Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is saying exactly what she thinks the voters want to hear - even if it's a total 180 from what she used to say.
Maybe she's trying to troll Trump into being against border security. Trump's whole platform these days seems to be nothing but knee jerk 180 from whatever "the other side" says and nothing more.
Either way it's pretty funny that the MAGAs are now trying to trash her for being pro border security. Make up your minds, people.
Anonymous wrote:Walz cannot answer directly either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're explaining, you're losing. Kamala is losing in this interview.
It's a prerecorded, heavily edited interview with friendly media which refuses to release the full interview and transcript. How bad is the rest of it? I can't imagine her in a room with Putin or Xi. Ooof.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're explaining, you're losing. Kamala is losing in this interview.
It's a prerecorded, heavily edited interview with friendly media which refuses to release the full interview and transcript. How bad is the rest of it? I can't imagine her in a room with Putin or Xi. Ooof.
There's no such thing as Democrat-friendly media. There's only corporate media which only cares about clicks and views, and right wing media, neither of which are friendly to Democrats.
And we've known that ever since the corporate media took Hillary down with that "Butter Emails" bullshit.
Anonymous wrote:She is saying exactly what she thinks the voters want to hear - even if it's a total 180 from what she used to say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She can’t stand alone. She’s weak and knows she’s not capable to be president. Is she going to add Walz chair to the Oval Office as well? Maybe get herself a booster seat so she can sit in the back and babble and laugh with joy?
Donald, is that you?
Donald is finishing a Town Hall in Wisconsin right now. Where is Kamala doing her Town Hall tonight?
Anonymous wrote:But is she making the Govt pay for IVF?
Anonymous wrote:Tulsi was correct when she said Kamala lacks confidence and nervously laughs because she doesn’t know what she stands for or what to say
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She can’t stand alone. She’s weak and knows she’s not capable to be president. Is she going to add Walz chair to the Oval Office as well? Maybe get herself a booster seat so she can sit in the back and babble and laugh with joy?
Donald, is that you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're explaining, you're losing. Kamala is losing in this interview.
It's a prerecorded, heavily edited interview with friendly media which refuses to release the full interview and transcript. How bad is the rest of it? I can't imagine her in a room with Putin or Xi. Ooof.
Anonymous wrote:She is saying exactly what she thinks the voters want to hear - even if it's a total 180 from what she used to say.
Anonymous wrote:Aaaaah, I thought she was going to launch into the "significance of the passage of time" when she said "the significance..."