Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

This is not the royal we

We don’t need to have a stick up our butt simply because the U.S policy is to let uber wealthy not pay their fair share for the resources they get from the country.

There would be no debt

But I know you are not wealthy because you quoted that. That’s the pablum they give plus to explain why we don't get anything while they sacrifice nothing

As of early 2025, the United States is home to 813 billionaires. Their combined wealth was estimated at $6.72 trillion.


In March 2025, the U.S. government debt stood at $36.21 trillion.

So even if we took every dollar from every billionaire in the United States, the national debt would still be over $29 trillion dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

This is not the royal we

We don’t need to have a stick up our butt simply because the U.S policy is to let uber wealthy not pay their fair share for the resources they get from the country.

There would be no debt

But I know you are not wealthy because you quoted that. That’s the pablum they give plus to explain why we don't get anything while they sacrifice nothing

Do we need a new app? US FoodAid One? 24/7/365, a hungry family anywhere in the world can request food assistance from the US taxpayer. We will keep the $23 billion USAID is handing out yearly and in addition provide more food aid.

No child will die of malnutrition or starvation. We will use US tax dollars to make sure every child has food and medical care.

It would certainly be a noble undertaking befitting the role the US once played in this world.

Ok, so when will this food app be implemented? You believe the United States should nobly provide food for every child in the world. How much will it cost?

Do you want the US to provide healthcare to every child in the world? Cost?

I'm not actively building an app. Perhaps check in with your politicians to convey your child death hopes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

But you are willing to pay for Trump to play golf and an entire separate living situation for his "wife".

The US taxpayer always pays for the US president and his family. Why should this administration be different?

Do taxpayers choose what to pay for?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

This is not the royal we

We don’t need to have a stick up our butt simply because the U.S policy is to let uber wealthy not pay their fair share for the resources they get from the country.

There would be no debt

But I know you are not wealthy because you quoted that. That’s the pablum they give plus to explain why we don't get anything while they sacrifice nothing

Do we need a new app? US FoodAid One? 24/7/365, a hungry family anywhere in the world can request food assistance from the US taxpayer. We will keep the $23 billion USAID is handing out yearly and in addition provide more food aid.

No child will die of malnutrition or starvation. We will use US tax dollars to make sure every child has food and medical care.

It would certainly be a noble undertaking befitting the role the US once played in this world.

Ok, so when will this food app be implemented? You believe the United States should nobly provide food for every child in the world. How much will it cost?

Do you want the US to provide healthcare to every child in the world? Cost?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

But you are willing to pay for Trump to play golf and an entire separate living situation for his "wife".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

This is not the royal we

We don’t need to have a stick up our butt simply because the U.S policy is to let uber wealthy not pay their fair share for the resources they get from the country.

There would be no debt

But I know you are not wealthy because you quoted that. That’s the pablum they give plus to explain why we don't get anything while they sacrifice nothing

Do we need a new app? US FoodAid One? 24/7/365, a hungry family anywhere in the world can request food assistance from the US taxpayer. We will keep the $23 billion USAID is handing out yearly and in addition provide more food aid.

No child will die of malnutrition or starvation. We will use US tax dollars to make sure every child has food and medical care.

It would certainly be a noble undertaking befitting the role the US once played in this world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

This is not the royal we

We don’t need to have a stick up our butt simply because the U.S policy is to let uber wealthy not pay their fair share for the resources they get from the country.

There would be no debt

But I know you are not wealthy because you quoted that. That’s the pablum they give plus to explain why we don't get anything while they sacrifice nothing

Do we need a new app? US FoodAid One? 24/7/365, a hungry family anywhere in the world can request food assistance from the US taxpayer. We will keep the $23 billion USAID is handing out yearly and in addition provide more food aid.

No child will die of malnutrition or starvation. We will use US tax dollars to make sure every child has food and medical care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

This is not the royal we

We don’t need to have a stick up our butt simply because the U.S policy is to let uber wealthy not pay their fair share for the resources they get from the country.

There would be no debt

But I know you are not wealthy because you quoted that. That’s the pablum they give plus to explain why we don't get anything while they sacrifice nothing

We dole out $23 billion per year; how much more do democrats want Americans to pay to ensure every child in the world has enough food to survive and adequate medical care to live healthy lives?

Do you have a total dollar amount you can provide the American tax payer, including billionaires?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

With average annual disbursements of about $23 billion since 2001, USAID is still allowing 10,000 children per day globally to die.

Why are we allowing 10,000 per day to die from malnutrition and starvation?

Not being able to save everyone shouldn't be an impediment to doing something as a nation.

I mean that was the great U.S.
Not possible now, too many MAGA. Oh the irony...

So 10,000 children per day worldwide started dying the day Donald Trump took office?

Do you have any reputable sources to support your claim?

Are you claiming that when a democratic president is in office, no children die of malnutrition and starvation?

Do you have any reputable sources to support your claim?

Can you provide data from a reputable site that shows that “MAGA” (can you define what that is? A political slogan isn’t in charge of anything) has caused previously well fed children to starve and die?

Since this is a board of intelligent, well intentioned adults, you will definitely provide the evidence you are basing your post/comment on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

This is not the royal we

We don’t need to have a stick up our butt simply because the U.S policy is to let uber wealthy not pay their fair share for the resources they get from the country.

There would be no debt

But I know you are not wealthy because you quoted that. That’s the pablum they give plus to explain why we don't get anything while they sacrifice nothing

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

With average annual disbursements of about $23 billion since 2001, USAID is still allowing 10,000 children per day globally to die.

Why are we allowing 10,000 per day to die from malnutrition and starvation?

Not being able to save everyone shouldn't be an impediment to doing something as a nation.

I mean that was the great U.S.
Not possible now, too many MAGA. Oh the irony...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

No. For the same reason, this child and her family need to leave; the US is not responsible for feeding, vaccinating, and providing for every needy person and country in the world.

We are in debt to our eyeballs and cannot afford to take any more strays.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sounds like she only needs to go to the hospital every six weeks. Couldn’t she fly in from Mexico?

Also how does Mexico simply not offer this treatment?! So every kid in Mexico with this condition just… dies?!?

It sounds like they do have treatment for short bowel syndrome. But this girl needs a special type of treatment.

Her family prefers this treatment.

This would be a different scenario if the treatment had a foreseeable end. This child needs lifelong care. It shouldn't be US taxpayer responsibility to cover this.

The little girl will receive care as she did before coming to the US.

You are correct; it’s not the care her parents prefer; but also, it’s not a death sentence.

So, there are tens of thousands of children who don’t receive enough food/nutrition each day and die.

Should we not ensure every child in the world receives enough nutrition to live?

The parents of those children want their children to live, too.

Why do we not ensure all children have sufficient nutrition to maintain their lives?

USAID?

Hmm... only there was something...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

With average annual disbursements of about $23 billion since 2001, USAID is still allowing 10,000 children per day globally to die.

Why are we allowing 10,000 per day to die from malnutrition and starvation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10,000 children worldwide starve to death every single day.

Why do we allow that to happen? We have plenty of food.

Why are we letting 10,000 children per day starve to death?

Sounds like we need a federal agency tasked with providing AID around the world. . .maybe it could be called USAID or something clever like that. . .oh. . .wait. . .

You know that the “AID” in USAID did not stand for “aid” right? It’s an acronym.