Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As far as cost of living goes - his 'yacht' is the cheaper option in the D.C. area. His fellow Senators and Pelosi are living in $2 million rowhomes and condos.
That yacht is worth close to $1m and the dock fees alone are probably close to $2K/month for a boat of that size.
His 'yacht' is a houseboat bought in 2013 in a liquidation auction for $200,000.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4946155-House-Boat-4.html
You can't even get a studio for that price on the Wharf or Capitol Hill.
And I'm telling you what it's worth in that location, assuming it is fully functional.
Again, wealthy Senator pontificating from the back of his yacht in DC at one of the most expensive mooring's in the region while his constituents beg from the water won't play well back in WV on the local nightly news.
Anonymous wrote:I prefer that my Larla have access to good quality childcare so she doesn’t have to drop out of the workforce to care for others like I and many other women have had to. I would like my Larla’s Larla’s to be able to go to college without relying on family wealth.
Lots of ways to go to college without relying on family wealth. Your Larla's Larla could go on an ROTC scholarship if she cannot get an academic or need based scholarship. Rather than going away, perhaps your Larla could help her Larla and let her live at home. And, of course, Larla's Larla does not have to go to an expensive private college.
But, I do have a question: If your Larla's Larla goes to college and flunks out because she doesn't go to class, who is paying for that? I'll answer for you--the taxpayer. And, I would hazard a guess--like all things when you have no skin in the game--this scenario will happen more often than you think.
Research housing and 235 and foreclosures. None of your own money involved? Just walk away.
Anonymous wrote:I guess the real question is whether the progress wing would be OK with $1.5T - $1.7T reconciliation bill. That’s probably all we can get sometime in December.
I prefer that my Larla have access to good quality childcare so she doesn’t have to drop out of the workforce to care for others like I and many other women have had to. I would like my Larla’s Larla’s to be able to go to college without relying on family wealth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we all just saw via the juicy federal unemployment and other slush, that providing endless government largess simply encourages people to not work . . . hence the current shortage of workers/inflation. I used to be an Andrew Yang/UBI-er. Now I really think government should work to get out of the way of small businesses and shrink where possible. Very grateful to Manchin & Sinema for standing up for common sense where a lot of democrats probably feel bullied to endorse this . . .
![]()
Asking as only a half joke, are you a bot? You’re practically spamming this thread with the phrase “very grateful” in relation to Sinema and Manchin. It’s the second time this page you’ve used the phrase. And for what? For them taking money from their corporate donors? For actively preventing America from making progress for all?
I am not a bot, and I doubt I'm the only grateful poster. I'm a very boring and very grateful mom of two larlas who I hope will not inherit a country drowning in debt. Would a bot know the dcum larla verbiage? Doubt it. Believe it or not, everyone who disagrees with you is not a Russian troll. Some people just think for themselves and have their own opinions - imagine that!
Anonymous wrote:On a related note, whoever coined the "Build Back Better" moniker should get sacked pronto.
What a stupid name. It's like a dumbed down version of MAGA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As far as cost of living goes - his 'yacht' is the cheaper option in the D.C. area. His fellow Senators and Pelosi are living in $2 million rowhomes and condos.
That yacht is worth close to $1m and the dock fees alone are probably close to $2K/month for a boat of that size.
His 'yacht' is a houseboat bought in 2013 in a liquidation auction for $200,000.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4946155-House-Boat-4.html
You can't even get a studio for that price on the Wharf or Capitol Hill.
And I'm telling you what it's worth in that location, assuming it is fully functional.
Again, wealthy Senator pontificating from the back of his yacht in DC at one of the most expensive mooring's in the region while his constituents beg from the water won't play well back in WV on the local nightly news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As far as cost of living goes - his 'yacht' is the cheaper option in the D.C. area. His fellow Senators and Pelosi are living in $2 million rowhomes and condos.
That yacht is worth close to $1m and the dock fees alone are probably close to $2K/month for a boat of that size.
His 'yacht' is a houseboat bought in 2013 in a liquidation auction for $200,000.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4946155-House-Boat-4.html
You can't even get a studio for that price on the Wharf or Capitol Hill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As far as cost of living goes - his 'yacht' is the cheaper option in the D.C. area. His fellow Senators and Pelosi are living in $2 million rowhomes and condos.
That yacht is worth close to $1m and the dock fees alone are probably close to $2K/month for a boat of that size.
Anonymous wrote:
As far as cost of living goes - his 'yacht' is the cheaper option in the D.C. area. His fellow Senators and Pelosi are living in $2 million rowhomes and condos.