Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s satisfying to watch Tesla falling apart.

Who did they think was buying Teslas? Trump rednecks? Trumpers can’t afford eggs. It was liberals - well educated and well paid.

You are not a good businessman if you don’t know your target audience.

This isnt true. Its been researched. The owners are evenly split politically. I'm a Trump redneck and I own 3 Teslas. And eggs!

Sure, and I’m the reincarnation of James Dean.

Teslas are city cars, and Trump voters, as a whole, are not city dwellers. I travel frequently to visit family in deep red areas, and have never seen a Tesla. Plenty in and around DC, and those mostly were people who bought them before he started wearing clothes and saluting in homage to Nazis. I think possibly some not super-MAGA Republicans and Libertarians also bought into Tesla. But in Trump country you will find posters with a Trump head superimposed over Rambo’s body, and Let’s Go Brandon bumper stickers all over the place. You will not find a Tesla or Cybertruck.

I live in Atlanta, own 3 Teslas, and voted for Trump. Teslas are quite common in Georgia, which went for Trump. But, people dont buy Teslas for a political statement. They are great cars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


This is interesting, but which cars use lidar for full self driving? Is there one and how much does it cost?

Also, the fog test would fail with a human driver as well. One thing about the FSD on a Tesla is that if something is hard for a human to see, it will also be hard for the FSD to see. So you may be about as safe as driving yourself in many situations. To be fair Tesla does warn you when the cameras are not working and that you need to be vigilant. It will say something like "camera view is degraded" when environmental issues are an issue.


Every other system aiming for "full self driving" uses Lidar for the reasons shown in the video. Some of them are certainly unlikely and yes you as a regular driver couldn't do better in the fog test in particular. But isn't that the point? An objectively better tech exists which increases safety and reliability, and on the personal decision of Leon, Tesla doesn't have it. It's a childish decision based on childish logic. The reason why your eyes are better than camera is because it's not just your eyes- it's your visual correct and rest of your brain that can put things in context. You can also adjust and do things like move your head for a different angle, etc

A real.engineer understands the limitations of just the cameras and uses other tools to improve. Leon "simplifies" and endangers people.

You didn't answer how much it costs and whether I can buy one?

As usual nowadays, Reddit has the best info.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/s/VgndhXXusW

Also, can not be stressed enough how poorly Tesla does with quality control and manufacturing consistency.

https://electrek.co/2024/12/16/tesla-major-issue-self-driving-computer-inside-new-cars/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please keep your TDS and your irrational hatred of Musk out of this. But the stock is down 48% from its all-time high!

Even if you acknowledge that Musk has alienated many consumers, he may just as well bring in many new customers (Republicans have bought EVs at much lower rates than Democrats in the past).

More importantly, over time, the best product tends to win. And with the possible exception of some of the Chinese EVs (which will never be sold in the US), Teslas are the best EVs in the world. While there have been some recent reports of lower sales figures, nothing about the product or business has fundamentally changed in the last few months to warrant a 48% decline in share price.

And lastly, Tesla is not even strictly an automobile company anymore. They have lots of innovation in AI and other areas. I dunno, as someone who usually just buys index funds, I’m pretty tempted to load up on $TSLA stock. Thoughts?

Because you support Trump and use stupid words like TDS I’m going to say you should full port into TSLA. It’s a winning stock. In no way are its cars not flying off the shelves in China or Europe. Elon is beloved over there. So is Trump. I hope you make the right choose and actually buy a 3x leveraged Tesla etf so you can be rich like the smart person you are.

Anonymous wrote:

Starlink is a buy here, SpaceX is a buy here, but not TSLA.

And that is only because nobody can tell if you are using Starlink and SpaceX is the only rocket out there (that really functions at that price---he is winning on price because of reusable boosters). Tesla is a good car and the only reason it is declining is political (not because the car isn't worth it). In fact the car, especially the 3 and the Y are probably the best value cars on the EV market right now.

That doesn't mean politics won't run him out of business. It has happened before so I don't discount anything. That said, I own Tesla stock and don't plan to sell it. There is upside potential once we get past the mess we are in now. You have to invest for the long term. It's not going out of business anytime soon. They might have to lower the price on the cars, but that's okay. People will buy them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


This is interesting, but which cars use lidar for full self driving? Is there one and how much does it cost?

Also, the fog test would fail with a human driver as well. One thing about the FSD on a Tesla is that if something is hard for a human to see, it will also be hard for the FSD to see. So you may be about as safe as driving yourself in many situations. To be fair Tesla does warn you when the cameras are not working and that you need to be vigilant. It will say something like "camera view is degraded" when environmental issues are an issue.


