Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really wish people would shut up about this. If you want your child to wear one they can, if you don't, the policy now says they don't have to. Is this discussion going to go on forever recycling the same tired stuff over and over? Or can we just stop?
The pro-plague crowd just can’t help themselves.
You know you're talking about nearly the whole rest of the world? The U.S. was an outlier on masking, particularly of young children. DC was an outlier in the United States in terms of how long it's taking to end this. The CDC and the DOH - hardly conservative organizations on this topic - have looked at the evidence. If none of this makes any impact on you, you're in epistemic closure-land along with the qanon people and guys who think they're Jesus.
Well said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really wish people would shut up about this. If you want your child to wear one they can, if you don't, the policy now says they don't have to. Is this discussion going to go on forever recycling the same tired stuff over and over? Or can we just stop?
The pro-plague crowd just can’t help themselves.
You know you're talking about nearly the whole rest of the world? The U.S. was an outlier on masking, particularly of young children. DC was an outlier in the United States in terms of how long it's taking to end this. The CDC and the DOH - hardly conservative organizations on this topic - have looked at the evidence. If none of this makes any impact on you, you're in epistemic closure-land along with the qanon people and guys who think they're Jesus.
Anonymous wrote:W6 - Title 1 - DH said they didn't see any kids unmasked, so my son wanted his mask even though we had told him he doesnt have to wear it. He told him he could put it in his backpack later if he wanted to. We are ok with not masking when the numbers are low, but its not like I want him to be the unmasking warrior for the school, especially when I get a vibe that it's not accepted. We'll see what he says this afternoon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really wish people would shut up about this. If you want your child to wear one they can, if you don't, the policy now says they don't have to. Is this discussion going to go on forever recycling the same tired stuff over and over? Or can we just stop?
The pro-plague crowd just can’t help themselves.
You know you're talking about nearly the whole rest of the world? The U.S. was an outlier on masking, particularly of young children. DC was an outlier in the United States in terms of how long it's taking to end this. The CDC and the DOH - hardly conservative organizations on this topic - have looked at the evidence. If none of this makes any impact on you, you're in epistemic closure-land along with the qanon people and guys who think they're Jesus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really wish people would shut up about this. If you want your child to wear one they can, if you don't, the policy now says they don't have to. Is this discussion going to go on forever recycling the same tired stuff over and over? Or can we just stop?
The pro-plague crowd just can’t help themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really wish people would shut up about this. If you want your child to wear one they can, if you don't, the policy now says they don't have to. Is this discussion going to go on forever recycling the same tired stuff over and over? Or can we just stop?
I am bored of the discussion of the virtues of masking or unmasking, but am finding the reports from various areas of what actually happened this morning quite interesting. That has not been discussed to death, since it just happened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really wish people would shut up about this. If you want your child to wear one they can, if you don't, the policy now says they don't have to. Is this discussion going to go on forever recycling the same tired stuff over and over? Or can we just stop?
I am bored of the discussion of the virtues of masking or unmasking, but am finding the reports from various areas of what actually happened this morning quite interesting. That has not been discussed to death, since it just happened.
Anonymous wrote:I really wish people would shut up about this. If you want your child to wear one they can, if you don't, the policy now says they don't have to. Is this discussion going to go on forever recycling the same tired stuff over and over? Or can we just stop?