Anonymous wrote:Bad Bunny lost more [percentage] of the Super Bowl viewership from the end of the second quarter than has ever happened before.—Nielsen ratings

Not quite. Super Bowl LX draws an average 124.9 million viewers, Bad Bunny 128.2 million.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7036613/2026/02/10/super-bowl-ratings-nfl-nbc-bad-bunny/

Bad Bunny lost more [percentage] of the Super Bowl viewership from the end of the second quarter than has ever happened before.—Nielsen ratings

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a snooze-fest! Terrible choreography. Bad singing. Indecent dancing. It was easy for the whole house party to go to the bathroom during halftime because there was a low quality halftime show on.

Yeah! They should have chosen a multi-award winning worldwide beloved talent like Kid Rock! Ammirite?!

It will serve you people right if they just go back to using marching bands for the half time show.

I don’t know who Kid Rock is, but a marching band would be more enjoyable than that Awful Bunny.

I'm sorry - as a liberal person of color I do not think that Bad Bunny is talented or unifying or gender (female) uplifting. I think he is being celebrating due to our current times when anything against... has to be supported. He can neither sing well and he appears like a male ego artist, so what if he expressed anti-Ice, many people are doing that, and that does not mean he is great. There is a sad distortion.

I though the halftime show was positive and upbeat, and I liked the message. The music seemed ok, but nothing in it called to me.

Forgot to add - I think he's handsome, which probably adds to the appeal.

I though the halftime show was positive and upbeat, and I liked the message. The music seemed ok, but nothing in it called to me.

his lure? like his fishing lure?

He lures you, today's Pied Piper!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me like I’m 5?

The ... "lure?"

Do you mean to say the "appeal?"

OP is mixing up "allure" and "lure." Apparently a person not particularly proficient in English, wants us to explain the appeal of someone who sings in Spanish.

Anonymous wrote:What a snooze-fest! Terrible choreography. Bad singing. Indecent dancing. It was easy for the whole house party to go to the bathroom during halftime because there was a low quality halftime show on.

Yeah! They should have chosen a multi-award winning worldwide beloved talent like Kid Rock! Ammirite?!

It will serve you people right if they just go back to using marching bands for the half time show.

What a snooze-fest! Terrible choreography. Bad singing. Indecent dancing. It was easy for the whole house party to go to the bathroom during halftime because there was a low quality halftime show on.

Anonymous wrote:To me like I’m 5?

The ... "lure?"

Do you mean to say the "appeal?"

He makes music that people want to shake their booty to

Not reading this thread, but it’s allure not lure!

Talent and/or wide appeal has never been a criteria for the super bowl performer. People are just mad that he speaks Spanish.