Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do not talk to the female co-author. She's trouble and will make your life hell.
Found the misogynist.
Has nothing to do with her sex, but she's already making trouble where there's no issue.
There absolutely is an issue: OP did shoddy work. The author absolutely should have pointed out the shoddy work since 1. It reflects on her personally since she’s in the piece and 2. It reflects on the university who pays OP.
Pointing out bad work isn’t “making trouble”.
She didn't "point out bad work." She made false accusations and LIED.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do not talk to the female co-author. She's trouble and will make your life hell.
Found the misogynist.
Has nothing to do with her sex, but she's already making trouble where there's no issue.
There absolutely is an issue: OP did shoddy work. The author absolutely should have pointed out the shoddy work since 1. It reflects on her personally since she’s in the piece and 2. It reflects on the university who pays OP.
Pointing out bad work isn’t “making trouble”.
She didn't "point out bad work." She made false accusations and LIED.
She didn't do either of those things. Her accusations weren't false; they were entirely reasonable (and likely true) that OP essentially ignored her on the call because of unconscious bias (whether gender or race).
She didn't lie either, as she probably misheard OP's very badly worded statement about not wanting to "not hear" them both.
Her complaints and accusations are totally reasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do not talk to the female co-author. She's trouble and will make your life hell.
Found the misogynist.
Has nothing to do with her sex, but she's already making trouble where there's no issue.
There absolutely is an issue: OP did shoddy work. The author absolutely should have pointed out the shoddy work since 1. It reflects on her personally since she’s in the piece and 2. It reflects on the university who pays OP.
Pointing out bad work isn’t “making trouble”.
She didn't "point out bad work." She made false accusations and LIED.