Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:23     Subject: Re:Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:I really don't GAF about the 60 Minutes interview. She is still a far better choice than the twice impeached, rapist and convicted felon running against her. And it ain't even close.

Agree. Mailed my voted yesterday.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:23     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
"The work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region."
Without mentioning Trump, tell me what this means.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:21     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did 60 minutes splice an answer to a different question onto the original question?


YES and as a card-carrying Democrat, I am LIVID.



Sure you are. At any rate, the above claim os false. They only edited out part of her answer. They didn't move stuff around. Go watch the damned youtube video.


Ahem. They edited out the entire answer that was promoted in the teaser video shown on Face the Nation. The Harris campaign got to CBS and demanded they edit that out. Why would they edit the clip that they actually promoted? It was one of her unpresidential word salads -- that's why.







wow, yup the news in is on it they are helping the election as they see "fit." huh?


People are saying, amirite?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:20     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did 60 minutes splice an answer to a different question onto the original question?


YES and as a card-carrying Democrat, I am LIVID.



Sure you are. At any rate, the above claim os false. They only edited out part of her answer. They didn't move stuff around. Go watch the damned youtube video.


Ahem. They edited out the entire answer that was promoted in the teaser video shown on Face the Nation. The Harris campaign got to CBS and demanded they edit that out. Why would they edit the clip that they actually promoted? It was one of her unpresidential word salads -- that's why.







wow, yup the news in is on it they are helping the election as they see "fit." huh?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:17     Subject: Re:Harris' 60 Minutes interview
I really don't GAF about the 60 Minutes interview. She is still a far better choice than the twice impeached, rapist and convicted felon running against her. And it ain't even close.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:15     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Instead of her rambling maybe she is just weaving like Trump does?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:15     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
She didn't mention Hannibal lecter or windmills once and never said she had a better body then a political rival.... All things Trump has said during an interview
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:13     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Instead of just all of the commentary I actually watched it and thought she came off just fine... I mean it was nothing mind-blowing but I can't say I've seen a political interview that has been.....
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 14:00     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Since the original answer saw the light of day beforehand her staff must have thought she sounded fine. It was only after getting scorched on social media that they memory-holed it.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 13:57     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did 60 minutes splice an answer to a different question onto the original question?


YES and as a card-carrying Democrat, I am LIVID.



Sure you are. At any rate, the above claim os false. They only edited out part of her answer. They didn't move stuff around. Go watch the damned youtube video.


Ahem. They edited out the entire answer that was promoted in the teaser video shown on Face the Nation. The Harris campaign got to CBS and demanded they edit that out. Why would they edit the clip that they actually promoted? It was one of her unpresidential word salads -- that's why.


Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 12:46     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:Her attempts at connecting with voters based on fake accents is the problem.
She should be connecting with them by leaning into she's a moron.


Trump's already entirely leaned into being the world's greatest moron, so he's got the moron vote locked down. Who more do you think that Harris can pick up this way?
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 12:41     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Her attempts at connecting with voters based on fake accents is the problem.
She should be connecting with them by leaning into she's a moron.
Anonymous
Post 10/10/2024 08:38     Subject: Re:Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:I remember their past reporting where they would mark a few auto parts and then bring problem cars to several garages for repair. No parts would be changed, they'd diagnose outlandish repairs, etc.

"Hi, I'm Mike Wallace from 60 Minutes. We'd like to ask you some questions...."

Boom! Doors would slam shut, Venetian blinds would close, everyone would scatter and the garage became a fortress. It was great fun to watch.

Investigative Journalism is dead.


Check out Pro Publica. You'll have to read rather than watch, but journalism is out there.

Anonymous
Post 10/09/2024 22:46     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:60 Minutes has a history of flat out lies and fabrications. This doesn't even rate compared to some other of their history.

They fabricated evidence that Audis in the 1980s were unintentionally accelerating and practically destroyed the company in the US. This is what the media does.


Goes further back. Westmoreland sued them for their editing, taking his answers and recording different questions to match those answers.
If you are being interviewed by the media, record it yourself.


Farther back? The Audi story was already almost 40 years ago. You had to go that far back to get some dirt on 60 Minutes.

Meanwhile, Newsmax, Breitbart, OAN, DailyWire, Washington Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, Western Journal, RSBN and other conservative "news" outlets lie on a daily basis as a matter of practice.


OK, 60 Minutes is the same level of journalism as Newsmax, Breitbart, OAN, DailyWire, Washington Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, Western Journal, RSBN
Anonymous
Post 10/09/2024 20:32     Subject: Harris' 60 Minutes interview
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:60 Minutes has a history of flat out lies and fabrications. This doesn't even rate compared to some other of their history.

They fabricated evidence that Audis in the 1980s were unintentionally accelerating and practically destroyed the company in the US. This is what the media does.


Goes further back. Westmoreland sued them for their editing, taking his answers and recording different questions to match those answers.
If you are being interviewed by the media, record it yourself.


Farther back? The Audi story was already almost 40 years ago. You had to go that far back to get some dirt on 60 Minutes.

Meanwhile, Newsmax, Breitbart, OAN, DailyWire, Washington Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, Western Journal, RSBN and other conservative "news" outlets lie on a daily basis as a matter of practice.