Anonymous wrote:A millennial has a son in high school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op you suck.
Itās not āaskingā to take time off, theyāre not your slaves. They are telling you they will be gone. Stop being a jerk.
NP. Thatās not accurate. Vacation requests need to be approved. You donāt ātellā anyone youāll be goneā¦despite how much you wish you could. When you are a partner, principal or owner, you can ātell.ā Until then you ask, like everyone else.
+1. Some of you clearly donāt work in the private sector. Iāve never had a job where I didnāt have to seek managerās approval to take time off.
I work in the private sector at a director level. I tell my leadership when I will be out, and my team tells me when they will be out. If multiple people are out at the same time, we work together to coordinate coverage / work ahead / adjust accordingly. People have earned their PTO and they should be able to use it for the things that are important to them.
Anonymous wrote:Are many of the posters in such low level jobs that nobody would notice two people being out of the office at the same time or some generic temp could easily be slotted in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your organization is so incredibly short staffed that there is literally no back up, plan for a situation where someone has a heart attack or is hospitalized or someoneās parent dies. The problem is not really with the employees. And the same is true with the school system. Ideally, there would be one or two highly trained individuals who are like permanent on-call substitutes for a school who can easily swap in when someone is out Iām saying this is someone who graded finals from a hospital room while high on narcotics because there was no one else who could fulfill that function. here the problem is not with the teacher or the employee but with a system that has no Slack built in for emergencies which can and do happen.
What is with all these silly posts equating planned leave with emergencies. The procedure for requesting leave through a manager is in place so that planned leave requests can be MANAGED ahead of time and don't create emergencies. It is silly to assume businesses should run such that planned leave results emergencies.
The point is that claiming the office canāt function during vacations is a false argument. Emergencies come up and are handled, so something with months notice should be fine.
Businesses CAN function but why would you CHOOSE to function in an "emergency" state? Just because something is possible doesn't make it reasonable. Is it ok to inconvenience you, ask you to do more, and cause you stress if I know you can handle it?
The people unable to understand the need for a leave policy are the exact ones who would complain when they are asked to do anything extra.
In OPs case I agree they have months to sort this out but procedures for requesting and approving leave are in place for a very good reason and anyone who can't see this is blinded by their self importance.
Sigh. Two months notice is not an emergency. Two people being gone once in a blue moon is not an emergency. The same levers that could be pulled in an emergency can now be orchestrated months in advance.
I used the quote function to respond to a specific post, not OPs
There are plenty of people on this thread who seem to object to any leave policy that requires approval
In my post did you not read the last line that I said that OP has two months to sort this out. GEEZ, read better.
I can read - you asked what is with all the silly posts equating planned leave with emergencies. So you were not referring to a single post. The response explained it to you. Nobody is suggesting we should always be in emergency mode. Beyond that, I donāt have much else for you on this topic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your organization is so incredibly short staffed that there is literally no back up, plan for a situation where someone has a heart attack or is hospitalized or someoneās parent dies. The problem is not really with the employees. And the same is true with the school system. Ideally, there would be one or two highly trained individuals who are like permanent on-call substitutes for a school who can easily swap in when someone is out Iām saying this is someone who graded finals from a hospital room while high on narcotics because there was no one else who could fulfill that function. here the problem is not with the teacher or the employee but with a system that has no Slack built in for emergencies which can and do happen.
What is with all these silly posts equating planned leave with emergencies. The procedure for requesting leave through a manager is in place so that planned leave requests can be MANAGED ahead of time and don't create emergencies. It is silly to assume businesses should run such that planned leave results emergencies.
The point is that claiming the office canāt function during vacations is a false argument. Emergencies come up and are handled, so something with months notice should be fine.
Businesses CAN function but why would you CHOOSE to function in an "emergency" state? Just because something is possible doesn't make it reasonable. Is it ok to inconvenience you, ask you to do more, and cause you stress if I know you can handle it?
The people unable to understand the need for a leave policy are the exact ones who would complain when they are asked to do anything extra.
In OPs case I agree they have months to sort this out but procedures for requesting and approving leave are in place for a very good reason and anyone who can't see this is blinded by their self importance.
Sigh. Two months notice is not an emergency. Two people being gone once in a blue moon is not an emergency. The same levers that could be pulled in an emergency can now be orchestrated months in advance.
I used the quote function to respond to a specific post, not OPs
There are plenty of people on this thread who seem to object to any leave policy that requires approval
In my post did you not read the last line that I said that OP has two months to sort this out. GEEZ, read better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your organization is so incredibly short staffed that there is literally no back up, plan for a situation where someone has a heart attack or is hospitalized or someoneās parent dies. The problem is not really with the employees. And the same is true with the school system. Ideally, there would be one or two highly trained individuals who are like permanent on-call substitutes for a school who can easily swap in when someone is out Iām saying this is someone who graded finals from a hospital room while high on narcotics because there was no one else who could fulfill that function. here the problem is not with the teacher or the employee but with a system that has no Slack built in for emergencies which can and do happen.
What is with all these silly posts equating planned leave with emergencies. The procedure for requesting leave through a manager is in place so that planned leave requests can be MANAGED ahead of time and don't create emergencies. It is silly to assume businesses should run such that planned leave results emergencies.
The point is that claiming the office canāt function during vacations is a false argument. Emergencies come up and are handled, so something with months notice should be fine.
Businesses CAN function but why would you CHOOSE to function in an "emergency" state? Just because something is possible doesn't make it reasonable. Is it ok to inconvenience you, ask you to do more, and cause you stress if I know you can handle it?
The people unable to understand the need for a leave policy are the exact ones who would complain when they are asked to do anything extra.
In OPs case I agree they have months to sort this out but procedures for requesting and approving leave are in place for a very good reason and anyone who can't see this is blinded by their self importance.
Sigh. Two months notice is not an emergency. Two people being gone once in a blue moon is not an emergency. The same levers that could be pulled in an emergency can now be orchestrated months in advance.
I used the quote function to respond to a specific post, not OPs
There are plenty of people on this thread who seem to object to any leave policy that requires approval
In my post did you not read the last line that I said that OP has two months to sort this out. GEEZ, read better.