Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you call a criticism “racist” or “sexist” it is because you are unable to call it “wrong.”

Okay— “ everyone knows” according to Trump, why Harris’s appearance means she won’t be taken seriously. He says it’s not her race or gender. But that we all know what he’s talking about.

If it’s not race and gender, I actually don't know. . What do we all know about the way she looks that isn’t race and gender and will cause world leaders to “walk all over her”? I want an answer. Since “we all know,” it should be easy for you to tell me.

But no one has.

If it is not race or sex, it is because she is attractive. Attractive women cannot be smart. Unfortunately many people believe that dumb shat. They think that only unattractive women are smart, because what else do they have going for them. Dumb, dumb, and more dumb are these people.

Ah. Was wondering what "play toy" meant in context. Like did Trump ever describe Angela Merkel as a "play toy?"

So for Republicans, "we all know" it is the norm to "walk all over" attractive women - including 59 year old women - in any kind of professional setting. It goes without saying. Duh. Republicans just stating the obvious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you call a criticism “racist” or “sexist” it is because you are unable to call it “wrong.”

Okay— “ everyone knows” according to Trump, why Harris’s appearance means she won’t be taken seriously. He says it’s not her race or gender. But that we all know what he’s talking about.

If it’s not race and gender, I actually don't know. . What do we all know about the way she looks that isn’t race and gender and will cause world leaders to “walk all over her”? I want an answer. Since “we all know,” it should be easy for you to tell me.

But no one has.

If it is not race or sex, it is because she is attractive. Attractive women cannot be smart. Unfortunately many people believe that dumb shat. They think that only unattractive women are smart, because what else do they have going for them. Dumb, dumb, and more dumb are these people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So, this is actually amazing. Trump just told a group of Black journalists that Kamala Harris only "turned Black" a few years ago. I'm assuming everyone in the audience is aware that VP Harris attended Howard and is a proud AKA.

I guess it’s ok to turn MAGA or Catholic but not Black!

Anonymous wrote:

So, this is actually amazing. Trump just told a group of Black journalists that Kamala Harris only "turned Black" a few years ago. I'm assuming everyone in the audience is aware that VP Harris attended Howard and is a proud AKA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you call a criticism “racist” or “sexist” it is because you are unable to call it “wrong.”

Okay— “ everyone knows” according to Trump, why Harris’s appearance means she won’t be taken seriously. He says it’s not her race or gender. But that we all know what he’s talking about.

If it’s not race and gender, I actually don't know. . What do we all know about the way she looks that isn’t race and gender and will cause world leaders to “walk all over her”? I want an answer. Since “we all know,” it should be easy for you to tell me.

But no one has.

This. Since it’s not her race or gender I’d really like to hear it spelled out for me. What exactly about her appearance will ensure this treatment?

Anonymous wrote:If you call a criticism “racist” or “sexist” it is because you are unable to call it “wrong.”

That is really bad logic

Something can be many things at once. But it's outrageous that a former president of the U.S. should ralk in a blatantly racist sexist manner.

Politicians can be wrong (often, God bless them.) But it's he behavior that is off the rails. And he's wrong too, but that's a given with Trump

Anonymous wrote:If you call a criticism “racist” or “sexist” it is because you are unable to call it “wrong.”

Okay. It’s wrong (and also racist and sexist). Trump is very capable of insulting people on multiple levels.

Anonymous wrote:If you call a criticism “racist” or “sexist” it is because you are unable to call it “wrong.”

Okay— “ everyone knows” according to Trump, why Harris’s appearance means she won’t be taken seriously. He says it’s not her race or gender. But that we all know what he’s talking about.

If it’s not race and gender, I actually don't know. . What do we all know about the way she looks that isn’t race and gender and will cause world leaders to “walk all over her”? I want an answer. Since “we all know,” it should be easy for you to tell me.

But no one has.

If you call a criticism “racist” or “sexist” it is because you are unable to call it “wrong.”

Here's some epic sexist and weird bs from Jesse Watters, a Fox "political commentator" (read: performer). Seriously, listen to it. It's astounding.

This thread will have fresh material every day given how tone deaf DJT and Vance are.

One of Fat Elvis's latest utterances about Kamala:

Donald Trump has claimed that Kamala Harris would be treated as a “play toy” by world leaders because of “how she looks” in the latest misogynistic comments to emerge from his camp.

The former president told Fox News Laura Ingraham in an interview, part of which aired on Tuesday night, that the vice president’s appearance means other leaders will “walk all over her”.

“She’ll be like a play toy,” he said. “They look at her and they say, ‘We can’t believe we got so lucky.’ They’re going to walk all over her.”

Trump wouldn’t spell out what exactly he meant, adding: “And I don’t want to say as to why. But a lot of people understand it.”


Trump says world leaders will walk all over Harris because of 'hose she looks'
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-harris-sexist-world-leaders-fox-news-b2588822.html

And this shocks no one. Here we go again.

Trumps says world leaders would no respect Harris based on her “Appearance”. “You know what 8m talking about”. But when asked said of course not her race or gender.

So tired of this cr*p

Gift link

https://wapo.st/4fnOmKh

John Kennedy (Vanderbilt University, BA; UVA, JD; and Oxford U, BCL) should know better.

PS. Interestingly, he was a Dem until 2007. He switched to the GOP after running unsuccessfully for U.S. Senate in 2004 and 2008.