Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her forehead is very broad at the top which is what is throwing me off. It’s the opposite of the oval shaped face. Which has a high and often large forehead but still tapers at the top.
I also just want to give her a sandwich, yes she’s skinny but I’m not getting woman vibes from her, no softness, no breast, no butt, large misshapen head. Without all of the airbrushing and makeup artistry…. I suspect she more resembles Skelator than svelte leggy beauty.
Seriously some of you are so self loathing… it leaps off of the page here. Only a trans teenager or pre pubescent girl could possibly meet the ideal some of you strive for. It’s not realistic for most young women. Otherwise you are starving yourself, dying or lightening things or lopping off body parts. So very unhealthy.
Having small breasts and butt DOES NOT mean someone is not feminine. She looks more feminine to me than those grotesque women with implants and good for her for not getting a boob job at her net worth. Kerri Walsh Jennings is an A cup at best, has no fat on her butt and she breastfed her 3 kids successfully. We need to get away from the myth that feminine means looking like an inflatable sex doll.
+1
Thank you. So sick of hearing this garbage about thin women not being "real women." People cannot help their genetics - as I'm sure some of the overweight posters here would agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For all the people upset that (1) there are women do not want to look like her (2) a WASPY wedding in Nantucket is not their ideal, get over yourselves. Different people find different things attractive! In 2022, please don't be upset that some people are not accepting of a certain aesthetic being crammed down their throat as "ideal". It doesn't make them jealous or even critical to say that this whole thing, is not their thing. There are even (gasp!) plenty of rich white blond women who would vomit at this aesthetic as well.
Only crazy ones. Most people would say not my style. But vomiting? Calling them pigs and masculine and skeletal? Nope. This shows deep insecurity and rabid anger at something unattainable. I went to several Lebanese extravagant weddings and, while they were so over the top and definitely not my style, I was happy for the family and honored to be invited. I didn't even dream to think that they needed my acceptance and the last thing that crossed my mind was to critique their makeup, hair, or clothes. And no, I didn't vomit looking at the flower arrangements. But I don't have a mental disease.
Anonymous wrote:For all the people upset that (1) there are women do not want to look like her (2) a WASPY wedding in Nantucket is not their ideal, get over yourselves. Different people find different things attractive! In 2022, please don't be upset that some people are not accepting of a certain aesthetic being crammed down their throat as "ideal". It doesn't make them jealous or even critical to say that this whole thing, is not their thing. There are even (gasp!) plenty of rich white blond women who would vomit at this aesthetic as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks very healthy and pretty. Some of you ladies sound jealous.
I agree. I can't believe people are tearing apart her appearance and face/body. These same people are horrified about fat and body shaming and images young girls see.
Pathetic.
There's space between "tearing apart her appearance" and "she is the ideal white beauty with a gorgeous face and if you disagree you're jealous". She's not disfigured but she's not exceptional either. She's just . . . thin and blonde and connected.
And by all accounts, included by her husband's ex-wife, she is an incredibly warm, loving and kind person. It's just ridiculous anonymous keyboard warriors want to belittle and attack people's appearance constantly. And we wonder why there is a mental health crisis in this country.
Anonymous wrote:She looks very healthy and pretty. Some of you ladies sound jealous.
Anonymous wrote:Soooo white
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her forehead is very broad at the top which is what is throwing me off. It’s the opposite of the oval shaped face. Which has a high and often large forehead but still tapers at the top.
I also just want to give her a sandwich, yes she’s skinny but I’m not getting woman vibes from her, no softness, no breast, no butt, large misshapen head. Without all of the airbrushing and makeup artistry…. I suspect she more resembles Skelator than svelte leggy beauty.
Seriously some of you are so self loathing… it leaps off of the page here. Only a trans teenager or pre pubescent girl could possibly meet the ideal some of you strive for. It’s not realistic for most young women. Otherwise you are starving yourself, dying or lightening things or lopping off body parts. So very unhealthy.
