Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BC is not a Big Ten school on any metric.
The likely expansion targets (In no order other than ND):
Notre Dame
U-Washington
U-Colorado
Stanford
U-Oregon
UVA
UNC
UFlorida
BC would bring the Big Ten show to the middle of the entire New England region and that is the media strategy. Same as Stanford in San Fran NorCal.
Texas will flip to the Big Ten
Washington brings Pacific NW and borders highly populated areas of Canada will be invited.
Florida will be a later add. Florida is too snooty for the SEC and brings value for member schools.
Colorado brings the mountain west with no in state competition.
Unc and Uva and Oregon are not valuable enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BC is not a Big Ten school on any metric.
The likely expansion targets (In no order other than ND):
Notre Dame
U-Washington
U-Colorado
Stanford
U-Oregon
UVA
UNC
UFlorida
Great list !
However, I do not understand why the University of Florida would leave the SEC. Eventually the SEC will renegotiate the broadcast rights and pay schools in line with the Big Ten so I doubt that money would be the reason. Can anyone help me to understand why Florida is a reasonable Big Ten target ?
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BC is not a Big Ten school on any metric.
The likely expansion targets (In no order other than ND):
Notre Dame
U-Washington
U-Colorado
Stanford
U-Oregon
UVA
UNC
UFlorida
Great list !
However, I do not understand why the University of Florida would leave the SEC. Eventually the SEC will renegotiate the broadcast rights and pay schools in line with the Big Ten so I doubt that money would be the reason. Can anyone help me to understand why Florida is a reasonable Big Ten target ?
Anonymous wrote:BC is not a Big Ten school on any metric.
The likely expansion targets (In no order other than ND):
Notre Dame
U-Washington
U-Colorado
Stanford
U-Oregon
UVA
UNC
UFlorida
Anonymous wrote:BC is not a Big Ten school on any metric.
The likely expansion targets (In no order other than ND):
Notre Dame
U-Washington
U-Colorado
Stanford
U-Oregon
UVA
UNC
UFlorida
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now that UCLA and USC are partners it looks like it could be 100 million+ per year. Plus with UMD being the 8th highest public and 14th highest overall research budget nationally, it could increase those rankings as well.
I feel bad for Uva and UNC that could be stuck in the ACC with that horrible iron clad contract through 2036.
Aren't the sports programs a net negative for the university? I mean the stadiums alone cost more than this.
I always thought this was a strange marriage and colleges would be better without it.
Anonymous wrote:BC, Rutgers, Penn State, Maryland,Ohio State, Florida
Michigan, Michigan State, Indiana, Purdue, Wisconsin, Northwestern
Illinois, Minnesota, Texas, Nebraska, Iowa, Notre Dame
Colorado, UCLA, USC, Stanford, Cal, Washington
This will be the final dominant in dollars college football conference (and still wax snooty on academics)