Anonymous wrote:Bannon has been indicted in NY and will be surrendering on Thursday.
The precise details of the state case could not be confirmed Tuesday evening. But people familiar with the situation, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sealed indictment, suggested the prosecution will likely mirror aspects of the federal case in which Bannon was pardoned.
In that indictment, prosecutors alleged that Bannon and several others defrauded contributors to a private, $25 million fundraising effort, called “We Build the Wall,” taking funds that donors were told would support construction of a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/06/bannon-border-wall-indictment/
The precise details of the state case could not be confirmed Tuesday evening. But people familiar with the situation, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sealed indictment, suggested the prosecution will likely mirror aspects of the federal case in which Bannon was pardoned.
In that indictment, prosecutors alleged that Bannon and several others defrauded contributors to a private, $25 million fundraising effort, called “We Build the Wall,” taking funds that donors were told would support construction of a barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Oh boy, well, I’m convinced. Let’s just submit to republican authoritarianism bc this f**ktard is making threats.
What is authoritarianism to you? Last I checked, Republicans want the power to be with the people, as per the Constitution.
Cool, so lets abolish the electoral college and use the popular vote. Power to the people, not the states!
Except that's the very definition of authoritarianismIt gives the power to California and New York to decide who the president is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Oh boy, well, I’m convinced. Let’s just submit to republican authoritarianism bc this f**ktard is making threats.
What is authoritarianism to you? Last I checked, Republicans want the power to be with the people, as per the Constitution.
Anonymous wrote:Holder re: fast and furious. June 2012
No worries, law is on Bannon's side.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Oh boy, well, I’m convinced. Let’s just submit to republican authoritarianism bc this f**ktard is making threats.
What is authoritarianism to you? Last I checked, Republicans want the power to be with the people, as per the Constitution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Oh boy, well, I’m convinced. Let’s just submit to republican authoritarianism bc this f**ktard is making threats.
What is authoritarianism to you? Last I checked, Republicans want the power to be with the people, as per the Constitution.
Cool, so lets abolish the electoral college and use the popular vote. Power to the people, not the states!
Except that's the very definition of authoritarianismIt gives the power to California and New York to decide who the president is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Oh boy, well, I’m convinced. Let’s just submit to republican authoritarianism bc this f**ktard is making threats.
What is authoritarianism to you? Last I checked, Republicans want the power to be with the people, as per the Constitution.
Cool, so lets abolish the electoral college and use the popular vote. Power to the people, not the states!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Oh boy, well, I’m convinced. Let’s just submit to republican authoritarianism bc this f**ktard is making threats.
What is authoritarianism to you? Last I checked, Republicans want the power to be with the people, as per the Constitution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Oh boy, well, I’m convinced. Let’s just submit to republican authoritarianism bc this f**ktard is making threats.
Anonymous wrote:Democrats will regret this in the long run. Mark my words.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guilty on both count!
Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.
I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.
For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.
Why the constant whining and moaning about how everything is so unfair. He had every opportunity to testify and avoid this. Choices have consequences.
Who's whining? I just believe in an equal application of justice. If you prosecute Bannon, you must prosecute those Dems that did same during Trump's presidency. That's it, that's all.
Do you think Bannon cares if he goes to jail? He doesn't. I think Dems are short-sighted on this and should have waited for a larger charge against him.
Which dems did the “exact same thing”?
Yeah, really want to hear what dems you're referring to?