Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The point is that Dartmouth absolutely is “middling” when it comes to research in comparison to its peer institutions. That’s not a controversial or unpopular or inaccurate statement whatsoever.
Right! And Michael Jordan is of “middling” height next to Yao Ming. Also not controversial, also not unpopular, and also stupid and useless.
/ ps your statement actually is controversial, unpopular, inaccurate, and stupid.
Oh and forgot to add: YOU SAID NOTHING ABOUT PEER INSTITUTIONS IN YOUR FIRST POST! Nor have you named them now… lol weak tea man!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The point is that Dartmouth absolutely is “middling” when it comes to research in comparison to its peer institutions. That’s not a controversial or unpopular or inaccurate statement whatsoever.
Right! And Michael Jordan is of “middling” height next to Yao Ming. Also not controversial, also not unpopular, and also stupid and useless.
/ ps your statement actually is controversial, unpopular, inaccurate, and stupid.
Anonymous wrote:The point is that Dartmouth absolutely is “middling” when it comes to research in comparison to its peer institutions. That’s not a controversial or unpopular or inaccurate statement whatsoever.
'Anonymous wrote:The point is that Dartmouth absolutely is “middling” when it comes to research in comparison to its peer institutions. That’s not a controversial or unpopular or inaccurate statement whatsoever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get the Dartmouth booster. Dartmouth and it’s alums and marketing material all make it a point to emphasize how similar they are to an LAC.
I am the guy you are referring to as "the Dartmouth booster". I have no affiliation and have visited exactly once. I am not a Dartmouth "booster" in any way.
I am a "facts" booster, and an "easily googled defeater of BS" booster. And I don't care what Dartmouth alumns say. Yes I know they still brand themselves Dartmouth College and tout that they are the smallest of the Ivies with 6,300 undergrads. But they also have 2100 grad students, which is only a few hundred fewer than Princeton (2500 PhD, 333 masters). Plus there is that whole Carnegie classification R1 thing, and the $326 million in funding. lol.... These are FACTS.
In a forum like this FACTS MATTER, because some families may read things here and may make decisions based on it. As an open forum, your opinions, even grossly uninformed ones, are welcome, but so are the responses wchich demonstrate how they are factually inaccurate.
Do you "get it" now?
Has Dartmouth lost its accreditation as a four-year institution? What are your thoughts on this?
What? Its most recent accreditation just occurred in 2020 and won’t come up for review again until 2029.
Well I have been looking for any news stories stating that "Dartmouth has not lost its accreditation as a four-year institution" and they do not seem to exist. So what exactly do you make of that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK so the fact that Dartmouth falls in and out of the R1 group every couple years sort of supports the idea that it's "middling" when it comes to research.
No, it's just that it's more like a LAC than a research university. It only has a handful of grad programs. It's an unusual school--because it has a couple of PhD programs it gets classified as a research university rather than an LAC in the Carnegie system.
Yeah, Those idiots at the Carnegie system. Good thing you know more than them, and all their data and criteria!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get the Dartmouth booster. Dartmouth and it’s alums and marketing material all make it a point to emphasize how similar they are to an LAC.
I am the guy you are referring to as "the Dartmouth booster". I have no affiliation and have visited exactly once. I am not a Dartmouth "booster" in any way.
I am a "facts" booster, and an "easily googled defeater of BS" booster. And I don't care what Dartmouth alumns say. Yes I know they still brand themselves Dartmouth College and tout that they are the smallest of the Ivies with 6,300 undergrads. But they also have 2100 grad students, which is only a few hundred fewer than Princeton (2500 PhD, 333 masters). Plus there is that whole Carnegie classification R1 thing, and the $326 million in funding. lol.... These are FACTS.
In a forum like this FACTS MATTER, because some families may read things here and may make decisions based on it. As an open forum, your opinions, even grossly uninformed ones, are welcome, but so are the responses wchich demonstrate how they are factually inaccurate.
Do you "get it" now?
Has Dartmouth lost its accreditation as a four-year institution? What are your thoughts on this?
What? Its most recent accreditation just occurred in 2020 and won’t come up for review again until 2029.
Well I have been looking for any news stories stating that "Dartmouth has not lost its accreditation as a four-year institution" and they do not seem to exist. So what exactly do you make of that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get the Dartmouth booster. Dartmouth and it’s alums and marketing material all make it a point to emphasize how similar they are to an LAC.
I am the guy you are referring to as "the Dartmouth booster". I have no affiliation and have visited exactly once. I am not a Dartmouth "booster" in any way.
I am a "facts" booster, and an "easily googled defeater of BS" booster. And I don't care what Dartmouth alumns say. Yes I know they still brand themselves Dartmouth College and tout that they are the smallest of the Ivies with 6,300 undergrads. But they also have 2100 grad students, which is only a few hundred fewer than Princeton (2500 PhD, 333 masters). Plus there is that whole Carnegie classification R1 thing, and the $326 million in funding. lol.... These are FACTS.
In a forum like this FACTS MATTER, because some families may read things here and may make decisions based on it. As an open forum, your opinions, even grossly uninformed ones, are welcome, but so are the responses wchich demonstrate how they are factually inaccurate.
Do you "get it" now?
Has Dartmouth lost its accreditation as a four-year institution? What are your thoughts on this?
What? Its most recent accreditation just occurred in 2020 and won’t come up for review again until 2029.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get the Dartmouth booster. Dartmouth and it’s alums and marketing material all make it a point to emphasize how similar they are to an LAC.
I am the guy you are referring to as "the Dartmouth booster". I have no affiliation and have visited exactly once. I am not a Dartmouth "booster" in any way.
I am a "facts" booster, and an "easily googled defeater of BS" booster. And I don't care what Dartmouth alumns say. Yes I know they still brand themselves Dartmouth College and tout that they are the smallest of the Ivies with 6,300 undergrads. But they also have 2100 grad students, which is only a few hundred fewer than Princeton (2500 PhD, 333 masters). Plus there is that whole Carnegie classification R1 thing, and the $326 million in funding. lol.... These are FACTS.
In a forum like this FACTS MATTER, because some families may read things here and may make decisions based on it. As an open forum, your opinions, even grossly uninformed ones, are welcome, but so are the responses wchich demonstrate how they are factually inaccurate.
Do you "get it" now?
Has Dartmouth lost its accreditation as a four-year institution? What are your thoughts on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get the Dartmouth booster. Dartmouth and it’s alums and marketing material all make it a point to emphasize how similar they are to an LAC.
I am the guy you are referring to as "the Dartmouth booster". I have no affiliation and have visited exactly once. I am not a Dartmouth "booster" in any way.
I am a "facts" booster, and an "easily googled defeater of BS" booster. And I don't care what Dartmouth alumns say. Yes I know they still brand themselves Dartmouth College and tout that they are the smallest of the Ivies with 6,300 undergrads. But they also have 2100 grad students, which is only a few hundred fewer than Princeton (2500 PhD, 333 masters). Plus there is that whole Carnegie classification R1 thing, and the $326 million in funding. lol.... These are FACTS.
In a forum like this FACTS MATTER, because some families may read things here and may make decisions based on it. As an open forum, your opinions, even grossly uninformed ones, are welcome, but so are the responses wchich demonstrate how they are factually inaccurate.
Do you "get it" now?