Having small breasts and butt DOES NOT mean someone is not feminine. She looks more feminine to me than those grotesque women with implants and good for her for not getting a boob job at her net worth. Kerri Walsh Jennings is an A cup at best, has no fat on her butt and she breastfed her 3 kids successfully. We need to get away from the myth that feminine means looking like an inflatable sex doll.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She seems to be trying so hard to impress, compared to someone like Marina Rust, who radiates elegance, confidence, and a sense of humor about herself.
Marina Rust is the best.
And here's a picture from Marina Rust's wedding. So white! So classic! How dare she!![]()
Crickets.
This looks like the same wedding.
Anonymous wrote:Her forehead is very broad at the top which is what is throwing me off. It’s the opposite of the oval shaped face. Which has a high and often large forehead but still tapers at the top.
I also just want to give her a sandwich, yes she’s skinny but I’m not getting woman vibes from her, no softness, no breast, no butt, large misshapen head. Without all of the airbrushing and makeup artistry…. I suspect she more resembles Skelator than svelte leggy beauty.
Seriously some of you are so self loathing… it leaps off of the page here. Only a trans teenager or pre pubescent girl could possibly meet the ideal some of you strive for. It’s not realistic for most young women. Otherwise you are starving yourself, dying or lightening things or lopping off body parts. So very unhealthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The wedding may be generic but the bride and groom look great. She’s very pretty and slim and he’s good looking in that wasp-y patrician sort of way. His hair looks good, her outfits are cute, flower girl dresses are sweet …. Really have to dig for something to not like here. Haters are gonna hate, I guess.
Will Kopelman, WASPy? Okay. Do you know what WASP is?
Um, yes, I do. And despite being of Jewish decent, the groom is clearly going for that New England Anglo look, with the hair, the slight tan, and the J. crew suit, and nary a kippah or chuppah ANYWHERE nor to mention the aesthetic of the wedding. An observation, not an insult.
- A Jew
Maybe they're not observant Jews? Is that allowed?![]()
- another Jew
Sure, of course. But the observation up thread that it’s a WASP-y aesthetic has been met with people calling out that the groom and family is Jewish and that poster is “stupid.” The groom and family are 100% downplaying any Jewish or religious roots in favor of a more New England WASP vibe. That’s fine, I’m a non practicing Jew too. But it doesn’t negate the observation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wanna know where they got their moolah!
Here's how:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arie_L._Kopelman
I thought Jill Kargman's whole persona was based on being relatively "middle class" in a sea of wealth. She writes about how she lives in kind of a dingy neighborhood, doesn't "summer" or fly by private jet etc--it's her whole thing. Yet her dad heads Chanel? I am confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wanna know where they got their moolah!
Here's how:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arie_L._Kopelman
I thought Jill Kargman's whole persona was based on being relatively "middle class" in a sea of wealth. She writes about how she lives in kind of a dingy neighborhood, doesn't "summer" or fly by private jet etc--it's her whole thing. Yet her dad heads Chanel? I am confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wanna know where they got their moolah!
Here's how:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arie_L._Kopelman
I thought Jill Kargman's whole persona was based on being relatively "middle class" in a sea of wealth. She writes about how she lives in kind of a dingy neighborhood, doesn't "summer" or fly by private jet etc--it's her whole thing. Yet her dad heads Chanel? I am confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wanna know where they got their moolah!
Here's how:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arie_L._Kopelman
Anonymous wrote:For all the people upset that (1) there are women do not want to look like her (2) a WASPY wedding in Nantucket is not their ideal, get over yourselves. Different people find different things attractive! In 2022, please don't be upset that some people are not accepting of a certain aesthetic being crammed down their throat as "ideal". It doesn't make them jealous or even critical to say that this whole thing, is not their thing. There are even (gasp!) plenty of rich white blond women who would vomit at this aesthetic as well.