Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
It'll help out Canadians. They are in a pickle right now and statehood could help a lot. If they elect Polievre, though, this plan is toast.
Canada would not be one state, it would be ten new states electing 20 Senators who could vote to convict in Trump’s next impeachment.
Trump offered them statehood. Not states-hood. They can be #51. That's generous of us and they don't get to dictate the terms. Although I personally would be open to letting the Quebecois have their own state.
Anonymous wrote:.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
It'll help out Canadians. They are in a pickle right now and statehood could help a lot. If they elect Polievre, though, this plan is toast.
Canada would not be one state, it would be ten new states electing 20 Senators who could vote to convict in Trump’s next impeachment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
It'll help out Canadians. They are in a pickle right now and statehood could help a lot. If they elect Polievre, though, this plan is toast.
They will join the EU not the US. Specially if Iceland joins the EU.
Anonymous wrote:.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
It'll help out Canadians. They are in a pickle right now and statehood could help a lot. If they elect Polievre, though, this plan is toast.
Canada would not be one state, it would be ten new states electing 20 Senators who could vote to convict in Trump’s next impeachment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read that Panama profits 2.5 billion per year, almost entirely from the US, from canal fees collected. I do feel that’s far too much they’re making from us.
Is it true that we also give millions to maintain the canal, beyond the fees for each ship to go through? Can anyone confirm that? I would certainly expect them to pay for their own repairs from whatever fees they collect.
We’ve provided a lot of jobs there with the canal - there shouldn’t be an enormous profit on top of that. We gave them independence and built the thing in the first place - paid by American tax dollars and American lives. It’s their choice if they want to rip off other countries but they shouldn’t be allowed to rip us off.
Four things. One, if the US government pays anything, it’s for US military ships to pass through the canal. And it’s not like large ships— like aircraft carriers— can transit the canal. Most revenue comes from private businesses (American and otherwise) transporting goods through the canal to the US. And the fee structure is tied to size, freight and operation cost. Those businesses would not pay less money if the US owned the canal. They would just write the check to someone different. As a nation, we aren’t paying much to use the Panama Canal. As consumers, we pay the cost added to good— but the cost of goods isn’t more because ships pay Panama instead of the US.
Two- NOPE. The Panama Canal Authority collects fees and pays for maintenance. The Us does not pay to maintain the canal.
https://maintenanceworld.com/2023/05/17/panama-canal-maintenance-to-extend-life-another-100-years/#:~:text=Each%20year%20the%20canal%20authority,is%20currently%20experiencing%20a%20drought.
Three— you want it back? We never owned it to begin with. Before we turned it over, we leased it and paid a lump sum up front and annual fees to Panama to lease the canal. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/panama-canal-turned-over-to-panama
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
It'll help out Canadians. They are in a pickle right now and statehood could help a lot. If they elect Polievre, though, this plan is toast.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
It'll help out Canadians. They are in a pickle right now and statehood could help a lot. If they elect Polievre, though, this plan is toast.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
It'll help out Canadians. They are in a pickle right now and statehood could help a lot. If they elect Polievre, though, this plan is toast.
Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love it!
I’m guessing you aren’t old enough to remember the last time the US fought an asymmetrical war in a jungle? Because my FIL was in Vietnam ans this massively pisses him off. (Spoiler alert, we’d have to take it by force. It’s not like Trump issues an EO and they hand it over).
Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.
The man likes to talk. Do you know any New Yorkers? I do. They all like to talk—a lot.
Anonymous wrote:The Panama thing makes slightly more sense to me now in terms of why Trump is spouting off about it. Same with Greenland.
But what in the world is Canada as a 51st state all about? Why would Trump think we want them to merge with us? I am baffled by this point.