couldn't name, the top 10 quant firms.

Only 10 Caltech grads at Jane Street according to linkedin, only 5 at optiver. Emory has 6 at Jane Street.