Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think having the ties makes sense in some ways because those who think there is truly a lot of difference between 14 and 15 are morons. Is there a difference between 2 and 29? Probably. Between schools that are one or two notches apart. No.
2 and the 13s already are very different.
No
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think having the ties makes sense in some ways because those who think there is truly a lot of difference between 14 and 15 are morons. Is there a difference between 2 and 29? Probably. Between schools that are one or two notches apart. No.
2 and the 13s already are very different.
Anonymous wrote:Pomona is slipping on every ranking. CMC is the new number 1 in the Claremont system
Anonymous wrote:Williams = little Yale
Amherst = little Princeton
Swarthmore = little U Chicago
Bowdoin = little Dartmouth
Pomona = little Brown
Wellesley = Wellesley, no cheap imitation:
"I am inimitable; I am an original. I'm not falling behind or running late. I'm not standing still: I am lying in wait.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oberlin is what makes me not put much stock in USNWR's rankings. Their endowment is 1.27B. Compared to the schools listed alongside them at #58- Gettysburg's is $314M, St. Lawrence's is $378M. Oberlin has had 4 Nobel laureates and has a world-renowned conservatory. I was hoping they would pop back up into the top 50, but to bump them even further down the list is ridiculous. You're just not going to convince me that my kid will get a better education at Berea College in Kentucky or Soka University (a dang cult) than at Oberlin.
I agree that Oberlin should be much higher, Really great phd placements, especially in sciences.
It’s surprising how little us news puts into the diversity of liberal arts colleges. Oberlin is super unique in having a conservatory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oberlin is what makes me not put much stock in USNWR's rankings. Their endowment is 1.27B. Compared to the schools listed alongside them at #58- Gettysburg's is $314M, St. Lawrence's is $378M. Oberlin has had 4 Nobel laureates and has a world-renowned conservatory. I was hoping they would pop back up into the top 50, but to bump them even further down the list is ridiculous. You're just not going to convince me that my kid will get a better education at Berea College in Kentucky or Soka University (a dang cult) than at Oberlin.
I agree that Oberlin should be much higher, Really great phd placements, especially in sciences.
Anonymous wrote:Oberlin is what makes me not put much stock in USNWR's rankings. Their endowment is 1.27B. Compared to the schools listed alongside them at #58- Gettysburg's is $314M, St. Lawrence's is $378M. Oberlin has had 4 Nobel laureates and has a world-renowned conservatory. I was hoping they would pop back up into the top 50, but to bump them even further down the list is ridiculous. You're just not going to convince me that my kid will get a better education at Berea College in Kentucky or Soka University (a dang cult) than at Oberlin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Carleton professors ranked best in the nation for the 15th year in a row! That's got to count for something.
Of course it does. Carleton is just as good as WASP in my view, especially for STEM. DC was torn between Amherst and Carleton, only chose the former because of the difference in financial aid ($20K vs. $0) and location (easy drive/train from DMV plus relatives nearby). Otherwise, not sure what the final choice would have been. Agree with PPs who've stated the differences in quality of UG education are negligible.
Anonymous wrote:Carleton professors ranked best in the nation for the 15th year in a row! That's got to count for something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[i]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^Splitting hairs they clearly do belong.
Not at all, Bowdoin has not consistently been ranked at the top like Williams and Amherst. It has worse student quality and ED2. It’s a good school, just not at the level of AWS
Average USNWR rankings over the last 35 or so years
Williams
Amherst
Swarthmore
Pomona*
Wellesley*
Bowdoin
Middlebury
Carleton
Ranked by size of endowment size
Williams
Amherst
Swarthmore
Pomona*
Wellesley*
Bowdoin
Middlebury
Carleton
Get the correlation? There is no difference among any of these schools except for the size of their bag.
35 or so years? Where is the citation for this? U.S. News rankings have been around far longer than that.
US news ranking is continuously built off of endowment per student for LACs. There's really no tangible reason williams would be number 1 every year for decades.
Anonymous wrote:Carleton professors ranked best in the nation for the 15th year in a row! That's got to count for something.