Anonymous wrote:We are following farming schedule when less than 2% population is involved in farming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 2 week winter break is dumb. Kids are in school the entire week leading up to Christmas then off for an entire week the first week of January.
A full week off for Thanksgiving is dumb too. The Wednesday should be a half day. Parents can take their kids out if needed. This is about the sub shortage.
It’s actually about giving school staff longer breaks. My org has done this a full week at Thanksgiving for 20 years. This year we have 2 weeks at Christmas and staff is elated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 2 week winter break is dumb. Kids are in school the entire week leading up to Christmas then off for an entire week the first week of January.
A full week off for Thanksgiving is dumb too. The Wednesday should be a half day. Parents can take their kids out if needed. This is about the sub shortage.
It’s actually about giving school staff longer breaks. My org has done this a full week at Thanksgiving for 20 years. This year we have 2 weeks at Christmas and staff is elated.
Anonymous wrote:The 2 week winter break is dumb. Kids are in school the entire week leading up to Christmas then off for an entire week the first week of January.
A full week off for Thanksgiving is dumb too. The Wednesday should be a half day. Parents can take their kids out if needed. This is about the sub shortage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do they want to make these changes? What is the reasoning and the driving force behind it and why aren’t we sticking to this year‘s calendar, last year‘s calendar etc.?
They want more professional days and more/longer breaks.
Have they articulated that this is for the mental health of Teachers somewhere? It's not great for working parents, and if they don't frontload actual instructional days before APs, it is a wash for students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do they want to make these changes? What is the reasoning and the driving force behind it and why aren’t we sticking to this year‘s calendar, last year‘s calendar etc.?
They want more professional days and more/longer breaks.
Anonymous wrote:Why do they want to make these changes? What is the reasoning and the driving force behind it and why aren’t we sticking to this year‘s calendar, last year‘s calendar etc.?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did they sneak in a calendar, Option A, starting SO early in August? To make 8/21 or 8/23 seem reasonable?
It seemed like Smondrowski really wanted an early start.
Of course the calendar committee panders to the opinion of one Board member over thousands of parents.
But "thousands of parents" don't outweigh tens or scores of thousands.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did they sneak in a calendar, Option A, starting SO early in August? To make 8/21 or 8/23 seem reasonable?
It seemed like Smondrowski really wanted an early start.
Yeah, cut already burned out teachers’ summer shorter this year when we can barely retain them under normal circumstances. Brilliant idea! Smondrowski has always been a moron though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did they sneak in a calendar, Option A, starting SO early in August? To make 8/21 or 8/23 seem reasonable?
It seemed like Smondrowski really wanted an early start.