Every other system aiming for "full self driving" uses Lidar for the reasons shown in the video. Some of them are certainly unlikely and yes you as a regular driver couldn't do better in the fog test in particular. But isn't that the point? An objectively better tech exists which increases safety and reliability, and on the personal decision of Leon, Tesla doesn't have it. It's a childish decision based on childish logic. The reason why your eyes are better than camera is because it's not just your eyes- it's your visual correct and rest of your brain that can put things in context. You can also adjust and do things like move your head for a different angle, etc

A real.engineer understands the limitations of just the cameras and uses other tools to improve. Leon "simplifies" and endangers people.

You didn't answer how much it costs and whether I can buy one?

As usual nowadays, Reddit has the best info.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/s/VgndhXXusW

Anonymous wrote:Please keep your TDS and your irrational hatred of Musk out of this. But the stock is down 48% from its all-time high!

Even if you acknowledge that Musk has alienated many consumers, he may just as well bring in many new customers (Republicans have bought EVs at much lower rates than Democrats in the past).

More importantly, over time, the best product tends to win. And with the possible exception of some of the Chinese EVs (which will never be sold in the US), Teslas are the best EVs in the world. While there have been some recent reports of lower sales figures, nothing about the product or business has fundamentally changed in the last few months to warrant a 48% decline in share price.

And lastly, Tesla is not even strictly an automobile company anymore. They have lots of innovation in AI and other areas. I dunno, as someone who usually just buys index funds, I’m pretty tempted to load up on $TSLA stock. Thoughts?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


This is interesting, but which cars use lidar for full self driving? Is there one and how much does it cost?

Also, the fog test would fail with a human driver as well. One thing about the FSD on a Tesla is that if something is hard for a human to see, it will also be hard for the FSD to see. So you may be about as safe as driving yourself in many situations. To be fair Tesla does warn you when the cameras are not working and that you need to be vigilant. It will say something like "camera view is degraded" when environmental issues are an issue.


Every other system aiming for "full self driving" uses Lidar for the reasons shown in the video. Some of them are certainly unlikely and yes you as a regular driver couldn't do better in the fog test in particular. But isn't that the point? An objectively better tech exists which increases safety and reliability, and on the personal decision of Leon, Tesla doesn't have it. It's a childish decision based on childish logic. The reason why your eyes are better than camera is because it's not just your eyes- it's your visual correct and rest of your brain that can put things in context. You can also adjust and do things like move your head for a different angle, etc

A real.engineer understands the limitations of just the cameras and uses other tools to improve. Leon "simplifies" and endangers people.

You didn't answer how much it costs and whether I can buy one?

Anonymous wrote:


This is interesting, but which cars use lidar for full self driving? Is there one and how much does it cost?

Also, the fog test would fail with a human driver as well. One thing about the FSD on a Tesla is that if something is hard for a human to see, it will also be hard for the FSD to see. So you may be about as safe as driving yourself in many situations. To be fair Tesla does warn you when the cameras are not working and that you need to be vigilant. It will say something like "camera view is degraded" when environmental issues are an issue.


Every other system aiming for "full self driving" uses Lidar for the reasons shown in the video. Some of them are certainly unlikely and yes you as a regular driver couldn't do better in the fog test in particular. But isn't that the point? An objectively better tech exists which increases safety and reliability, and on the personal decision of Leon, Tesla doesn't have it. It's a childish decision based on childish logic. The reason why your eyes are better than camera is because it's not just your eyes- it's your visual correct and rest of your brain that can put things in context. You can also adjust and do things like move your head for a different angle, etc

A real.engineer understands the limitations of just the cameras and uses other tools to improve. Leon "simplifies" and endangers people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What I like about Tesla is the integrated software that makes it easy to use.

But engineering wise it is not as good as Honda/Toyota or even Ford/GM.

More importantly Tesla's made since 2022 are very dangerous. Cars use Vision for cruise control and safety features. If Vision fails, they have radar to act as failover. Then they have Ultrasonic sensors for very short range detection for final 3rd level safety mechanism.

So if Vision fails for some reason, the radar would act as a check and if even radar fails, the Ultrasonic sensors would act as a final check to stop the vehicle from slamming into an object.

Tesla removed the radar and ultrasonic sensors from vehicles made since 2022 as Musk felt that having these safety features made the software engineers developing the software lazy and they are not improving the system enough. In addition, these costs more money. So now, Tesla's made after 2022 are without these safety features and it dramatically increases tail risks.


And perfect timing, this video was just released today showing nice comparisons between the two systems. The key part starts at the 9 minute mark


https://youtu.be/IQJL3htsDyQ?si=5Ph7h9cZOBOdw4JH

This is interesting, but which cars use lidar for full self driving? Is there one and how much does it cost?

