Anonymous wrote:William looks terrible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well they are old. King Charles can hardly walk though -- his legs must be messed up somehow. He looks like Henry VIII on PBS.
Henry VIII was short and fat. Charles may not be super hot, but he's neither of those things...
Anonymous wrote:Given their largely linear family tree and shallow gene pool, the royals don’t look half bad.
Anonymous wrote:
She clearly looks the youngest and freshest- and it’s genetics and nothing more. I don’t understand her use of heavy bronzer, it is really off-putting. She is a lovely woman with lovely skin, there is no need.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Camilla looks very similar to Jill Biden and they are about the same age (Camilla a few years older).
Also, on Kate—I wonder if she has stomach issues. I know a lot of women who develop stomach issues like IBS or food intolerances in their 30s and end up on restricted diets, cutting dairy or wheat or fats. Most of the very thin middle aged women I know fall into this category—they eat healthy but can’t eat a lot of the yummy foods that keep some padding kn the rest of us or they end up with intestinal distress. The other really thin women I know are distance runners.
A lot of disordered eaters make up sensitivities and allergies, too. I think it is fair to assume Kate is on a very restrictive diet.
Maybe, but now that I’m 50, I am utterly shocked at the number of older white women who get raging diarrhea or gas if they eat what I consider a normal diet. I eat gluten, dairy, sugar, meat, everything and I used o assume all these women were partially anorexic until I saw it happening to friends and family that used to be right with me on the brownie sundae train. I don’t know if it’s a genetic susceptibility on the Northern European gene line or what. I’ve also noticed on the metro a number of women n their 40s who have just horrific gas, and I assume they have the same problem. So now when I see a woman in her 40s/50s that has lost a lot of weight, I tend to think gastro issues, not eating disorder.
She clearly looks the youngest and freshest- and it’s genetics and nothing more.
Anonymous wrote:The men in the family don't age well - Edward is another example. He was quite attractive in his youth, but the hair loss really aged him.
Agreed was as well about styling - Anne has had unflattering hair for YEARS. I saw pictures of her when she around 40, and she was dressed so matronly - her daughter is around 40 now and still looks great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 she just looks like she's wearing the heaviest makeup.
Harry looks younger to me in pix where you can actually see him (which makes sense bc he is!)
No way, Kate's makeup is quite heavy and not in a good way. I think Kate is beautiful but there is no denying that Meghan has a more youthful look.
Maybe for her age but nobody is going to magically think she’s years younger than she actually is. You could say the others look worse but nobody is fooling anyone here.