Anonymous wrote:I can see being reasonably annoyed about this if you were like the bride's sister and the groom's family's kids all got invited. But then it's not really a no kids issue at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had a no kids wedding. We also had a 4yo flower girl, 7yo ring bearer, and 12yo "junior usher". I don't know anyone who counts participants in the actual wedding party against the "no kids" rule.
I had a cousin who raised a stink about it. But her main issue was that I chose to use the son of my lifelong best friend as my ring bearer instead of her son. My cousin and I aren't even remotely close...she was invited to the wedding to appease my mother. My best friend is like a sister to me. No brainer.
No. A no kids wedding means no kids at all and this includes the wedding party.
Wrong.
+1. Seriously wondering if this pp has ever been to a wedding. Flower girls and ring bearers are typically children related to the bride and groom. They are very commonly at weddings. Their attendance does not mean all guests can bring along their kids. Is this not something everyone knows?
It might be normal for you, but not everyone on this message board was born and raised in your culture.
Are you under the impression that OP is not familiar with American wedding customs? That she has not seen media or movies that show American weddings? That she, a DC urban mom, has no idea what an American wedding entails?
This level of entitlement feels very American white lady to me.
But yes, OP, it’s normal. Sorry you had to get a sitter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had a no kids wedding. We also had a 4yo flower girl, 7yo ring bearer, and 12yo "junior usher". I don't know anyone who counts participants in the actual wedding party against the "no kids" rule.
I had a cousin who raised a stink about it. But her main issue was that I chose to use the son of my lifelong best friend as my ring bearer instead of her son. My cousin and I aren't even remotely close...she was invited to the wedding to appease my mother. My best friend is like a sister to me. No brainer.
No. A no kids wedding means no kids at all and this includes the wedding party.
Wrong.
+1. Seriously wondering if this pp has ever been to a wedding. Flower girls and ring bearers are typically children related to the bride and groom. They are very commonly at weddings. Their attendance does not mean all guests can bring along their kids. Is this not something everyone knows?
You’re a spirit kind of clueless
It might be normal for you, but not everyone on this message board was born and raised in your culture.
Are you under the impression that OP is not familiar with American wedding customs? That she has not seen media or movies that show American weddings? That she, a DC urban mom, has no idea what an American wedding entails?
This level of entitlement feels very American white lady to me.
But yes, OP, it’s normal. Sorry you had to get a sitter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We just had someone add kids names and meals to the RSVP card. Had to contact them to say the kids were not included. They retracted their response card. (Oh well).
If all of the first and second cousins’ children were invited, it would add at least 50 kids.
Wow. That is next level rude.
Anonymous wrote:We just had someone add kids names and meals to the RSVP card. Had to contact them to say the kids were not included. They retracted their response card. (Oh well).
If all of the first and second cousins’ children were invited, it would add at least 50 kids.
Anonymous wrote:If I could do it over again (my wedding was 10 years ago), I would have explicitly invited kids. I remember going to family weddings as a kid and thinking the bride was a princess and that eating cake and dancing and staying up a little late was the most magical thing in the world. We had one kid crash our wedding and some of my favorite photos are with her on the dance floor. I think brides get so caught up in trying to be classy or formal and it’s not what you remember many years later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I could do it over again (my wedding was 10 years ago), I would have explicitly invited kids. I remember going to family weddings as a kid and thinking the bride was a princess and that eating cake and dancing and staying up a little late was the most magical thing in the world. We had one kid crash our wedding and some of my favorite photos are with her on the dance floor. I think brides get so caught up in trying to be classy or formal and it’s not what you remember many years later.
Or they just really like kids and don't want bands of them flying through what is one of the biggest and potentially most expensive days of their life. I had a no kids wedding and no regrets, I don't like being around tons of kids. I love my two, but for a night out? Forget it. Don't need my kids with me or to be around other people's.
Anonymous wrote:If I could do it over again (my wedding was 10 years ago), I would have explicitly invited kids. I remember going to family weddings as a kid and thinking the bride was a princess and that eating cake and dancing and staying up a little late was the most magical thing in the world. We had one kid crash our wedding and some of my favorite photos are with her on the dance floor. I think brides get so caught up in trying to be classy or formal and it’s not what you remember many years later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We just had someone add kids names and meals to the RSVP card. Had to contact them to say the kids were not included. They retracted their response card. (Oh well).
If all of the first and second cousins’ children were invited, it would add at least 50 kids.
Tacky
Anonymous wrote:We just had someone add kids names and meals to the RSVP card. Had to contact them to say the kids were not included. They retracted their response card. (Oh well).
If all of the first and second cousins’ children were invited, it would add at least 50 kids.