Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its shocking that anyone could think its racist to want to know the identity of the reckless driver. They killed three people. They're in custody. What were they charged with? We have an interest in knowing who they were and what their punishment was. "Call the Park Police" is a joke response, they are infamous for their lack of transparency (and brutality)
Are they in custody?
Isn't it outrageous if they're not in custody? They killed three people. Or they're off the hook since the police shouldn't have been chasing them in the first place? I don't understand this at all.
Anonymous wrote:Its shocking that anyone could think its racist to want to know the identity of the reckless driver. They killed three people. They're in custody. What were they charged with? We have an interest in knowing who they were and what their punishment was. "Call the Park Police" is a joke response, they are infamous for their lack of transparency (and brutality)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its shocking that anyone could think its racist to want to know the identity of the reckless driver. They killed three people. They're in custody. What were they charged with? We have an interest in knowing who they were and what their punishment was. "Call the Park Police" is a joke response, they are infamous for their lack of transparency (and brutality)
Are they in custody?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
It’s public business to know whether the new city council implemented policy of not taking away drivers licenses from dangerous drivers out of “fairness” is negatively affecting public safety. This driver had thousands of unpaid speeding tickets. But somehow it’s “equitable” for the entire city that poor people get special privileges to just drive crazy and cause accidents. I’d like to know the name and background of the speeder. Is that so hard to understand? It’s nice to have some metrics and quantifiable data to back this obviously reckless city led policy. Is it making the city less safe? Yes.
+1
An obsessive fixation on"equity" is so 2020. If the Dems don't realize that public safety concerns trump that, well then, we'll get Trump again.
I consider myself a progressive liberal but I think letting people get away with speeding, reckless driving, accidents, public safety danger has NOTHING to do with equity. Anyone who thinks it does is a dipshit who has no business being anywhere near public policy. People get away with that kind of behavior is inexcusable and points to complete dysfunction and ineptitude, not policy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
It’s public business to know whether the new city council implemented policy of not taking away drivers licenses from dangerous drivers out of “fairness” is negatively affecting public safety. This driver had thousands of unpaid speeding tickets. But somehow it’s “equitable” for the entire city that poor people get special privileges to just drive crazy and cause accidents. I’d like to know the name and background of the speeder. Is that so hard to understand? It’s nice to have some metrics and quantifiable data to back this obviously reckless city led policy. Is it making the city less safe? Yes.
+1
An obsessive fixation on"equity" is so 2020. If the Dems don't realize that public safety concerns trump that, well then, we'll get Trump again.
I consider myself a progressive liberal but I think letting people get away with speeding, reckless driving, accidents, public safety danger has NOTHING to do with equity. Anyone who thinks it does is a dipshit who has no business being anywhere near public policy. People get away with that kind of behavior is inexcusable and points to complete dysfunction and ineptitude, not policy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
It’s public business to know whether the new city council implemented policy of not taking away drivers licenses from dangerous drivers out of “fairness” is negatively affecting public safety. This driver had thousands of unpaid speeding tickets. But somehow it’s “equitable” for the entire city that poor people get special privileges to just drive crazy and cause accidents. I’d like to know the name and background of the speeder. Is that so hard to understand? It’s nice to have some metrics and quantifiable data to back this obviously reckless city led policy. Is it making the city less safe? Yes.
+1
An obsessive fixation on"equity" is so 2020. If the Dems don't realize that public safety concerns trump that, well then, we'll get Trump again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
It’s public business to know whether the new city council implemented policy of not taking away drivers licenses from dangerous drivers out of “fairness” is negatively affecting public safety. This driver had thousands of unpaid speeding tickets. But somehow it’s “equitable” for the entire city that poor people get special privileges to just drive crazy and cause accidents. I’d like to know the name and background of the speeder. Is that so hard to understand? It’s nice to have some metrics and quantifiable data to back this obviously reckless city led policy. Is it making the city less safe? Yes.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
It’s public business to know whether the new city council implemented policy of not taking away drivers licenses from dangerous drivers out of “fairness” is negatively affecting public safety. This driver had thousands of unpaid speeding tickets. But somehow it’s “equitable” for the entire city that poor people get special privileges to just drive crazy and cause accidents. I’d like to know the name and background of the speeder. Is that so hard to understand? It’s nice to have some metrics and quantifiable data to back this obviously reckless city led policy. Is it making the city less safe? Yes.
Anonymous wrote:Its shocking that anyone could think its racist to want to know the identity of the reckless driver. They killed three people. They're in custody. What were they charged with? We have an interest in knowing who they were and what their punishment was. "Call the Park Police" is a joke response, they are infamous for their lack of transparency (and brutality)
Anonymous wrote:I’m still waiting for the name of the shooter in the fatal carjacking in Potomac Yards / Alexandria last May.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
They are not actually interested in knowing, because they could find out with a couple phone calls. What they want is for the media to report it so that they can guffaw about it online in vaguely racists ways with other people.
It's racist to be angry when three people are senselessly killed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
They are not actually interested in knowing, because they could find out with a couple phone calls. What they want is for the media to report it so that they can guffaw about it online in vaguely racists ways with other people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, this story does not fit into any narrative that the city cares about:
1. No police brutality
2. Shows that traffic cameras are not about public safety
3. Shows that no one needs to pay traffic tickets
4. Driver will probably have a rap sheet a mile long
So we may never hear anything about the case again.
What are you seeking to find out exactly?
Not PP, but it is certainly reasonable to want to know who killed three people despite a well-documented history of reckless driving.
What business of it is yours to know who they are? Are you a racist?
They are not actually interested in knowing, because they could find out with a couple phone calls. What they want is for the media to report it so that they can guffaw about it online in vaguely racists ways with other people.