Anonymous wrote:Blah, blah blah ... so many paid trolls from CMC's marketing and sales dept on this and the other CMC thread.
\Anonymous wrote:Blah, blah blah ... so many paid trolls from CMC's marketing and sales dept on this and the other CMC thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has shown interest in Claremont Mckenna, which I 100% wrote off as a mediocre LAC. Then reading through their Roberts Campus and massive alum donation campaign, I am shocked this tiny place hasn't shot to the top of students' lists. They're doubling campus footprint, investing hundreds of thousands to improve research opportunities and internship opportunities, and building a fancy new science department. What is the catch?
Claremont McKenna has always been regarded as one of the top SLACs. It's just in California and the DCUM (emphasis on "DC" area) don't discuss such schools much.
Is it? I feel like the LAC quality drops fast after Bowdoin and Middlebury. Would never send my kids to Hamilton or Colby or...Claremont Mckenna. Sure, they're ranked well, but there's no advantage to paying for it over UMD.
+1!
Lol. You know nothing!
stop it, CMC booster! are you paid by the college? you're everywhere. it's getting weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a NP and haven’t read the entire thread. I chose CMC 20 years ago over a bunch of east coast schools that everyone has head of (Dartmouth, Penn, Amherst, Swarthmore) as well as Pomona. I ended up in law school on the east coast and live here now, and sometimes wish I had gone to a school more people had heard of and with more alumni. I have never wished for a different college experience though — it was a phenomenal place to be a student and I couldn’t have asked for a better combo of campus life and academics.
Name recognition has vastly improved with CMC alum moving more and more to notable industries. It is a very young college.
Town & Country included CMC in a 2023 article, "The 15 Colleges with the Best Alumni Networks." This is the entire list, which appeared alphabetically and was not ranked:
Bucknell
Claremont McKenna
Dartmouth
Fordham
Hamilton
Ohio State
Penn State
Princeton
Smith College
Texas A&M
UAlabama
Notre Dame
Richmond
Villanova
Virginia Tech
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/g44675332/colleges-with-the-best-alumni-networks/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a NP and haven’t read the entire thread. I chose CMC 20 years ago over a bunch of east coast schools that everyone has head of (Dartmouth, Penn, Amherst, Swarthmore) as well as Pomona. I ended up in law school on the east coast and live here now, and sometimes wish I had gone to a school more people had heard of and with more alumni. I have never wished for a different college experience though — it was a phenomenal place to be a student and I couldn’t have asked for a better combo of campus life and academics.
Name recognition has vastly improved with CMC alum moving more and more to notable industries. It is a very young college.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a NP and haven’t read the entire thread. I chose CMC 20 years ago over a bunch of east coast schools that everyone has head of (Dartmouth, Penn, Amherst, Swarthmore) as well as Pomona. I ended up in law school on the east coast and live here now, and sometimes wish I had gone to a school more people had heard of and with more alumni. I have never wished for a different college experience though — it was a phenomenal place to be a student and I couldn’t have asked for a better combo of campus life and academics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has shown interest in Claremont Mckenna, which I 100% wrote off as a mediocre LAC. Then reading through their Roberts Campus and massive alum donation campaign, I am shocked this tiny place hasn't shot to the top of students' lists. They're doubling campus footprint, investing hundreds of thousands to improve research opportunities and internship opportunities, and building a fancy new science department. What is the catch?
Claremont McKenna has always been regarded as one of the top SLACs. It's just in California and the DCUM (emphasis on "DC" area) don't discuss such schools much.
Is it? I feel like the LAC quality drops fast after Bowdoin and Middlebury. Would never send my kids to Hamilton or Colby or...Claremont Mckenna. Sure, they're ranked well, but there's no advantage to paying for it over UMD.
+1!
Lol. You know nothing!
stop it, CMC booster! are you paid by the college? you're everywhere. it's getting weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has shown interest in Claremont Mckenna, which I 100% wrote off as a mediocre LAC. Then reading through their Roberts Campus and massive alum donation campaign, I am shocked this tiny place hasn't shot to the top of students' lists. They're doubling campus footprint, investing hundreds of thousands to improve research opportunities and internship opportunities, and building a fancy new science department. What is the catch?
Claremont McKenna has always been regarded as one of the top SLACs. It's just in California and the DCUM (emphasis on "DC" area) don't discuss such schools much.
Is it? I feel like the LAC quality drops fast after Bowdoin and Middlebury. Would never send my kids to Hamilton or Colby or...Claremont Mckenna. Sure, they're ranked well, but there's no advantage to paying for it over UMD.
+1!
Lol. You know nothing!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has shown interest in Claremont Mckenna, which I 100% wrote off as a mediocre LAC. Then reading through their Roberts Campus and massive alum donation campaign, I am shocked this tiny place hasn't shot to the top of students' lists. They're doubling campus footprint, investing hundreds of thousands to improve research opportunities and internship opportunities, and building a fancy new science department. What is the catch?
Claremont McKenna has always been regarded as one of the top SLACs. It's just in California and the DCUM (emphasis on "DC" area) don't discuss such schools much.
Is it? I feel like the LAC quality drops fast after Bowdoin and Middlebury. Would never send my kids to Hamilton or Colby or...Claremont Mckenna. Sure, they're ranked well, but there's no advantage to paying for it over UMD.
+1!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has shown interest in Claremont Mckenna, which I 100% wrote off as a mediocre LAC. Then reading through their Roberts Campus and massive alum donation campaign, I am shocked this tiny place hasn't shot to the top of students' lists. They're doubling campus footprint, investing hundreds of thousands to improve research opportunities and internship opportunities, and building a fancy new science department. What is the catch?
Claremont McKenna has always been regarded as one of the top SLACs. It's just in California and the DCUM (emphasis on "DC" area) don't discuss such schools much.
Is it? I feel like the LAC quality drops fast after Bowdoin and Middlebury. Would never send my kids to Hamilton or Colby or...Claremont Mckenna. Sure, they're ranked well, but there's no advantage to paying for it over UMD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has shown interest in Claremont Mckenna, which I 100% wrote off as a mediocre LAC. Then reading through their Roberts Campus and massive alum donation campaign, I am shocked this tiny place hasn't shot to the top of students' lists. They're doubling campus footprint, investing hundreds of thousands to improve research opportunities and internship opportunities, and building a fancy new science department. What is the catch?
Nobody paying the slightest bit of attention would write it off as "mediocre."
It’s VERY mediocre compared to the good lacs.