Also, the fog test would fail with a human driver as well. One thing about the FSD on a Tesla is that if something is hard for a human to see, it will also be hard for the FSD to see. So you may be about as safe as driving yourself in many situations. To be fair Tesla does warn you when the cameras are not working and that you need to be vigilant. It will say something like "camera view is degraded" when environmental issues are an issue.

Every other system aiming for "full self driving" uses Lidar for the reasons shown in the video. Some of them are certainly unlikely and yes you as a regular driver couldn't do better in the fog test in particular. But isn't that the point? An objectively better tech exists which increases safety and reliability, and on the personal decision of Leon, Tesla doesn't have it. It's a childish decision based on childish logic. The reason why your eyes are better than camera is because it's not just your eyes- it's your visual correct and rest of your brain that can put things in context. You can also adjust and do things like move your head for a different angle, etc

A real.engineer understands the limitations of just the cameras and uses other tools to improve. Leon "simplifies" and endangers people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What I like about Tesla is the integrated software that makes it easy to use.

But engineering wise it is not as good as Honda/Toyota or even Ford/GM.

More importantly Tesla's made since 2022 are very dangerous. Cars use Vision for cruise control and safety features. If Vision fails, they have radar to act as failover. Then they have Ultrasonic sensors for very short range detection for final 3rd level safety mechanism.

So if Vision fails for some reason, the radar would act as a check and if even radar fails, the Ultrasonic sensors would act as a final check to stop the vehicle from slamming into an object.

Tesla removed the radar and ultrasonic sensors from vehicles made since 2022 as Musk felt that having these safety features made the software engineers developing the software lazy and they are not improving the system enough. In addition, these costs more money. So now, Tesla's made after 2022 are without these safety features and it dramatically increases tail risks.


And perfect timing, this video was just released today showing nice comparisons between the two systems. The key part starts at the 9 minute mark


https://youtu.be/IQJL3htsDyQ?si=5Ph7h9cZOBOdw4JH

This is interesting, but which cars use lidar for full self driving? Is there one and how much does it cost?

Also, the fog test would fail with a human driver as well. One thing about the FSD on a Tesla is that if something is hard for a human to see, it will also be hard for the FSD to see. So you may be about as safe as driving yourself in many situations. To be fair Tesla does warn you when the cameras are not working and that you need to be vigilant. It will say something like "camera view is degraded" when environmental issues are an issue.

https://www.voltequity.com/board

Anonymous wrote:
What I like about Tesla is the integrated software that makes it easy to use.

But engineering wise it is not as good as Honda/Toyota or even Ford/GM.

More importantly Tesla's made since 2022 are very dangerous. Cars use Vision for cruise control and safety features. If Vision fails, they have radar to act as failover. Then they have Ultrasonic sensors for very short range detection for final 3rd level safety mechanism.

So if Vision fails for some reason, the radar would act as a check and if even radar fails, the Ultrasonic sensors would act as a final check to stop the vehicle from slamming into an object.

Tesla removed the radar and ultrasonic sensors from vehicles made since 2022 as Musk felt that having these safety features made the software engineers developing the software lazy and they are not improving the system enough. In addition, these costs more money. So now, Tesla's made after 2022 are without these safety features and it dramatically increases tail risks.


And perfect timing, this video was just released today showing nice comparisons between the two systems. The key part starts at the 9 minute mark


https://youtu.be/IQJL3htsDyQ?si=5Ph7h9cZOBOdw4JH

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s satisfying to watch Tesla falling apart.

Who did they think was buying Teslas? Trump rednecks? Trumpers can’t afford eggs. It was liberals - well educated and well paid.

You are not a good businessman if you don’t know your target audience.

This isnt true. Its been researched. The owners are evenly split politically. I'm a Trump redneck and I own 3 Teslas. And eggs!

Anonymous wrote:What I like about Tesla is the integrated software that makes it easy to use.

But engineering wise it is not as good as Honda/Toyota or even Ford/GM.

More importantly Tesla's made since 2022 are very dangerous. Cars use Vision for cruise control and safety features. If Vision fails, they have radar to act as failover. Then they have Ultrasonic sensors for very short range detection for final 3rd level safety mechanism.

So if Vision fails for some reason, the radar would act as a check and if even radar fails, the Ultrasonic sensors would act as a final check to stop the vehicle from slamming into an object.

Tesla removed the radar and ultrasonic sensors from vehicles made since 2022 as Musk felt that having these safety features made the software engineers developing the software lazy and they are not improving the system enough. In addition, these costs more money. So now, Tesla's made after 2022 are without these safety features and it dramatically increases tail risks.