The Democrats should be embarassed that Trump picked up Robert F Kennedy Jr and Tulsi Gabbard and they picked up Liz Cheney

Anonymous wrote:Florida Democratic representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Friday claimed that Tulsi Gabbard, US President-elect Trump's pick for director of national intelligence, is "likely a Russian asset,"

Did she call the hit on Seth Rich or was it Hillary?

Why did the Democrats think running a candidate under federal investigation by FBI for emails would be the best choice to run in a general?

Anonymous wrote:

cheated Bernie out of the nomination in 2016

you're funny. This was NEVER going to happen.

You’re the problem. I’m sure Bernie wouldn’t have lost Pennsylvania and Michigan. All indicators show Trump would’ve been destroyed in the general by Bernie and Bernie was beating Trump in freaking Oklahoma and other states. It’s too late now but the Obama/Clinton negativity has sunk the party to a new low. It was already getting nasty in the 2008 primaries. I knew the party would fall to the abyss when both leaders’s surrogates were put in charge of the party

Anonymous wrote:

cheated Bernie out of the nomination in 2016

you're funny. This was NEVER going to happen.

She’s a traitor to Jewish people and she was dismissed by her girl Hillary when the heat came.

I would rather have Tulsi in charge of national security and intelligence than hacks like DWS or Hillary. Look at the integrity here..

On January 22, 2013, Tulsi Gabbard was unanimously elected to a four-year term as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee. In September 2015, she criticized chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's decision to hold only six debates during the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries, compared with 26 in 2008 and 15 in 2004.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/

Right around the time of the convention, the leaked emails revealed Hillary’s campaign was grabbing money from the state parties for its own purposes, leaving the states with very little to support down-ballot races. A Politico story published on May 2, 2016, described the big fund-raising vehicle she had launched through the states the summer before, quoting a vow she had made to rebuild “the party from the ground up … when our state parties are strong, we win. That’s what will happen.”

Yet the states kept less than half of 1 percent of the $82 million they had amassed from the extravagant fund-raisers Hillary’s campaign was holding, just as Gary had described to me when he and I talked in August. When the Politico story described this arrangement as “essentially … money laundering” for the Clinton campaign, Hillary’s people were outraged at being accused of doing something shady. Bernie’s people were angry for their own reasons, saying this was part of a calculated strategy to throw the nomination to Hillary.


Tulsi saw all this go on and decided to call them all out. Was she wrong to call out Crooked Hillary and Debbie Wassweman Putz

cheated Bernie out of the nomination in 2016

you're funny. This was NEVER going to happen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shes a destabilizing opportunist. BTDT with her and Bernie and splitting the DNC in 2016. She's a vapid anything goes talking mouthpiece for Putin who's given her relevancy.

What politician isn’t an opportunist?

Surely Kamala Harris has to be the biggest opportunist of all time? Plotting as the VP to force the President out of the campaign so that she could lead the ticket.

Harris didn't force Biden out of anything. The 2024 election debacle can be blamed primarily on Biden and secondarily on the people that thought voting for a 77 year old 1st term POTUS candidate was a wise decision. Harris did nothing wrong.

Dana Rohrabacher for Director, NSA?

Anonymous wrote:Florida Democratic representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Friday claimed that Tulsi Gabbard, US President-elect Trump's pick for director of national intelligence, is "likely a Russian asset,"

She should be barred from public office and expelled from Florida. She’s the hack who dismissed a Jewish senior citizen out of the race and then got herself dismissed as well.

She’s a horrible person. She deserves cancellation and social ostracization

Anonymous wrote:Someone on Russian TV called her “our girlfriend “. I’d like to know more about why they said that.

I would like to know more as well

I’m a big believer in karma and I think Hillary was not meant to be President because of past karma. How she cheated state Democrats from their campaign money and cheated Bernie out of the nomination in 2016 and how she placed Islamic terrorist rumors about Obama and then called for his assasination Ala RFK told me all about her character.

I am sure she was happy that morning when she learned JFK Jr was not going to be a threat for the NY Senate

Florida Democratic representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Friday claimed that Tulsi Gabbard, US President-elect Trump's pick for director of national intelligence, is "likely a Russian asset,"

She’s not an opportunist. An opportunist would have stayed put at the DNC, not played whistleblower against a dynasty like the Clintons, and risked government intimidation and blacklisting via a terror watch list.

I guess Hawaii doesn’t make great politicians for Hillary lol. It’s definitely on her no fly list

Anonymous wrote:Shes a destabilizing opportunist. BTDT with her and Bernie and splitting the DNC in 2016. She's a vapid anything goes talking mouthpiece for Putin who's given her relevancy.

What politician isn’t an opportunist?

Surely Kamala Harris has to be the biggest opportunist of all time? Plotting as the VP to force the President out of the campaign so that she could lead the ticket.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

"all the options Trump has" hahahaha.... that's the problem; Trump has few viable options for any position because most if not all people of high regard and integrity will not accept his offer of appointment this go around. People like Mattis and Tillerson aren't going to subject themselves in a Trump Administration after Trump showed us his clear lack of integrity the 1st go around. Members of the GOP in congress may pretend to approve of Trump for the simple purpose of receiving a Trump endorsement for their next elections but 99% of those compromised folks hate Trump and are too smart to Pence themselves.