Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of these women claiming to be voting for republicans, good luck when you are formally subjugated to second class status.

It's like that R woman who needed an abortion due to medical reasons, had to go to borrow money to go to a different state to get an abortion, and now realizes, abortion access is necessary for all women.

No one ever thinks they need abortion access until they do.

Here is the problem. Too many entitled R women think that the abortion laws are only for the poor and minorities who have aren't responsible for their reproductive health. They are loose or uneducated women who are trying to game the system. They think that if the they need one, because they aren't "one of them", that they can call their state senator and get the help that they need.

This woman admitted that she's always identified as pro-life, but when her baby died in utero and she needed, one she was aghast that she couldn't bypass the law and get one in her home state. Hello. This is the very problem. It isn't always unwanted children or unplanned children that cause a mother to have to fact the difficult decision to abort. Sometimes a very wanted child by couples who planned their conception need to be aborted to save the mother' life. And these Handmaiden Laws are going to kill women. This woman very nearly died, but because of her privilege and wealth, she was able to find a clinic out of state and actually get there in time to get the abortion needed to save her body and her life.

This message needs to get out to Republican women who think that the laws won't apply to them if/when they or their daughters need this life-saving procedure. And if they continue to vote Republican, that these elected officials want to enact a national ban that would mean there will no longer be clinics anywhere in the US that the privileged will be able to travel to to get the procedure. So, it will no longer be only "those people" who are dying from pregnancies that threaten the mother's life. It will be women from all races and all walks of life.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/missouri-woman-denied-emergency-abortion-161500460.html

PP here.. exactly.

Rs are so dumb to think that the abortion issue is about punishing the wh0res.

Any man who would be fine with a law forcing his wife/daughter/sister to have her rapist's baby is a sick f*er.

All we’ve heard on social media is that there have been various gag orders on doctors and nurses about sharing the dire stories. Why have none of the families come forward yet? Miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies aren’t exactly rare so you know, mathematically, that some women have already died because of the forced birth policies. If I were a surviving widower whose wife was killed by extremist forced birther policies, you can be damn sure I’d be spending the rest of my life letting the forced birthers know that they murdered my wife.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of these women claiming to be voting for republicans, good luck when you are formally subjugated to second class status.

It's like that R woman who needed an abortion due to medical reasons, had to go to borrow money to go to a different state to get an abortion, and now realizes, abortion access is necessary for all women.

No one ever thinks they need abortion access until they do.

Here is the problem. Too many entitled R women think that the abortion laws are only for the poor and minorities who have aren't responsible for their reproductive health. They are loose or uneducated women who are trying to game the system. They think that if the they need one, because they aren't "one of them", that they can call their state senator and get the help that they need.

This woman admitted that she's always identified as pro-life, but when her baby died in utero and she needed, one she was aghast that she couldn't bypass the law and get one in her home state. Hello. This is the very problem. It isn't always unwanted children or unplanned children that cause a mother to have to fact the difficult decision to abort. Sometimes a very wanted child by couples who planned their conception need to be aborted to save the mother' life. And these Handmaiden Laws are going to kill women. This woman very nearly died, but because of her privilege and wealth, she was able to find a clinic out of state and actually get there in time to get the abortion needed to save her body and her life.

This message needs to get out to Republican women who think that the laws won't apply to them if/when they or their daughters need this life-saving procedure. And if they continue to vote Republican, that these elected officials want to enact a national ban that would mean there will no longer be clinics anywhere in the US that the privileged will be able to travel to to get the procedure. So, it will no longer be only "those people" who are dying from pregnancies that threaten the mother's life. It will be women from all races and all walks of life.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/missouri-woman-denied-emergency-abortion-161500460.html

PP here.. exactly.

Rs are so dumb to think that the abortion issue is about punishing the wh0res.

Any man who would be fine with a law forcing his wife/daughter/sister to have her rapist's baby is a sick f*er.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of these women claiming to be voting for republicans, good luck when you are formally subjugated to second class status.

It's like that R woman who needed an abortion due to medical reasons, had to go to borrow money to go to a different state to get an abortion, and now realizes, abortion access is necessary for all women.

No one ever thinks they need abortion access until they do.

Here is the problem. Too many entitled R women think that the abortion laws are only for the poor and minorities who have aren't responsible for their reproductive health. They are loose or uneducated women who are trying to game the system. They think that if the they need one, because they aren't "one of them", that they can call their state senator and get the help that they need.

This woman admitted that she's always identified as pro-life, but when her baby died in utero and she needed, one she was aghast that she couldn't bypass the law and get one in her home state. Hello. This is the very problem. It isn't always unwanted children or unplanned children that cause a mother to have to fact the difficult decision to abort. Sometimes a very wanted child by couples who planned their conception need to be aborted to save the mother' life. And these Handmaiden Laws are going to kill women. This woman very nearly died, but because of her privilege and wealth, she was able to find a clinic out of state and actually get there in time to get the abortion needed to save her body and her life.

This message needs to get out to Republican women who think that the laws won't apply to them if/when they or their daughters need this life-saving procedure. And if they continue to vote Republican, that these elected officials want to enact a national ban that would mean there will no longer be clinics anywhere in the US that the privileged will be able to travel to to get the procedure. So, it will no longer be only "those people" who are dying from pregnancies that threaten the mother's life. It will be women from all races and all walks of life.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/missouri-woman-denied-emergency-abortion-161500460.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of these women claiming to be voting for republicans, good luck when you are formally subjugated to second class status.

It's like that R woman who needed an abortion due to medical reasons, had to go to borrow money to go to a different state to get an abortion, and now realizes, abortion access is necessary for all women.

No one ever thinks they need abortion access until they do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:🤬🤬🤬

It will probably end up 57% to 43%. Not even close.

Women are more reliable voters than men.

Does that change the fact that nearly fifty percent of the polled male voters have no problem removing women’s autonomy? That’s not a bit disappointing or rage inducing?

+1 This explains why to men it’s just one of a list of issues to vote on that they can say “oh gas prices are more important.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:🤬🤬🤬

It will probably end up 57% to 43%. Not even close.

Women are more reliable voters than men.

Does that change the fact that nearly fifty percent of the polled male voters have no problem removing women’s autonomy? That’s not a bit disappointing or rage inducing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:🤬🤬🤬

It will probably end up 57% to 43%. Not even close.

Women are more reliable voters than men.

Anonymous wrote:🤬🤬🤬

Anonymous wrote:🤬🤬🤬

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of these women claiming to be voting for republicans, good luck when you are formally subjugated to second class status.

You sound angry at people who aren't voting the way you want and may be causing your candidate to lose.

My candidate is not going to lose. My candidate's opposition is flip flopping as fast and hard as he can on the abortion issue and some other issues but he is will fail. It's a very important issue and the republican running in my state blew it. He will lose.

curious, who is the flip-flopping candidate?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of these women claiming to be voting for republicans, good luck when you are formally subjugated to second class status.

You sound angry at people who aren't voting the way you want and may be causing your candidate to lose.

My candidate is not going to lose. My candidate's opposition is flip flopping as fast and hard as he can on the abortion issue and some other issues but he is will fail. It's a very important issue and the republican running in my state blew it. He will lose.

curious, who is the flip-flopping candidate?