who is making these edits?

https://www.tiktok.com/@whitehouse/video/7605372615431113998

The fkn jewish supremacist admits to wanting to attack Iran for 40 years.
Rubio admits that Israel forced the US into the war.
There's no doubt on these two things.
Fk Israel.

Netanyahu's WARNING To U.S. Before Iran War

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.

Bibi has been saying that Iran’s nuclear weapon is just around the corner for literally decades. There’s a supercut of it somewhere that I will try to find. And again, why do we need to take care of this now when we obliterated it last year?

Benjamin Netanyahu's 33 years of Iran nuclear warnings


Netanyahu’s Iran Nuke LIES Get Regurgitated By U.S.

Israel is a country that lives off grand PR delusions. If the entire Iranian government and military apparatus was decapitated, who is bombing the entire Me with missile after missile causing trillions in damage to military bases and civilian infrastructure from Bahrain to Israel. They claimed they finished the job last June with Iran as well. In reality, I don’t think they even started. They don’t know what they’re doing

They said the beepers completely wiped out Hezbollah yet Hezbollah struck Israel yesterday too.

Anonymous wrote:So I guess we've given up on the concept of 3 branches of government. Trump has started his own war, not briefed nor asked the consent of Congress, and Americans are dying while the Republican dominated Congress is utterly silent.

A few Republicans are speaking up. Massie in the House and Rand Paul in the Senate. Not enough though.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iran-congress-republicans-trump-war-powers/
Washington — Fractures within the Republican Party have become apparent as the GOP grapples with the massive U.S. and Israeli military operation launched on Iran over the weekend. And the breaks come as lawmakers face votes this week on whether to rein in President Trump's ability to pursue further military action against Iran without congressional authorization.

From the president's usual opponents in his party to some of his most stalwart supporters, the U.S. actions in Iran have prompted strong pushback in pockets of the GOP.

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky is leading the House war powers effort alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California. Massie has criticized the strikes in strong terms, claiming the approach is not in line with the "America First" agenda, while saying that lawmakers must go on the record on the issue.

GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a co-sponsor of the war powers resolution in the upper chamber, has also condemned the move to strike Iran without Congress' approval, citing the legislative branch's authority to declare war.

The House and Senate are set to vote on war powers resolutions this week that would require the president to seek congressional approval to use military force on Iran. And while the efforts are mostly backed by Democrats, they pose key tests for the GOP.

Rep. Warren Davidson, an Ohio Republican, has called on the administration to lay out compelling reasons for the war in Iran. Ahead of this weekend's attack, Davidson said he would support the war powers resolution in the House "in the absence of new information."

"This week we'll either see real intel, hear a persuasive explanation with a defined mission, and declare war / authorize a mission, or Congress must pass this War Powers Resolution and cease work in Iran," Davidson wrote on X on Monday.

So I guess we've given up on the concept of 3 branches of government. Trump has started his own war, not briefed nor asked the consent of Congress, and Americans are dying while the Republican dominated Congress is utterly silent.

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see the whitehouse tiktok account that posted the soundtrack for Epic Fury? its the slow macarena

https://www.tiktok.com/@whitehouse/video/7612801539761130765

Such a callous way to talk about war where 6 American soldiers have died already. Typical for this administration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.

Bibi has been saying that Iran’s nuclear weapon is just around the corner for literally decades. There’s a supercut of it somewhere that I will try to find. And again, why do we need to take care of this now when we obliterated it last year?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Iran state media reported that they did not strike Saudi Arabia oil refinery. They accuse Israel of carrying out yet another false flag attack.“

Ooh, I *definitely* believe what Iran has to say!

It’s quite the conundrum isn’t it. Do
You believe Iran or Israel? Neither have shown themselves to be credible…

Every single credible news source has reported Iran hitting Saudi Arabia's oil refinery. But sure, Iran is probably telling the truth.

Israel knows the US wants to get out of this mess ASAP.

By attacking Saudi oilfields and blaming it on Iran it ensures that it effectively destabilizes their neighbors for a long time ensuring that Israel has full hegemony in the Middle East also Europe.

Israel’s future plan is to have full control of the Straits of Hormuz as well as the Suez Canal effectively controlling all the oil and trade in the world.

That may come at a price. Israelis will flee the nation in droves. What’s the point of all this if there’s no Israel?

Israel managed to get the entire region pissed off at them now including allies like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Their attempts to foment civil war between Arabs and Iranians failed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.

For 35 years Israel has been saying Iran is a week away from a nuclear bomb. It’s all been a lie. Iran pose no threat to the US or US interests. If you are so willing to take care of this now send enlist and join the invasion!

The naivete (stupidity?) is gob smacking. Wow.

Naïveté how? Iran was excited about making peace and doing peace talks with the US (yet again because they already this with the Obama administration before trump dismantled that(.

This is all about netanyahu and his narcissism

"Excited"?? More like, dragged to the table.

Netanyahu flipped the table upside down. Trump was close to finalizing negotiations last June before Israel surprise attacked Iran and he had to pretend he knew about it all along and the negotiations were just a ruse

It’s embarrassing to be this cucked by another man

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Trump’s Case for War With Iran Faces Growing Scrutiny
U.S. intelligence showed threats from Iran loomed, as they had for years. But they were not imminent.

+1 Trump (aka President Bone Spurs) is doing a "wag the dog" war. It's not like his kids or the kids of anyone he knows are going to die in this conflict.

Well considering that six troops are dead already within 3 days, they're going to have to come up with a better excuse for why they started this idiot war.

If even the Wall Street Journal thinks that Trump's excuse for starting a war with Iran is BS, just three days after the conflict starts, Trump is in trouble.
https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-...ny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

DP. It seems a lot of you have a very peculiar vision of the WSJ. Its news is spot on accurate, and its editorial/opinion pages are very critical of Trump. You would know this if you actually read it.

Anyone see the whitehouse tiktok account that posted the soundtrack for Epic Fury? its the slow macarena

https://www.tiktok.com/@whitehouse/video/7612801539761130765