Anonymous wrote:Of course while most of the world cheers the remarkable ousting of Assad, and the liberation of the Syrian people - here on DCUM it's just lots of tut tutting about the Jews.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
of course Iran was busy with Israel because Hamas made the disastrous decision to attack Israel … yet somehow the fall of Syria will be Israel’s fault and due to their colonization of Syria lol
There are some reports Israel is creating a “buffer zone” for the buffer zone.
Let’s make sure this “crisis doesn’t get to waste”, will be the advice Netanyahu will get from the hard liners in his administration.
seems like Hamas’s catastrophic miscalculation just keeps on compounding itself!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
That too but I really wonder if very behind the scenes there might have been anything. The US has certainly done things like that, thinking Iran-Contra.
My guess is the original uprising was fomented externally with this end in mind, not something that just happened organically. Not sure who would be involved, but I suppose you could make some good guesses. It’s probably part of some larger plan for the region that has been taking place over the last couple of decades or so. Things have been falling into place nicely so far.
Omg. read. none of this is unknown.
Iran, Russia and Hezbollah were propping up Assad. US/NATO armed insurgents. The Islamic State got involved against both insurgents and the Syrian government. Most recently the action was on the Turkish border with Turkey attacking Kurdish groups in Syria.
If your “good guesses” are that Israel is behind the Syrian civil war, your brain has fallen prey to the Jewish Space Lasers again.
No agenda here, just looking at the probabilities. I think this was wider than one country being involved. I think the original upheaval was probably stoked from the outside, same with Libya. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Iraq, Syria and Libya are basically failed nations now, in pretty short order too. Lebanon is also, and Jordan and Egypt may as well be. Iran is teetering on the edge. I think their government might collapse in the not too distant future. The gulf countries are irrelevant really, always have been.
true. Israel single handedly brought down Libya, Iraq and now Syria, with its space lasers.
Nobody is taking your bait regarding space lasers. The reason why nobody is taking the bait is because the consensus is that Israelis cannot even walk and chew gum at the same time if the U.S. isn’t doing all the work for them.
Israel is a welfare state. Nobody serious includes Israel in the group of nations capable of mustering the intellectual and engineering might to actually carry their own water, much less develop advanced weapons on their own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
That too but I really wonder if very behind the scenes there might have been anything. The US has certainly done things like that, thinking Iran-Contra.
My guess is the original uprising was fomented externally with this end in mind, not something that just happened organically. Not sure who would be involved, but I suppose you could make some good guesses. It’s probably part of some larger plan for the region that has been taking place over the last couple of decades or so. Things have been falling into place nicely so far.
Omg. read. none of this is unknown.
Iran, Russia and Hezbollah were propping up Assad. US/NATO armed insurgents. The Islamic State got involved against both insurgents and the Syrian government. Most recently the action was on the Turkish border with Turkey attacking Kurdish groups in Syria.
If your “good guesses” are that Israel is behind the Syrian civil war, your brain has fallen prey to the Jewish Space Lasers again.
No agenda here, just looking at the probabilities. I think this was wider than one country being involved. I think the original upheaval was probably stoked from the outside, same with Libya. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Iraq, Syria and Libya are basically failed nations now, in pretty short order too. Lebanon is also, and Jordan and Egypt may as well be. Iran is teetering on the edge. I think their government might collapse in the not too distant future. The gulf countries are irrelevant really, always have been.
true. Israel single handedly brought down Libya, Iraq and now Syria, with its space lasers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Syria has oil and a lot of natural gas. Assad was a Tyrant but destabilization by outside forces will not bring peace and democracy to the people. She has it ever? Israel will take the south, turkey the north and west cost and the US will give the oil fields in the east to whomever they want (even though the oil isn’t that great) it’s a tragedy.
Trum advice was "take the oil" in Iraq.
Anonymous wrote:Syria has oil and a lot of natural gas. Assad was a Tyrant but destabilization by outside forces will not bring peace and democracy to the people. She has it ever? Israel will take the south, turkey the north and west cost and the US will give the oil fields in the east to whomever they want (even though the oil isn’t that great) it’s a tragedy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
That too but I really wonder if very behind the scenes there might have been anything. The US has certainly done things like that, thinking Iran-Contra.
My guess is the original uprising was fomented externally with this end in mind, not something that just happened organically. Not sure who would be involved, but I suppose you could make some good guesses. It’s probably part of some larger plan for the region that has been taking place over the last couple of decades or so. Things have been falling into place nicely so far.
Omg. read. none of this is unknown.
Iran, Russia and Hezbollah were propping up Assad. US/NATO armed insurgents. The Islamic State got involved against both insurgents and the Syrian government. Most recently the action was on the Turkish border with Turkey attacking Kurdish groups in Syria.
If your “good guesses” are that Israel is behind the Syrian civil war, your brain has fallen prey to the Jewish Space Lasers again.
No agenda here, just looking at the probabilities. I think this was wider than one country being involved. I think the original upheaval was probably stoked from the outside, same with Libya. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Iraq, Syria and Libya are basically failed nations now, in pretty short order too. Lebanon is also, and Jordan and Egypt may as well be. Iran is teetering on the edge. I think their government might collapse in the not too distant future. The gulf countries are irrelevant really, always have been.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
of course Iran was busy with Israel because Hamas made the disastrous decision to attack Israel … yet somehow the fall of Syria will be Israel’s fault and due to their colonization of Syria lol
There are some reports Israel is creating a “buffer zone” for the buffer zone.
Let’s make sure this “crisis doesn’t get to waste”, will be the advice Netanyahu will get from the hard liners in his administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
of course Iran was busy with Israel because Hamas made the disastrous decision to attack Israel … yet somehow the fall of Syria will be Israel’s fault and due to their colonization of Syria lol
There are some reports Israel is creating a “buffer zone” for the buffer zone.
Let’s make sure this “crisis doesn’t get to waste”, will be the advice Netanyahu will get from the hard liners in his administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
That too but I really wonder if very behind the scenes there might have been anything. The US has certainly done things like that, thinking Iran-Contra.
My guess is the original uprising was fomented externally with this end in mind, not something that just happened organically. Not sure who would be involved, but I suppose you could make some good guesses. It’s probably part of some larger plan for the region that has been taking place over the last couple of decades or so. Things have been falling into place nicely so far.
Omg. read. none of this is unknown.
Iran, Russia and Hezbollah were propping up Assad. US/NATO armed insurgents. The Islamic State got involved against both insurgents and the Syrian government. Most recently the action was on the Turkish border with Turkey attacking Kurdish groups in Syria.
If your “good guesses” are that Israel is behind the Syrian civil war, your brain has fallen prey to the Jewish Space Lasers again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
of course Iran was busy with Israel because Hamas made the disastrous decision to attack Israel … yet somehow the fall of Syria will be Israel’s fault and due to their colonization of Syria lol
There are some reports Israel is creating a “buffer zone” for the buffer zone.
Let’s make sure this “crisis doesn’t get to waste”, will be the advice Netanyahu will get from the hard liners in his administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there any possibility Israel had any kind of hand in the rebels' success?
I don’t know if it is a trick question but obviously yes, not directly but indirectly.
Since Iran is very busy with Israel it neglected Syria which the rebels timed it perfectly to take over the country.
of course Iran was busy with Israel because Hamas made the disastrous decision to attack Israel … yet somehow the fall of Syria will be Israel’s fault and due to their colonization of Syria lol