Anonymous
06/05/2025 09:23
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Let's put this POTY stuff to bed. You all have beaten a dead horse, and neither side looks good anymore. Several kids could make a claim to POTY, but only one can win, and the kid who won is certainly a good enough.
Anonymous
06/05/2025 09:22
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
No you are spot on. I think this is an argument about absolutely nothing because that kid did not and will not get POY.Anonymous wrote:has the Washington Post All Met section even been released yet?
Maybe I missed it
Anonymous
06/05/2025 09:06
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
"not a good look". Not working on the rest of the quotes, or even that one (which says in error the team won POY) as people can read. You sound hurt, and for that I can speak for everyone that makes us sad.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You started out demeaning not just the player, but his entire team. Then you threw in a backhanded thank you for your service so peeps know you're still a good guy despite that and 'merica. You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for validation and a mob. Or what you got, reciprocation and a platform. Now you're crying hard with the victim card.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.
Do I have all this right?
*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!
"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.
You're not real good at this.
And you're worse. Quotes were provided, but I don't see anything from you. I believe almost every single post had something like - "really good player but "
"mob,,,crying,,,victim,,,bactine,,,friends"
Go tell someone to wear a mask. You're right, snark does feel good for a brief moment.
Masks don't really work, but if they make you feel more confortable, go for it.
Anonymous
06/05/2025 08:43
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
I thought The Heights was a christian school? The amount of vitriol spewing from a backer is really up there.
Anonymous
06/05/2025 08:42
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Anonymous wrote:You started out demeaning not just the player, but his entire team. Then you threw in a backhanded thank you for your service so peeps know you're still a good guy despite that and 'merica. You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for validation and a mob. Or what you got, reciprocation and a platform. Now you're crying hard with the victim card.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.
Do I have all this right?
*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!
"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.
You're not real good at this.
And you're worse. Quotes were provided, but I don't see anything from you. I believe almost every single post had something like - "really good player but "
"mob,,,crying,,,victim,,,bactine,,,friends"
Go tell someone to wear a mask. You're right, snark does feel good for a brief moment.
Anonymous
06/05/2025 08:35
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
You started out demeaning not just the player, but his entire team. Then you threw in a backhanded thank you for your service so peeps know you're still a good guy despite that and 'merica. You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for validation and a mob. Or what you got, reciprocation and a platform. Now you're crying hard with the victim card.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.
Do I have all this right?
*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!
"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.
You're not real good at this.
Anonymous
06/05/2025 07:57
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.
Do I have all this right?
*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!
"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.
So the old bit about sticks and stones and names was wrong. Want some bactine? Or perhaps some friends? Maybe a therapy coupon?
Anonymous
06/05/2025 07:55
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Think you mean D.B. Cooper.Anonymous wrote:the best player in the area is the Spalding LSM - Roy Cooper.
Anonymous
06/05/2025 07:54
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.
Do I have all this right?
*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!
"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.
Anonymous
06/05/2025 07:24
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Anonymous wrote:So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.
Do I have all this right?
*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!
Anonymous
06/05/2025 07:15
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.
Do I have all this right?
Anonymous
06/05/2025 06:02
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.
Anonymous
06/04/2025 23:20
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.
Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.
Anonymous
06/04/2025 18:51
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
has the Washington Post All Met section even been released yet?
Maybe I missed it
Maybe I missed it
Anonymous
06/04/2025 18:09
Subject: 2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates
This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.