Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know Speaks is bringing in at least two mid year transfers. Current players and parents know he does this often!
That is messed up
Anonymous wrote:I know Speaks is bringing in at least two mid year transfers. Current players and parents know he does this often!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like Coach Speaks is doing his job.
SJC will own the boys down on Eye Street this Spring... I cant wait
Okkkkkaaaaayyyy. I think you said this last year too.
SJC wins the offseason every year.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like Coach Speaks is doing his job.
SJC will own the boys down on Eye Street this Spring... I cant wait
They had the same kids last year. What’s different?
What a stupid comment. The teams are not the same from last year. So that's changed you big dummy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like Coach Speaks is doing his job.
SJC will own the boys down on Eye Street this Spring... I cant wait
They had the same kids last year. What’s different?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like Coach Speaks is doing his job.
SJC will own the boys down on Eye Street this Spring... I cant wait
They had the same kids last year. What’s different?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like Coach Speaks is doing his job.
SJC will own the boys down on Eye Street this Spring... I cant wait
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The things is that SJC 27 and 28 classes are also pretty strong. Hardest jobs Speaks is going to have is getting these kids enough playing time not to bail. There should be a lot of blow-outs to work in the better 27s and maybe the top couple 28s.
I've chatted with some current SJC parents in both the 28 and 27 classes. While some parents are fully bought in on Speaks vision and year-round commitment to lacrosse, not everyone subscribes to that philosophy.
I do foresee some 28s and 27s transferring out - and some of them are pretty good.
but some are not; I can't imagine what their families were thinking going to a school where they have no prayer of getting to play.
and, too late for them to do anything now, but there are 2025's and 2026's who were great youth players and could have been good HS players, but then have faded away from lacrosse because the roster was too big and too good for them to break in.
Fake news. Smallest program outside of Bullis that is good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The things is that SJC 27 and 28 classes are also pretty strong. Hardest jobs Speaks is going to have is getting these kids enough playing time not to bail. There should be a lot of blow-outs to work in the better 27s and maybe the top couple 28s.
I've chatted with some current SJC parents in both the 28 and 27 classes. While some parents are fully bought in on Speaks vision and year-round commitment to lacrosse, not everyone subscribes to that philosophy.
I do foresee some 28s and 27s transferring out - and some of them are pretty good.
but some are not; I can't imagine what their families were thinking going to a school where they have no prayer of getting to play.
and, too late for them to do anything now, but there are 2025's and 2026's who were great youth players and could have been good HS players, but then have faded away from lacrosse because the roster was too big and too good for them to break in.
Anonymous wrote:There are 26’s from New England prep schools who have barely seen the field in a high school game, who are already committed to top D1 programs. If they’re good enough and play for a decent club team, they’ll get noticed.