Anonymous wrote:The Queen should have done what was rumored in the press-- pass over Charles+ the hag in favor of naming Wlls/Kate as the next king/queen.

Anonymous wrote:The Queen should have done what was rumored in the press-- pass over Charles+ the hag in favor of naming Wlls/Kate as the next king/queen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine the British public accepting that old hag Camilla after what she did so openly with Charles against the lovely Di. Shame on them. Overdue time to end the monarchy anyway. The British Royal Family is truly dysfunctional.

They're fine with her.

They seem also to be fine with adulterous relationships pedophiles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine the British public accepting that old hag Camilla after what she did so openly with Charles against the lovely Di. Shame on them. Overdue time to end the monarchy anyway. The British Royal Family is truly dysfunctional.

They're fine with her.

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine the British public accepting that old hag Camilla after what she did so openly with Charles against the lovely Di. Shame on them. Overdue time to end the monarchy anyway. The British Royal Family is truly dysfunctional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Um, Jackie ran straight into the arms of a gross old man who didn't treat her well because she was scared and desperate to get out of the US. Hardly something to aspire to. She then had what seemed to be a good life in NYC because she had a career and stayed out of the spotlight, two things Diana would not have been capable of. Jackie came from a dysfunctional background and suffered a lot of trauma, but she was far brighter and more grounded than Diana.

Jackie Kennedy was both dumb and a Mean Girl, not a great combination. We've known this since at least 2011: https://www.thesmartset.com/article10051101/

Why would Caroline release these?

Anonymous wrote:I cannot imagine the British public accepting that old hag Camilla after what she did so openly with Charles against the lovely Di. Shame on them. Overdue time to end the monarchy anyway. The British Royal Family is truly dysfunctional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My opinion is that I’d never take seconds.

Camilla was always first. Diana was the seconds.

Nope. She didn’t get the wedding, the heirs. Always the mistress.

Women who aren't idiots don't care about princess weddings and heirs. Who cares about getting to weir a tiara when you're a basket care who can't even hold her own head up.
Camilla got everything out of life that a sensible person would want. She's alive and well, she's rich, and she's happily married. If Diana were alive right now, she'd probably be on her fourth marriage and addicted to painkillers and plastic surgery.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Um, Jackie ran straight into the arms of a gross old man who didn't treat her well because she was scared and desperate to get out of the US. Hardly something to aspire to. She then had what seemed to be a good life in NYC because she had a career and stayed out of the spotlight, two things Diana would not have been capable of. Jackie came from a dysfunctional background and suffered a lot of trauma, but she was far brighter and more grounded than Diana.

Jackie Kennedy was both dumb and a Mean Girl, not a great combination. We've known this since at least 2011: https://www.thesmartset.com/article10051101/

Anonymous wrote:Diana gets sh*t because she had borderline personality disorder. Guess what? I have borderline personality disorder. And I work really, really hard on myself. Among other things, I meditate for 2+ hours a day, and I chose to remain childfree because I don't think my brain can take the stress.

But I have opportunities that Diana didn't, for all that I'm just some American citizen and she was from one of the oldest, richest families in Europe.

Diana was raised in a time and culture where they covered up mental illness in shame, and the British aristocracy knew nothing about meditation, yoga, emotional regulation, or just having honest conversations.

Plus, she was a teenager. Have you seen her in those old interviews? Where Charles looks suave and rehearsed, she looks awkward, insecure, and sad. His face is smooth and she is unable to hide her facial expressions. That's not a bad woman, that's an unprepared, uneducated, vulnerable woman.

We also don't know that Diana was just "spreading rumors" about the nanny, as another PP said.

Whatever bad decisions Diana made after her marriage, I put it down to her not being medicated properly and not having the emotional regulation tools and supportive, educated friends she would need in order to handle life. So on top of Diana being BPD, she was trapped in a notoriously narcissistic family where everyone had the advantage over her.

So yeah, I wouldn't put her in the same boat as Sleazeball Charles and his mistress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Um, Jackie ran straight into the arms of a gross old man who didn't treat her well because she was scared and desperate to get out of the US. Hardly something to aspire to. She then had what seemed to be a good life in NYC because she had a career and stayed out of the spotlight, two things Diana would not have been capable of. Jackie came from a dysfunctional background and suffered a lot of trauma, but she was far brighter and more grounded than Diana.

Jackie Kennedy was both dumb and a Mean Girl, not a great combination. We've known this since at least 2011: https://www.thesmartset.com/article10051101/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.

Camilla the mistress would have never married Charles - Diana would have made sure of it. The fact that he had to wait a further 8 years after her death to be able to marry a woman he'd been tipping since the 70s proves it.

Diana would have been living a glamorous life in New York City and in London just like Jackie Onassis. Charles was being out-maneuvered legally and publicly which is why he gave her $18 million in the divorce and then she was dead a year later.

Um, Jackie ran straight into the arms of a gross old man who didn't treat her well because she was scared and desperate to get out of the US. Hardly something to aspire to. She then had what seemed to be a good life in NYC because she had a career and stayed out of the spotlight, two things Diana would not have been capable of. Jackie came from a dysfunctional background and suffered a lot of trauma, but she was far brighter and more grounded than Diana.