Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance will wipe the floor with Kamala in a debate. LFG

In your dreams. She already called out his BS today in NC. She’s the sleeper hit you won’t see coming.

Vance will wipe the floor with her no doubt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance will wipe the floor with Kamala in a debate. LFG

In your dreams. She already called out his BS today in NC. She’s the sleeper hit you won’t see coming.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can’t wait to see this debate.

Sure Kamala.
This is the statement the Vance campaign released. You can’t blame them for wanting to wait until after the convention. The Dems are in such disarray.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump picked a great guy. Young, inspiring life story , not a neocon, in an interracial marriage, vet, dealt with addiction and abusive environment .

. He didn’t pick a tool like Haley or Little Marco. I’m glad he made a great VP choice that is anti WW3. Trump has my vote

Anti abortion, anti IVF, anti election integrity… who hurt him? Oh, his mommy. His mommy issues are the reason why he wants to control women.

He also wants to control the word women as belonging to women also. He’s mentioned the money spent in Ukraine should go as tax credits for working moms.

He understands poverty and struggle . Most moms in America are concerned about money not abortion

They are intrinsically related as most if not all moms know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...

His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting

I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.

Good grief. He enlisted in the Marines and served in a war zone. He did put his life on the line.

I bet you are unaware that Biden received at least 6 deferments from the draft. One because he had asthma as a teenager yet he also played sports.

Which branch did Kamala serve in?

Writing for a newspaper far from any combat is not "putting his life on the line"

He was a desk jockey.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance will wipe the floor with Kamala in a debate. LFG

In your dreams. She already called out his BS today in NC. She’s the sleeper hit you won’t see coming.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...

His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting

I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.

Good grief. He enlisted in the Marines and served in a war zone. He did put his life on the line.

I bet you are unaware that Biden received at least 6 deferments from the draft. One because he had asthma as a teenager yet he also played sports.

Which branch did Kamala serve in?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...

His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting

I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.

Anonymous wrote:There isn't any definition of Appalchia that includes where Vance grew up.

Anonymous wrote:Vance will wipe the floor with Kamala in a debate. LFG

Anonymous wrote:I think Biden needs to dump Kamala, and bring someone new aboard. That’s his best shot at winning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...

His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting