Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t recall having calendar issues in the previous administration. Is it just me?? I can’t believe staff is spending so much time debating something that could be fixed by using a calendar that already worked. Just get rid of religious holidays.
We have started to chase Fairfax, which this year pulled the rug out by starting even earlier after we had already moved up a week to stay with them. The thing to get rid of, that most people supported, is the two week winter break. It’s not customary in most parts of the country and working parents hate it. I would much rather travel towards the end of August and have a nice break before school starts than have to scramble to get childcare for that first week or burn two whole weeks of leave. You want to go visit family halfway around the world, do it in the summer if you can’t fit it in in a week (which with the way the holidays fall is usually about 10 days). I’m so tempted not to send my kid back for the first week because they shouldn’t be rewarded for such behavior and kids don’t belong in school in the middle of August.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t recall having calendar issues in the previous administration. Is it just me?? I can’t believe staff is spending so much time debating something that could be fixed by using a calendar that already worked. Just get rid of religious holidays.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t recall having calendar issues in the previous administration. Is it just me?? I can’t believe staff is spending so much time debating something that could be fixed by using a calendar that already worked. Just get rid of religious holidays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the same amount of time off thought isn't it? Option 1 starts a week earlier but has 2 weeks off at Christmas. Options 2 and 3 start a week later but only have one week off at Christmas.
I'm fine with option 1. Summer is long enough and I like the 2 week winter break.
Get rid of the religious holidays and end on June 7. Falls Church is doing it. One of Loudoun’s options is the same. A nine week summer means summer school ends just as teachers have to report back. I’m sure that will make finding summer school teachers much easier.
This sounds great to me.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the same amount of time off thought isn't it? Option 1 starts a week earlier but has 2 weeks off at Christmas. Options 2 and 3 start a week later but only have one week off at Christmas.
I'm fine with option 1. Summer is long enough and I like the 2 week winter break.
Get rid of the religious holidays and end on June 7. Falls Church is doing it. One of Loudoun’s options is the same. A nine week summer means summer school ends just as teachers have to report back. I’m sure that will make finding summer school teachers much easier.
This sounds great to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the same amount of time off thought isn't it? Option 1 starts a week earlier but has 2 weeks off at Christmas. Options 2 and 3 start a week later but only have one week off at Christmas.
I'm fine with option 1. Summer is long enough and I like the 2 week winter break.
Get rid of the religious holidays and end on June 7. Falls Church is doing it. One of Loudoun’s options is the same. A nine week summer means summer school ends just as teachers have to report back. I’m sure that will make finding summer school teachers much easier.
Anonymous wrote:It's the same amount of time off thought isn't it? Option 1 starts a week earlier but has 2 weeks off at Christmas. Options 2 and 3 start a week later but only have one week off at Christmas.
I'm fine with option 1. Summer is long enough and I like the 2 week winter break.
Anonymous wrote:Is there any chance the school board will offer a pre-planned compromise? Community preferred 2, committee preferred 3, superintendent proposes 1 and school board compromises with 3? I feel like the boundary process was similar, where the superintendent presented something and the school board suggested/compromised on something different. Or compromise by with option 2, the only difference from option 3 is spring break lines up with neighboring districts which I think is a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The increase in instructional time is great. Back to 180 days. I'm very happy about that.
I’m a teacher, I’m furious. We’ve never started that early. Having the time off in the summer is one of the few, very important, perks of this job. It’s not the salary. The light workload. It’s the summer, and I’m losing a week of it?!
Anonymous wrote:The increase in instructional time is great. Back to 180 days. I'm very happy about that.